查询holep后内镜下膜性尿道粘膜预测尿失禁的能力:一项基于人工智能的前瞻性分析。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Tomer Mendelson, Ziv Savin, Ron Marom, Yotam Veredgorn, Omri Schwarztuch Gildor, Tomer Bashi, Karin Lifshitz, Adi Kidron, Amichay Nevo, Ofer Yossepowitch, Mario Sofer
{"title":"查询holep后内镜下膜性尿道粘膜预测尿失禁的能力:一项基于人工智能的前瞻性分析。","authors":"Tomer Mendelson, Ziv Savin, Ron Marom, Yotam Veredgorn, Omri Schwarztuch Gildor, Tomer Bashi, Karin Lifshitz, Adi Kidron, Amichay Nevo, Ofer Yossepowitch, Mario Sofer","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05555-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transient stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) is commonly linked to intraoperative injury of the external urethral sphincter (EUS). We assessed the reliability of the post-HoLEP endoscopic appearance of the membranous urethra mucosa (MUM) in predicting post-HoLEP continence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty HoLEPs were prospectively recorded by an artificial intelligence video platform capable of segmenting clips by surgical steps. The final clip was assessed for postoperative MUM integrity by 2 experts in HoLEP and 2 residents, all blinded to the clinical outcome. Their findings were scored as no injury, anterior injury, and lateral injury, and the results underwent statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The referent rating was 72% for no injury, 23% for anterior injury, and 5% for lateral injury. The overall inter-observer agreement was K = 0.26, the inter-experts' agreement was K = 0.12, and the inter-residents' agreement was K = 0.38, reflecting low inter-observer reliability. The postoperative rate of SUI, defined as any drop on a pad, was 30% at 1 month and 12.5% at 3 months. There was no association between the MUM injury graded and SUI according to any of the evaluators (univariate analysis OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.17-3.89). A multivariate analysis controlling for age, prostate size, resectoscope size (22 vs. 26 FR), surgery time, and use of final fulguration showed no significantly independent predictor of post-HoLEP-related incontinence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The post-HoLEP endoscopic appearance of the MUM is apparently not a reliable marker of EUS injury. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanism underlying post-HoLEP SUI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Querying the capability of the post-HoLEP endoscopic aspect of the membranous urethral mucosa in predicting urinary incontinence: a prospective AI-based analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tomer Mendelson, Ziv Savin, Ron Marom, Yotam Veredgorn, Omri Schwarztuch Gildor, Tomer Bashi, Karin Lifshitz, Adi Kidron, Amichay Nevo, Ofer Yossepowitch, Mario Sofer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-025-05555-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transient stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) is commonly linked to intraoperative injury of the external urethral sphincter (EUS). We assessed the reliability of the post-HoLEP endoscopic appearance of the membranous urethra mucosa (MUM) in predicting post-HoLEP continence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty HoLEPs were prospectively recorded by an artificial intelligence video platform capable of segmenting clips by surgical steps. The final clip was assessed for postoperative MUM integrity by 2 experts in HoLEP and 2 residents, all blinded to the clinical outcome. Their findings were scored as no injury, anterior injury, and lateral injury, and the results underwent statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The referent rating was 72% for no injury, 23% for anterior injury, and 5% for lateral injury. The overall inter-observer agreement was K = 0.26, the inter-experts' agreement was K = 0.12, and the inter-residents' agreement was K = 0.38, reflecting low inter-observer reliability. The postoperative rate of SUI, defined as any drop on a pad, was 30% at 1 month and 12.5% at 3 months. There was no association between the MUM injury graded and SUI according to any of the evaluators (univariate analysis OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.17-3.89). A multivariate analysis controlling for age, prostate size, resectoscope size (22 vs. 26 FR), surgery time, and use of final fulguration showed no significantly independent predictor of post-HoLEP-related incontinence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The post-HoLEP endoscopic appearance of the MUM is apparently not a reliable marker of EUS injury. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanism underlying post-HoLEP SUI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05555-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05555-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:钬激光前列腺摘除(HoLEP)后的短暂性应激性尿失禁(SUI)通常与术中尿道外括约肌(EUS)损伤有关。我们评估了holep后内窥镜下膜性尿道粘膜(MUM)外观预测holep后尿失禁的可靠性。方法:采用具有手术步骤分割能力的人工智能视频平台对40例holep进行前瞻性记录。2名HoLEP专家和2名住院医师对最终夹片进行术后MUM完整性评估,均对临床结果不知情。结果分为无损伤、前路损伤和侧路损伤,并对结果进行统计分析。结果:无损伤的参照评分为72%,前路损伤的参照评分为23%,外侧损伤的参照评分为5%。整体观察者间一致性K = 0.26,专家间一致性K = 0.12,居民间一致性K = 0.38,观察者间信度较低。术后SUI的发生率,定义为垫上的任何下降,1个月时为30%,3个月时为12.5%。根据任何评估者,MUM损伤分级与SUI之间没有关联(单因素分析OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.17-3.89)。一项控制年龄、前列腺大小、切除镜大小(22 vs 26 FR)、手术时间和最终电灼使用的多变量分析显示,holep术后相关尿失禁没有显著的独立预测因子。结论:holep后内镜下MUM的表现显然不是EUS损伤的可靠标志。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解holep后SUI的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Querying the capability of the post-HoLEP endoscopic aspect of the membranous urethral mucosa in predicting urinary incontinence: a prospective AI-based analysis.

Introduction: Transient stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) is commonly linked to intraoperative injury of the external urethral sphincter (EUS). We assessed the reliability of the post-HoLEP endoscopic appearance of the membranous urethra mucosa (MUM) in predicting post-HoLEP continence.

Methods: Forty HoLEPs were prospectively recorded by an artificial intelligence video platform capable of segmenting clips by surgical steps. The final clip was assessed for postoperative MUM integrity by 2 experts in HoLEP and 2 residents, all blinded to the clinical outcome. Their findings were scored as no injury, anterior injury, and lateral injury, and the results underwent statistical analyses.

Results: The referent rating was 72% for no injury, 23% for anterior injury, and 5% for lateral injury. The overall inter-observer agreement was K = 0.26, the inter-experts' agreement was K = 0.12, and the inter-residents' agreement was K = 0.38, reflecting low inter-observer reliability. The postoperative rate of SUI, defined as any drop on a pad, was 30% at 1 month and 12.5% at 3 months. There was no association between the MUM injury graded and SUI according to any of the evaluators (univariate analysis OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.17-3.89). A multivariate analysis controlling for age, prostate size, resectoscope size (22 vs. 26 FR), surgery time, and use of final fulguration showed no significantly independent predictor of post-HoLEP-related incontinence.

Conclusion: The post-HoLEP endoscopic appearance of the MUM is apparently not a reliable marker of EUS injury. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanism underlying post-HoLEP SUI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信