Nicole J Berzins, Elizabeth Orsega-Smith, Michael Mackenzie, Mary Lou Galantino, Nicole S Culos-Reed, Tara Leonard, Erika Narducci
{"title":"评估可行性,可接受性和初步健康行为的结果,以社区为基础的虚拟团体健康指导癌症幸存者计划。","authors":"Nicole J Berzins, Elizabeth Orsega-Smith, Michael Mackenzie, Mary Lou Galantino, Nicole S Culos-Reed, Tara Leonard, Erika Narducci","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09295-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary purpose was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a group health coaching (GHC) program with cancer patients and survivors; secondarily, to determine the preliminary effects of GHC on several behavioral lifestyle factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GHC was provided to people diagnosed with cancer via videoconference by trained health coaches across six GHC sessions over a 3-month period. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Data on recruitment, attrition, attendance, fidelity, retention, safety, and barriers and facilitators to implementation were assessed. Participant-reported outcomes collected via surveys included physical activity, eating habits, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, sleep, and quality of life, followed by post-program focus groups and in-depth interviews. Survey results were analyzed using repeated measures multilevel modeling. Qualitative data was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 26 participants with a variety of cancer types attended an average of 74% of coaching sessions. The intervention was feasible to implement and found acceptable by participants and health coaches. Over the course of the intervention, there was a moderate increase in total weekly physical activity minutes (baseline = 365.25, follow-up = 510.30, p = 0.032, d = 0.50), and a small increase in weekly moderate-vigorous physical activity frequency (baseline = 4.07 bouts, follow-up = 5.44 bouts, p = 0.045, d = 0.39). Additionally, a moderate increase was found in functional well-being (baseline = 16.30, follow-up = 18.93, p < 0.001, d = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: GHC may be a feasible and acceptable way to promote behavior change for physical activity in cancer patients and survivors, reducing cancer burden and enhancing functional well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 4","pages":"269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary health behavior outcomes of a community-based virtual group health coaching for cancer survivors program.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole J Berzins, Elizabeth Orsega-Smith, Michael Mackenzie, Mary Lou Galantino, Nicole S Culos-Reed, Tara Leonard, Erika Narducci\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09295-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary purpose was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a group health coaching (GHC) program with cancer patients and survivors; secondarily, to determine the preliminary effects of GHC on several behavioral lifestyle factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GHC was provided to people diagnosed with cancer via videoconference by trained health coaches across six GHC sessions over a 3-month period. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Data on recruitment, attrition, attendance, fidelity, retention, safety, and barriers and facilitators to implementation were assessed. Participant-reported outcomes collected via surveys included physical activity, eating habits, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, sleep, and quality of life, followed by post-program focus groups and in-depth interviews. Survey results were analyzed using repeated measures multilevel modeling. Qualitative data was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 26 participants with a variety of cancer types attended an average of 74% of coaching sessions. The intervention was feasible to implement and found acceptable by participants and health coaches. Over the course of the intervention, there was a moderate increase in total weekly physical activity minutes (baseline = 365.25, follow-up = 510.30, p = 0.032, d = 0.50), and a small increase in weekly moderate-vigorous physical activity frequency (baseline = 4.07 bouts, follow-up = 5.44 bouts, p = 0.045, d = 0.39). Additionally, a moderate increase was found in functional well-being (baseline = 16.30, follow-up = 18.93, p < 0.001, d = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: GHC may be a feasible and acceptable way to promote behavior change for physical activity in cancer patients and survivors, reducing cancer burden and enhancing functional well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903554/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09295-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09295-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:主要目的是评估团体健康指导(GHC)项目对癌症患者和幸存者的可行性和可接受性;其次,确定GHC对几种行为生活方式因素的初步影响。方法:经过培训的健康教练通过视频会议向诊断为癌症的人提供GHC,为期3个月,分6次进行GHC。收集了定性和定量资料。评估了招聘、减员、出勤、忠诚、保留、安全、实施障碍和促进因素等方面的数据。通过调查收集的参与者报告的结果包括身体活动、饮食习惯、感知压力、焦虑、抑郁、睡眠和生活质量,随后是项目后的焦点小组和深度访谈。采用重复测量多层次模型对调查结果进行分析。定性数据采用归纳主题分析法进行分析。结果:总体而言,26名患有各种癌症类型的参与者平均参加了74%的辅导课程。干预措施实施可行,被参与者和健康教练接受。在干预过程中,每周总体力活动分钟有适度增加(基线= 365.25分钟,随访= 510.30分钟,p = 0.032, d = 0.50),每周中高强度体力活动频率有小幅增加(基线= 4.07次,随访= 5.44次,p = 0.045, d = 0.39)。此外,功能幸福感也有适度增加(基线= 16.30,随访= 18.93,p
Assessing the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary health behavior outcomes of a community-based virtual group health coaching for cancer survivors program.
Purpose: The primary purpose was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a group health coaching (GHC) program with cancer patients and survivors; secondarily, to determine the preliminary effects of GHC on several behavioral lifestyle factors.
Methods: GHC was provided to people diagnosed with cancer via videoconference by trained health coaches across six GHC sessions over a 3-month period. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Data on recruitment, attrition, attendance, fidelity, retention, safety, and barriers and facilitators to implementation were assessed. Participant-reported outcomes collected via surveys included physical activity, eating habits, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, sleep, and quality of life, followed by post-program focus groups and in-depth interviews. Survey results were analyzed using repeated measures multilevel modeling. Qualitative data was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Results: Overall, 26 participants with a variety of cancer types attended an average of 74% of coaching sessions. The intervention was feasible to implement and found acceptable by participants and health coaches. Over the course of the intervention, there was a moderate increase in total weekly physical activity minutes (baseline = 365.25, follow-up = 510.30, p = 0.032, d = 0.50), and a small increase in weekly moderate-vigorous physical activity frequency (baseline = 4.07 bouts, follow-up = 5.44 bouts, p = 0.045, d = 0.39). Additionally, a moderate increase was found in functional well-being (baseline = 16.30, follow-up = 18.93, p < 0.001, d = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: GHC may be a feasible and acceptable way to promote behavior change for physical activity in cancer patients and survivors, reducing cancer burden and enhancing functional well-being.
期刊介绍:
Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease.
Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.