谁从组织灵活性中获益?灵活的组织实践和工资不平等

IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Alina Rozenfeld-Kiner, Tali Kristal
{"title":"谁从组织灵活性中获益?灵活的组织实践和工资不平等","authors":"Alina Rozenfeld-Kiner, Tali Kristal","doi":"10.1177/09500170251317979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the implications of flexible management practices for organizational wage gaps. It argues that the implementation of high-performance and non-standard employment practices is not only skill but also class-biased, favouring workers in supervisory positions. This argument is examined using matched employer–employee data from the 2011 British Workplace Employment Relations Study (WERS) survey, which uniquely includes detailed information on flexible management practices. Findings from fixed-effects models support the argument. Wage gaps are more pronounced between supervisors and rank-and-file workers in organizations implementing high-performance or non-standard employment practices, compared to those without such practices. Notably, heightened education-based wage gaps are observed in organizations adopting only non-standard practices. The results suggest that purportedly efficiency-oriented changes in organizational practices are not wage-neutral but tend to favour already well-compensated workers.","PeriodicalId":48187,"journal":{"name":"Work Employment and Society","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Gains From Organizational Flexibility? Flexible Organizational Practices and Wage Inequality\",\"authors\":\"Alina Rozenfeld-Kiner, Tali Kristal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09500170251317979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores the implications of flexible management practices for organizational wage gaps. It argues that the implementation of high-performance and non-standard employment practices is not only skill but also class-biased, favouring workers in supervisory positions. This argument is examined using matched employer–employee data from the 2011 British Workplace Employment Relations Study (WERS) survey, which uniquely includes detailed information on flexible management practices. Findings from fixed-effects models support the argument. Wage gaps are more pronounced between supervisors and rank-and-file workers in organizations implementing high-performance or non-standard employment practices, compared to those without such practices. Notably, heightened education-based wage gaps are observed in organizations adopting only non-standard practices. The results suggest that purportedly efficiency-oriented changes in organizational practices are not wage-neutral but tend to favour already well-compensated workers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Work Employment and Society\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Work Employment and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170251317979\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Employment and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170251317979","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了灵活管理实践对组织工资差距的影响。它认为,实施高绩效和非标准的雇佣实践不仅是技能上的,而且是阶级偏见的,有利于处于监督职位的工人。这一论点是用2011年英国工作场所雇佣关系研究(WERS)调查中匹配的雇主-雇员数据来检验的,该调查独特地包括了灵活管理实践的详细信息。固定效应模型的发现支持了这一观点。在实施高绩效或非标准雇佣实践的组织中,与没有实施此类实践的组织相比,主管和普通员工之间的工资差距更为明显。值得注意的是,在只采用非标准做法的组织中,可以观察到更高的基于教育的工资差距。研究结果表明,组织实践中所谓的以效率为导向的变化并不是工资中性的,而是倾向于有利于已经获得丰厚报酬的工人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who Gains From Organizational Flexibility? Flexible Organizational Practices and Wage Inequality
This study explores the implications of flexible management practices for organizational wage gaps. It argues that the implementation of high-performance and non-standard employment practices is not only skill but also class-biased, favouring workers in supervisory positions. This argument is examined using matched employer–employee data from the 2011 British Workplace Employment Relations Study (WERS) survey, which uniquely includes detailed information on flexible management practices. Findings from fixed-effects models support the argument. Wage gaps are more pronounced between supervisors and rank-and-file workers in organizations implementing high-performance or non-standard employment practices, compared to those without such practices. Notably, heightened education-based wage gaps are observed in organizations adopting only non-standard practices. The results suggest that purportedly efficiency-oriented changes in organizational practices are not wage-neutral but tend to favour already well-compensated workers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
13.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Work, Employment and Society (WES) is a leading international peer reviewed journal of the British Sociological Association which publishes theoretically informed and original research on the sociology of work. Work, Employment and Society covers all aspects of work, employment and unemployment and their connections with wider social processes and social structures. The journal is sociologically orientated but welcomes contributions from other disciplines which addresses the issues in a way that informs less debated aspects of the journal"s remit, such as unpaid labour and the informal economy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信