新冠肺炎大流行对认知和24小时运动行为的影响:里昂证券的研究结果

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ryan S. Falck , Megan E. O'Connell , Vanessa Taler , Parminder Raina , Christina Wolfson , Lauren E. Griffith , Eric E. Smith , Teresa Liu-Ambrose , Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) Team
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行对认知和24小时运动行为的影响:里昂证券的研究结果","authors":"Ryan S. Falck ,&nbsp;Megan E. O'Connell ,&nbsp;Vanessa Taler ,&nbsp;Parminder Raina ,&nbsp;Christina Wolfson ,&nbsp;Lauren E. Griffith ,&nbsp;Eric E. Smith ,&nbsp;Teresa Liu-Ambrose ,&nbsp;Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) Team","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic may have negatively impacted cognition due to pandemic-associated changes in 24-h movement behaviours (i.e., physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep). Whether the pandemic's effects vary by age and sex is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We examined those participants (aged 45–85 years) of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) with complete neuropsychological measures at baseline (2011–2015), no dementia/memory disorder, and partial or complete assessments at baseline, 3-year (FU1; 2015–2018), and 6-year follow-up (FU2; 2018–2021). Participants were categorized into pre-pandemic (N = 6174) or intra-pandemic (N = 5181) cohorts by FU2 assessment timing (before/after March 11th, 2020) and stratified by baseline age/sex. Cognition was measured with reliable change indices using: the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test, Mental Alternation Test (MAT), and animal fluency. We indexed physical activity and sedentary behaviour using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), and self-reported restless sleep.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Compared with their pre-pandemic peers, intra-pandemic men aged 65–85 years had lower animal fluency (−0.40 points, 99 % CI: [−0.72, −0.07]), lower PASE (−16.48 points, 99 % CI: [−24.60, −8.36]) and 14 % higher probability of ≥4 h/day sedentary behaviour (99 % CI: [0.03, 0.26]) at FU2. Intra-pandemic women aged 65–85 years had lower MAT (−0.43 points, 99 % CI: [−0.86, −0.01]) and 12 % higher probability of ≥4 h/day sedentary behaviour (99 % CI: [0.01, 0.23]). There were no between-cohort differences for those aged 45–64 years. Pandemic-related changes in 24-h movement behaviours (FU1 to FU2) were not associated with cognitive changes, regardless of age or sex.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The pandemic's effects on cognition and 24-h movement behaviours varied by age and sex; these effects are unrelated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51120,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 108243"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic's effects on cognition and 24-hour movement behaviours: Findings from the CLSA\",\"authors\":\"Ryan S. Falck ,&nbsp;Megan E. O'Connell ,&nbsp;Vanessa Taler ,&nbsp;Parminder Raina ,&nbsp;Christina Wolfson ,&nbsp;Lauren E. Griffith ,&nbsp;Eric E. Smith ,&nbsp;Teresa Liu-Ambrose ,&nbsp;Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) Team\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic may have negatively impacted cognition due to pandemic-associated changes in 24-h movement behaviours (i.e., physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep). Whether the pandemic's effects vary by age and sex is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We examined those participants (aged 45–85 years) of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) with complete neuropsychological measures at baseline (2011–2015), no dementia/memory disorder, and partial or complete assessments at baseline, 3-year (FU1; 2015–2018), and 6-year follow-up (FU2; 2018–2021). Participants were categorized into pre-pandemic (N = 6174) or intra-pandemic (N = 5181) cohorts by FU2 assessment timing (before/after March 11th, 2020) and stratified by baseline age/sex. Cognition was measured with reliable change indices using: the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test, Mental Alternation Test (MAT), and animal fluency. We indexed physical activity and sedentary behaviour using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), and self-reported restless sleep.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Compared with their pre-pandemic peers, intra-pandemic men aged 65–85 years had lower animal fluency (−0.40 points, 99 % CI: [−0.72, −0.07]), lower PASE (−16.48 points, 99 % CI: [−24.60, −8.36]) and 14 % higher probability of ≥4 h/day sedentary behaviour (99 % CI: [0.03, 0.26]) at FU2. Intra-pandemic women aged 65–85 years had lower MAT (−0.43 points, 99 % CI: [−0.86, −0.01]) and 12 % higher probability of ≥4 h/day sedentary behaviour (99 % CI: [0.01, 0.23]). There were no between-cohort differences for those aged 45–64 years. Pandemic-related changes in 24-h movement behaviours (FU1 to FU2) were not associated with cognitive changes, regardless of age or sex.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The pandemic's effects on cognition and 24-h movement behaviours varied by age and sex; these effects are unrelated.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maturitas\",\"volume\":\"196 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maturitas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512225000519\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maturitas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512225000519","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景COVID-19大流行可能对认知产生负面影响,因为与大流行相关的24小时运动行为(即身体活动、久坐行为和睡眠)发生了变化。这种流行病的影响是否因年龄和性别而异尚不清楚。方法:我们检查了加拿大老龄化纵向研究(CLSA)的参与者(45-85岁),他们在基线时(2011-2015)有完整的神经心理学测量,没有痴呆/记忆障碍,在基线时部分或完全评估,3年(FU1;2015-2018年)和6年随访(FU2;2018 - 2021)。根据FU2评估时间(2020年3月11日之前/之后)将参与者分为大流行前(N = 6174)或大流行内(N = 5181)队列,并按基线年龄/性别分层。认知是用可靠的变化指数来测量的:雷伊听觉语言学习测试,精神交替测试(MAT)和动物流畅性。我们使用老年人体力活动量表(PASE)和自我报告的不安分睡眠对体力活动和久坐行为进行索引。研究结果:与大流行前的同龄人相比,65-85岁的大流行期男性在FU2时的动物流畅性较低(- 0.40点,99% CI: [- 0.72, - 0.07]), PASE较低(- 16.48点,99% CI:[- 24.60, - 8.36]),每天静坐行为≥4小时的可能性高出14% (99% CI:[0.03, 0.26])。65-85岁的流行内女性的MAT较低(- 0.43点,99% CI:[- 0.86, - 0.01]),每天静坐行为≥4小时的可能性高出12% (99% CI:[0.01, 0.23])。在45-64岁的人群中没有队列间差异。无论年龄或性别,与大流行相关的24小时运动行为(FU1至FU2)变化与认知变化无关。大流行对认知和24小时运动行为的影响因年龄和性别而异;这些影响是不相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The COVID-19 pandemic's effects on cognition and 24-hour movement behaviours: Findings from the CLSA

