IF 6.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jing Cao , Wenhua Ma , Yanpeng Gao , Chaoyang Long , Yingxin Yu
{"title":"Derivation of the oral reference dose (RfD) for bisphenol S and bisphenol F based on epidemiological and experimental studies","authors":"Jing Cao ,&nbsp;Wenhua Ma ,&nbsp;Yanpeng Gao ,&nbsp;Chaoyang Long ,&nbsp;Yingxin Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With bisphenol A (BPA) restricted, its analogs are appearing frequently in the environment, raising health concerns. However, no reasonable threshold of toxicity has been established at the current international level for BPA analogs. The aim of this study was to derive oral reference doses (RfD) for two BPA substitutes, bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF). A systematic search was conducted to screen epidemiologic and experimental rodent studies. Based on a thorough evaluation of those data, this study performed accurate model fitting using the Benchmark Dose Software (BMDS) to determine the recommended lower limit of the benchmark dose (BMDL) for BPS and BPF. Based on the dose-effect curves of the recommended models from BMDS, and incorporating the decline in male semen quality in epidemiologic studies as a critical effect, the present study further determined the departure point (POD) of BPS and BPF. After integrating uncertainty analysis, the RfD values of BPS and BPF were 0.37 and 8.09 ng/kg-bw/day, respectively, which were lower than the RfD value of BPA, but greater than the established minimum international toxicity thresholds of the tolerable daily intake of BPA. This study provides critical scientific evidence and important references for international environmental health regulatory agencies to improve their toxicity threshold settings, while emphasizing their increased attention to BPA alternatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":303,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","volume":"293 ","pages":"Article 118045"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651325003811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着双酚 A(BPA)受到限制,其类似物也频繁出现在环境中,引起了人们对健康的关注。然而,目前国际上还没有针对双酚 A 类似物确定合理的毒性阈值。本研究的目的是为双酚 S(BPS)和双酚 F(BPF)这两种双酚 A 替代品得出口服参考剂量(RfD)。研究人员对流行病学研究和啮齿动物实验研究进行了系统检索。在对这些数据进行全面评估的基础上,本研究使用基准剂量软件 (BMDS) 进行了精确的模型拟合,以确定 BPS 和 BPF 的建议基准剂量下限 (BMDL)。根据 BMDS 推荐模型的剂量效应曲线,并将流行病学研究中男性精液质量下降作为临界效应,本研究进一步确定了 BPS 和 BPF 的出发点(POD)。综合不确定性分析后,BPS 和 BPF 的 RfD 值分别为 0.37 和 8.09 纳克/千克体重/天,低于双酚 A 的 RfD 值,但高于国际上规定的双酚 A 每日可容忍摄入量的最低毒性阈值。这项研究为国际环境健康监管机构改进毒性阈值的设定提供了关键的科学证据和重要参考,同时也强调了国际环境健康监管机构对双酚 A 替代品的更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Derivation of the oral reference dose (RfD) for bisphenol S and bisphenol F based on epidemiological and experimental studies
With bisphenol A (BPA) restricted, its analogs are appearing frequently in the environment, raising health concerns. However, no reasonable threshold of toxicity has been established at the current international level for BPA analogs. The aim of this study was to derive oral reference doses (RfD) for two BPA substitutes, bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF). A systematic search was conducted to screen epidemiologic and experimental rodent studies. Based on a thorough evaluation of those data, this study performed accurate model fitting using the Benchmark Dose Software (BMDS) to determine the recommended lower limit of the benchmark dose (BMDL) for BPS and BPF. Based on the dose-effect curves of the recommended models from BMDS, and incorporating the decline in male semen quality in epidemiologic studies as a critical effect, the present study further determined the departure point (POD) of BPS and BPF. After integrating uncertainty analysis, the RfD values of BPS and BPF were 0.37 and 8.09 ng/kg-bw/day, respectively, which were lower than the RfD value of BPA, but greater than the established minimum international toxicity thresholds of the tolerable daily intake of BPA. This study provides critical scientific evidence and important references for international environmental health regulatory agencies to improve their toxicity threshold settings, while emphasizing their increased attention to BPA alternatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1234
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety is a multi-disciplinary journal that focuses on understanding the exposure and effects of environmental contamination on organisms including human health. The scope of the journal covers three main themes. The topics within these themes, indicated below, include (but are not limited to) the following: Ecotoxicology、Environmental Chemistry、Environmental Safety etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信