商业生物降解塑料产品在模拟工业堆肥条件下的分解。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Sevil V Afshar, Alessio Boldrin, Thomas H Christensen, Fabiana Corami, Anders E Daugaard, Beatrice Rosso, Nanna B Hartmann
{"title":"商业生物降解塑料产品在模拟工业堆肥条件下的分解。","authors":"Sevil V Afshar, Alessio Boldrin, Thomas H Christensen, Fabiana Corami, Anders E Daugaard, Beatrice Rosso, Nanna B Hartmann","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-91647-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biodegradable plastics are often promoted as sustainable alternatives to conventional plastics. Nevertheless, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding their degradation under relevant conditions, particularly when compounded into commercial products. To this end, the present research investigates the disintegration of ten commercially available biodegradable plastic products under simulated industrial composting conditions. The tested products included polymer compositions of either polylactic acid (PLA), polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT)/starch, or polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), covering both flexible and rigid plastics. These products comprised three waste bags, one waste bag drawstring, one food bag (flexible plastics), two flower pots, one food container, one plate, and one lid (rigid plastics). Among the tested products, nine were marketed as compostable. Of these, six were certified under the European standard EN 13432 for compostable packaging, two held TÜV Austria's \"OK compost home\" certification, and one was labeled as compostable but lacked certification. Additionally, one product was labeled as 100% biodegradable but lacked certification, and the environment in which the product could biodegrade was not specified. Disintegration was determined according to ISO 20200 in laboratory scale tests conducted at 58 °C with 55% moisture content over 90 days. Results showed disintegration degrees ranging from 75 to 100%, with five products achieving complete disintegration. Two products, however, reached only 75% disintegration. Following the disintegration test, compost particles smaller than 2 mm were examined for microplastics (MPs) via light microscopy. MPs were detected in compost undersieves for two of the ten biodegradable plastic products, while no MPs were detected for the conventional plastics. Notably, the visual inspection was performed without pretreating the compost matrix due to the observed degradation of biodegradable plastics when using chemicals for oxidative digestion. Considering the limitations of visual MP observation without pretreatment, future research should prioritize the development of methods for extracting biodegradable MPs from complex matrices like compost. Enhanced extraction methods are essential for understanding compost's potential role as a source of MPs in the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"8569"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disintegration of commercial biodegradable plastic products under simulated industrial composting conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Sevil V Afshar, Alessio Boldrin, Thomas H Christensen, Fabiana Corami, Anders E Daugaard, Beatrice Rosso, Nanna B Hartmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-91647-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biodegradable plastics are often promoted as sustainable alternatives to conventional plastics. Nevertheless, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding their degradation under relevant conditions, particularly when compounded into commercial products. To this end, the present research investigates the disintegration of ten commercially available biodegradable plastic products under simulated industrial composting conditions. The tested products included polymer compositions of either polylactic acid (PLA), polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT)/starch, or polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), covering both flexible and rigid plastics. These products comprised three waste bags, one waste bag drawstring, one food bag (flexible plastics), two flower pots, one food container, one plate, and one lid (rigid plastics). Among the tested products, nine were marketed as compostable. Of these, six were certified under the European standard EN 13432 for compostable packaging, two held TÜV Austria's \\\"OK compost home\\\" certification, and one was labeled as compostable but lacked certification. Additionally, one product was labeled as 100% biodegradable but lacked certification, and the environment in which the product