牙科植入物周围的骨机械行为:通过原位计算机断层扫描跟踪骨质致密化和变形情况

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Laura Preiss , Rémy Gauthier , Hervé Richard , Loïc Courtois , Anne-Lise Chopard-Lallier , Damien Fabrègue , Jérôme Chevalier , Nicolas Courtois
{"title":"牙科植入物周围的骨机械行为:通过原位计算机断层扫描跟踪骨质致密化和变形情况","authors":"Laura Preiss ,&nbsp;Rémy Gauthier ,&nbsp;Hervé Richard ,&nbsp;Loïc Courtois ,&nbsp;Anne-Lise Chopard-Lallier ,&nbsp;Damien Fabrègue ,&nbsp;Jérôme Chevalier ,&nbsp;Nicolas Courtois","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The state of bone tissue around dental implants is a crucial factor influencing their early clinical outcomes. Currently, this state is mainly defined by its primary stability, both in terms of biomechanical analysis and clinically. The clinical methods used for quantifying this stability—such as the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and Insertion Torque (IT)—are indirect measures. While these methods provide insights into the overall mechanical behavior of the bone-implant system, they do not account for the impact of implant morphology on the surrounding bone. The method presented here aims to analyze the peri-implant bone using image analysis and volume correlation techniques combined with computed tomography to assess the bone strain field and densification resulting from dental implant placement. The study utilized two types of implants with distinct designs—one cylindrical and the other self-tapping—on five iliac crest bone samples harvested from butcher pigs. The results indicated that the self-tapping implant caused significantly greater bone densification near the implant compared to the cylindrical one (46% of densification in the first 30 μm, against 21% for cylindrical implant). Additionally, the volume of strained peri-implant bone appeared to be larger for the self-tapping implant (38% of the volume was mechanically affected above 0,5% VM strains for self-tapping implant, against 31% for the cylindrical implant), though this difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, established descriptors from the literature struggled to effectively differentiate between the two implant types. Despite the study's limitations, the proposed method shows promise for distinguishing implants based on the densification and deformation of peri-implant bone, and can serve as a complementary approach to standard ISQ and IT measurements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 106966"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone mechanical behavior around dental implants: Densification and deformation follow-up by in-situ computed tomography\",\"authors\":\"Laura Preiss ,&nbsp;Rémy Gauthier ,&nbsp;Hervé Richard ,&nbsp;Loïc Courtois ,&nbsp;Anne-Lise Chopard-Lallier ,&nbsp;Damien Fabrègue ,&nbsp;Jérôme Chevalier ,&nbsp;Nicolas Courtois\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The state of bone tissue around dental implants is a crucial factor influencing their early clinical outcomes. Currently, this state is mainly defined by its primary stability, both in terms of biomechanical analysis and clinically. The clinical methods used for quantifying this stability—such as the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and Insertion Torque (IT)—are indirect measures. While these methods provide insights into the overall mechanical behavior of the bone-implant system, they do not account for the impact of implant morphology on the surrounding bone. The method presented here aims to analyze the peri-implant bone using image analysis and volume correlation techniques combined with computed tomography to assess the bone strain field and densification resulting from dental implant placement. The study utilized two types of implants with distinct designs—one cylindrical and the other self-tapping—on five iliac crest bone samples harvested from butcher pigs. The results indicated that the self-tapping implant caused significantly greater bone densification near the implant compared to the cylindrical one (46% of densification in the first 30 μm, against 21% for cylindrical implant). Additionally, the volume of strained peri-implant bone appeared to be larger for the self-tapping implant (38% of the volume was mechanically affected above 0,5% VM strains for self-tapping implant, against 31% for the cylindrical implant), though this difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, established descriptors from the literature struggled to effectively differentiate between the two implant types. Despite the study's limitations, the proposed method shows promise for distinguishing implants based on the densification and deformation of peri-implant bone, and can serve as a complementary approach to standard ISQ and IT measurements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106966\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125000827\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125000827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bone mechanical behavior around dental implants: Densification and deformation follow-up by in-situ computed tomography

Bone mechanical behavior around dental implants: Densification and deformation follow-up by in-situ computed tomography
The state of bone tissue around dental implants is a crucial factor influencing their early clinical outcomes. Currently, this state is mainly defined by its primary stability, both in terms of biomechanical analysis and clinically. The clinical methods used for quantifying this stability—such as the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and Insertion Torque (IT)—are indirect measures. While these methods provide insights into the overall mechanical behavior of the bone-implant system, they do not account for the impact of implant morphology on the surrounding bone. The method presented here aims to analyze the peri-implant bone using image analysis and volume correlation techniques combined with computed tomography to assess the bone strain field and densification resulting from dental implant placement. The study utilized two types of implants with distinct designs—one cylindrical and the other self-tapping—on five iliac crest bone samples harvested from butcher pigs. The results indicated that the self-tapping implant caused significantly greater bone densification near the implant compared to the cylindrical one (46% of densification in the first 30 μm, against 21% for cylindrical implant). Additionally, the volume of strained peri-implant bone appeared to be larger for the self-tapping implant (38% of the volume was mechanically affected above 0,5% VM strains for self-tapping implant, against 31% for the cylindrical implant), though this difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, established descriptors from the literature struggled to effectively differentiate between the two implant types. Despite the study's limitations, the proposed method shows promise for distinguishing implants based on the densification and deformation of peri-implant bone, and can serve as a complementary approach to standard ISQ and IT measurements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
505
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials. The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信