结石密度可以预测胰管结石患者需要进行ESWL治疗的次数。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Evgenija Lozova, Mia Rainio, Marianne Udd, Outi Lindström, Taija Korpela, Antti Kuuliala, Arto Mikkola, Leena Kylänpää
{"title":"结石密度可以预测胰管结石患者需要进行ESWL治疗的次数。","authors":"Evgenija Lozova, Mia Rainio, Marianne Udd, Outi Lindström, Taija Korpela, Antti Kuuliala, Arto Mikkola, Leena Kylänpää","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2025.2475084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with endotherapy (ET) is the first-line treatment in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) and main pancreatic duct stone (PDS). Our study aimed to evaluate factors that predict the outcome of ESWL in CP patients with PDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data of 166 patients with CP and radiopaque PDS. Computed tomography (CT) images were evaluated for stone density, stone size, main pancreatic duct (MPD) size, and skin-to-stone distance (SSD). Long-term pain relief results were determined <i>via</i> telephone interview in 100 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean stone density (MSD) > 1336 HU predicted the need to perform more than one ESWL session (odds ratio [OR]: 1.002; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.001 to 1.003; <i>p</i> = 0.002), cut-off 1336 HU yielding 71% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Denser stones required more ESWL and following ET, with ≥4 ET sessions resulting in better technical success. (OR: 3.222; 95% CI: 1.240 to 8.371; <i>p</i> = 0.016). Overall technical success (complete stone fragmentation in ESWL or placing a stent past the stone in ET) rate was 81.3%. Clinical success (complete or partial pain relief at the end of the treatments) rate was 83.7% and remained at the same level also in the long-term follow-up (median 5.5 years). Stone size, MPD size, or SSD were not associated with any of the study outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher MSD than 1336 HU predicts the need for more than one ESWL and ET sessions to fragment the stone and clear the duct, but when successful the long-term result is favorable.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"386-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stone density can predict the number of ESWL treatments needed in patients with pancreatic duct calculi.\",\"authors\":\"Evgenija Lozova, Mia Rainio, Marianne Udd, Outi Lindström, Taija Korpela, Antti Kuuliala, Arto Mikkola, Leena Kylänpää\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365521.2025.2475084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with endotherapy (ET) is the first-line treatment in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) and main pancreatic duct stone (PDS). Our study aimed to evaluate factors that predict the outcome of ESWL in CP patients with PDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data of 166 patients with CP and radiopaque PDS. Computed tomography (CT) images were evaluated for stone density, stone size, main pancreatic duct (MPD) size, and skin-to-stone distance (SSD). Long-term pain relief results were determined <i>via</i> telephone interview in 100 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean stone density (MSD) > 1336 HU predicted the need to perform more than one ESWL session (odds ratio [OR]: 1.002; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.001 to 1.003; <i>p</i> = 0.002), cut-off 1336 HU yielding 71% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Denser stones required more ESWL and following ET, with ≥4 ET sessions resulting in better technical success. (OR: 3.222; 95% CI: 1.240 to 8.371; <i>p</i> = 0.016). Overall technical success (complete stone fragmentation in ESWL or placing a stent past the stone in ET) rate was 81.3%. Clinical success (complete or partial pain relief at the end of the treatments) rate was 83.7% and remained at the same level also in the long-term follow-up (median 5.5 years). Stone size, MPD size, or SSD were not associated with any of the study outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher MSD than 1336 HU predicts the need for more than one ESWL and ET sessions to fragment the stone and clear the duct, but when successful the long-term result is favorable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"386-393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2475084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2475084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)联合内镜治疗(ET)是慢性胰腺炎(CP)和主胰管结石(PDS)患者的一线治疗方法。我们的研究旨在评估预测CP合并PDS患者ESWL预后的因素。方法:回顾性分析166例CP合并不透光PDS患者资料。评估计算机断层扫描(CT)图像的结石密度、结石大小、主胰管(MPD)大小和皮肤到结石的距离(SSD)。通过电话访谈确定100例患者的长期疼痛缓解效果。结果:平均结石密度(MSD)为bb0 1336 HU,预测需要进行一次以上的ESWL治疗(优势比[OR]: 1.002;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.001 ~ 1.003;p = 0.002),截止值为1336 HU,敏感性71%,特异性65%。较致密的结石需要更多的ESWL和ET治疗,≥4次ET治疗可获得更好的技术成功。(或:3.222;95% CI: 1.240 ~ 8.371;p = 0.016)。总体技术成功率(ESWL中结石完全碎裂或ET中放置支架过结石)为81.3%。临床成功率(治疗结束时疼痛完全或部分缓解)为83.7%,在长期随访(中位5.5年)中也保持相同水平。结石大小、MPD大小或SSD与任何研究结果无关。结论:高于1336 HU的MSD预示着需要一次以上的ESWL和ET治疗来粉碎结石和清除胆管,但如果成功,长期结果是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stone density can predict the number of ESWL treatments needed in patients with pancreatic duct calculi.

Objectives: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with endotherapy (ET) is the first-line treatment in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) and main pancreatic duct stone (PDS). Our study aimed to evaluate factors that predict the outcome of ESWL in CP patients with PDS.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 166 patients with CP and radiopaque PDS. Computed tomography (CT) images were evaluated for stone density, stone size, main pancreatic duct (MPD) size, and skin-to-stone distance (SSD). Long-term pain relief results were determined via telephone interview in 100 patients.

Results: Mean stone density (MSD) > 1336 HU predicted the need to perform more than one ESWL session (odds ratio [OR]: 1.002; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.001 to 1.003; p = 0.002), cut-off 1336 HU yielding 71% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Denser stones required more ESWL and following ET, with ≥4 ET sessions resulting in better technical success. (OR: 3.222; 95% CI: 1.240 to 8.371; p = 0.016). Overall technical success (complete stone fragmentation in ESWL or placing a stent past the stone in ET) rate was 81.3%. Clinical success (complete or partial pain relief at the end of the treatments) rate was 83.7% and remained at the same level also in the long-term follow-up (median 5.5 years). Stone size, MPD size, or SSD were not associated with any of the study outcomes.

Conclusions: Higher MSD than 1336 HU predicts the need for more than one ESWL and ET sessions to fragment the stone and clear the duct, but when successful the long-term result is favorable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信