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic may have negatively impacted cognition due to pandemic-associated changes in 24-h movement behaviours (i.e., physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep). Whether the pandemic's effects vary by age and sex is unclear.

Methods

We examined those participants (aged 45–85 years) of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) with complete neuropsychological measures at baseline (2011–2015), no dementia/memory disorder, and partial or complete assessments at baseline, 3-year (FU1; 2015–2018), and 6-year follow-up (FU2; 2018–2021). Participants were categorized into pre-pandemic (N = 6174) or intra-pandemic (N = 5181) cohorts by FU2 assessment timing (before/after March 11th, 2020) and stratified by baseline age/sex. Cognition was measured with reliable change indices using: the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test, Mental Alternation Test (MAT), and animal fluency. We indexed physical activity and sedentary behaviour using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), and self-reported restless sleep.

Findings

Compared with their pre-pandemic peers, intra-pandemic men aged 65–85 years had lower animal fluency (−0.40 points, 99 % CI: [−0.72, −0.07]), lower PASE (−16.48 points, 99 % CI: [−24.60, −8.36]) and 14 % higher probability of ≥4 h/day sedentary behaviour (99 % CI: [0.03, 0.26]) at FU2. Intra-pandemic women aged 65–85 years had lower MAT (−0.43 points, 99 % CI: [−0.86, −0.01]) and 12 % higher probability of ≥4 h/day sedentary behaviour (99 % CI: [0.01, 0.23]). There were no between-cohort differences for those aged 45–64 years. Pandemic-related changes in 24-h movement behaviours (FU1 to FU2) were not associated with cognitive changes, regardless of age or sex.

Interpretation

The pandemic's effects on cognition and 24-h movement behaviours varied by age and sex; these effects are unrelated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maturitas
Maturitas 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Maturitas is an international multidisciplinary peer reviewed scientific journal of midlife health and beyond publishing original research, reviews, consensus statements and guidelines, and mini-reviews. The journal provides a forum for all aspects of postreproductive health in both genders ranging from basic science to health and social care. Topic areas include:• Aging• Alternative and Complementary medicines• Arthritis and Bone Health• Cancer• Cardiovascular Health• Cognitive and Physical Functioning• Epidemiology, health and social care• Gynecology/ Reproductive Endocrinology• Nutrition/ Obesity Diabetes/ Metabolic Syndrome• Menopause, Ovarian Aging• Mental Health• Pharmacology• Sexuality• Quality of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信