Katalin Nagy C., Enikő Németh T., Zsuzsanna Németh
{"title":"如何研究语料库中的隐含语用现象","authors":"Katalin Nagy C., Enikő Németh T., Zsuzsanna Németh","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Corpus pragmatics research mainly employs methods based on explicitly available, automatically searchable forms in corpora. However, there are pragmatic phenomena which do not have explicit forms; therefore, they are difficult to identify in corpora. The present paper aims to examine possibilities of studying implicit pragmatic phenomena in large corpora. Relying on the Hungarian Gigaword Corpus, it provides case studies on implicit arguments, conventional indirect speech acts and implicatures in Hungarian language use. The first case study analyses occurrences of the verb <em>iszik</em> ‘drink’ with implicit direct object arguments in its habitual reading ‘drink alcohol’, the second explores conventionally indirect directives with the verb <em>tud</em> ‘can’, and the third examines implicatures suggested in dispreferred second pair parts. The main conclusion of the paper is that only a corpus-based investigation is possible in studies of implicit pragmatic phenomena, but even this is restricted. Searching for certain explicit patterns in the corpus, combined with a manual, qualitative pragmatic analysis might lead us to identifying implicit pragmatic phenomena. Consequently, corpus methodology and traditional pragmatics research methods can be fruitfully combined.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Pages 79-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to investigate implicit pragmatic phenomena in corpora\",\"authors\":\"Katalin Nagy C., Enikő Németh T., Zsuzsanna Németh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.02.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Corpus pragmatics research mainly employs methods based on explicitly available, automatically searchable forms in corpora. However, there are pragmatic phenomena which do not have explicit forms; therefore, they are difficult to identify in corpora. The present paper aims to examine possibilities of studying implicit pragmatic phenomena in large corpora. Relying on the Hungarian Gigaword Corpus, it provides case studies on implicit arguments, conventional indirect speech acts and implicatures in Hungarian language use. The first case study analyses occurrences of the verb <em>iszik</em> ‘drink’ with implicit direct object arguments in its habitual reading ‘drink alcohol’, the second explores conventionally indirect directives with the verb <em>tud</em> ‘can’, and the third examines implicatures suggested in dispreferred second pair parts. The main conclusion of the paper is that only a corpus-based investigation is possible in studies of implicit pragmatic phenomena, but even this is restricted. Searching for certain explicit patterns in the corpus, combined with a manual, qualitative pragmatic analysis might lead us to identifying implicit pragmatic phenomena. Consequently, corpus methodology and traditional pragmatics research methods can be fruitfully combined.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"240 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 79-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000384\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000384","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
语料库语用学研究主要采用基于语料库中明确可用、可自动检索的形式的方法。然而,也有一些语用现象没有明确的形式;因此,它们在语料库中难以识别。本文旨在探讨在大型语料库中研究隐性语用现象的可能性。以匈牙利语千兆词语料库为基础,对匈牙利语使用中的隐含论点、传统间接言语行为和含意进行了案例研究。第一个案例研究分析了动词iszik ‘ drink ’在其习惯性阅读‘ drink alcohol ’中与隐含的直接宾语论点的出现,第二个案例研究了动词tud ‘ can ’的传统间接指示,第三个案例研究了不受欢迎的第二对部分所暗示的含义。本文的主要结论是,在隐性语用现象的研究中,只有基于语料库的调查是可能的,但即使这样也有局限性。在语料库中寻找特定的显性模式,并结合手工的定性语用分析,我们可能会发现隐含的语用现象。因此,语料库方法论与传统语用学研究方法可以有效地结合起来。
How to investigate implicit pragmatic phenomena in corpora
Corpus pragmatics research mainly employs methods based on explicitly available, automatically searchable forms in corpora. However, there are pragmatic phenomena which do not have explicit forms; therefore, they are difficult to identify in corpora. The present paper aims to examine possibilities of studying implicit pragmatic phenomena in large corpora. Relying on the Hungarian Gigaword Corpus, it provides case studies on implicit arguments, conventional indirect speech acts and implicatures in Hungarian language use. The first case study analyses occurrences of the verb iszik ‘drink’ with implicit direct object arguments in its habitual reading ‘drink alcohol’, the second explores conventionally indirect directives with the verb tud ‘can’, and the third examines implicatures suggested in dispreferred second pair parts. The main conclusion of the paper is that only a corpus-based investigation is possible in studies of implicit pragmatic phenomena, but even this is restricted. Searching for certain explicit patterns in the corpus, combined with a manual, qualitative pragmatic analysis might lead us to identifying implicit pragmatic phenomena. Consequently, corpus methodology and traditional pragmatics research methods can be fruitfully combined.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.