could biodegrade was not specified. Disintegration was determined according to ISO 20200 in laboratory scale tests conducted at 58 °C with 55% moisture content over 90 days. Results showed disintegration degrees ranging from 75 to 100%, with five products achieving complete disintegration. Two products, however, reached only 75% disintegration. Following the disintegration test, compost particles smaller than 2 mm were examined for microplastics (MPs) via light microscopy. MPs were detected in compost undersieves for two of the ten biodegradable plastic products, while no MPs were detected for the conventional plastics. Notably, the visual inspection was performed without pretreating the compost matrix due to the observed degradation of biodegradable plastics when using chemicals for oxidative digestion. Considering the limitations of visual MP observation without pretreatment, future research should prioritize the development of methods for extracting biodegradable MPs from complex matrices like compost. Enhanced extraction methods are essential for understanding compost's potential role as a source of MPs in the environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"8569\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91647-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91647-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可生物降解塑料经常被宣传为传统塑料的可持续替代品。然而,关于它们在有关条件下的降解,特别是在复合成商业产品时的降解,存在着重大的知识差距。为此,本研究在模拟工业堆肥条件下调查了十种商用生物降解塑料产品的分解。测试产品包括聚乳酸(PLA)、聚己二酸丁二酯(PBAT)/淀粉或聚羟基烷酸酯(PHA)的聚合物组合物,涵盖柔性和刚性塑料。这些产品包括三个垃圾袋,一个垃圾袋拉绳,一个食品袋(柔性塑料),两个花盆,一个食品容器,一个盘子,一个盖子(硬质塑料)。在被测试的产品中,有九种是作为可堆肥产品销售的。其中,六个通过了欧洲标准EN 13432可堆肥包装认证,两个持有TÜV奥地利的“OK堆肥之家”认证,一个被标记为可堆肥,但缺乏认证。此外,一种产品被标记为100%可生物降解,但缺乏认证,并且产品可以生物降解的环境没有指定。崩解是根据ISO 20200在58°C和55%水分含量下进行的90天的实验室规模试验中确定的。结果表明,崩解度在75 ~ 100%之间,有5种产品达到完全崩解。然而,有两种产品的分解率只有75%。崩解试验后,通过光镜检查小于2mm的堆肥颗粒的微塑料(MPs)。在10种可生物降解塑料产品中,有两种在堆肥筛中检测到MPs,而在传统塑料中没有检测到MPs。值得注意的是,目视检查是在没有预处理堆肥基质的情况下进行的,因为使用化学物质进行氧化消化时观察到可生物降解塑料的降解。考虑到没有预处理的肉眼观察MPs的局限性,未来的研究应优先开发从堆肥等复杂基质中提取可生物降解MPs的方法。增强的提取方法对于了解堆肥作为环境中MPs来源的潜在作用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disintegration of commercial biodegradable plastic products under simulated industrial composting conditions.

Biodegradable plastics are often promoted as sustainable alternatives to conventional plastics. Nevertheless, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding their degradation under relevant conditions, particularly when compounded into commercial products. To this end, the present research investigates the disintegration of ten commercially available biodegradable plastic products under simulated industrial composting conditions. The tested products included polymer compositions of either polylactic acid (PLA), polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT)/starch, or polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), covering both flexible and rigid plastics. These products comprised three waste bags, one waste bag drawstring, one food bag (flexible plastics), two flower pots, one food container, one plate, and one lid (rigid plastics). Among the tested products, nine were marketed as compostable. Of these, six were certified under the European standard EN 13432 for compostable packaging, two held TÜV Austria's "OK compost home" certification, and one was labeled as compostable but lacked certification. Additionally, one product was labeled as 100% biodegradable but lacked certification, and the environment in which the product could biodegrade was not specified. Disintegration was determined according to ISO 20200 in laboratory scale tests conducted at 58 °C with 55% moisture content over 90 days. Results showed disintegration degrees ranging from 75 to 100%, with five products achieving complete disintegration. Two products, however, reached only 75% disintegration. Following the disintegration test, compost particles smaller than 2 mm were examined for microplastics (MPs) via light microscopy. MPs were detected in compost undersieves for two of the ten biodegradable plastic products, while no MPs were detected for the conventional plastics. Notably, the visual inspection was performed without pretreating the compost matrix due to the observed degradation of biodegradable plastics when using chemicals for oxidative digestion. Considering the limitations of visual MP observation without pretreatment, future research should prioritize the development of methods for extracting biodegradable MPs from complex matrices like compost. Enhanced extraction methods are essential for understanding compost's potential role as a source of MPs in the environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信