两种可视化方法对人工耳蜗植入过程中听觉和前庭功能的影响。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004450
Theda Eichler, Antonia Lakomek, Laura Waschkies, Moritz Meyer, Stephan Lang, Ben Williges, Eric Deuss, Diana Arweiler-Harbeck
{"title":"两种可视化方法对人工耳蜗植入过程中听觉和前庭功能的影响。","authors":"Theda Eichler, Antonia Lakomek, Laura Waschkies, Moritz Meyer, Stephan Lang, Ben Williges, Eric Deuss, Diana Arweiler-Harbeck","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates the impact of two distinct visualization methods for electrocochleographic potentials during cochlear implant electrode insertion on residual hearing preservation and vestibular function. Previous research has demonstrated the benefits of visualizing electrocochleographic (ECochG) potentials in preserving residual hearing during cochlear implantation. In this project, ECochG potentials are represented either through a graph or as arrows that provide a pre-interpreted version of the graph. We aim to determine if these visualization methods influence postoperative residual hearing and vestibular structure integrity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Residual hearing is audiometrically assessed, and vestibular function is evaluated using the video head impulse test and the dizziness handicap inventory before and after surgery. Furthermore, the subjective workload of surgeons using these methods is assessed via the NASA-Task Load Index questionnaire. The study included 31 patients receiving Flex26 and Flex28 electrodes (MED EL). The patients were randomly assigned to one of the visualization methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the study demonstrate that there were no significant differences between the two visualization methods, both in terms of residual hearing preservation and postoperative dizziness. Also the ECochG parameters, such as amplitude, do not differ significantly. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the surgical workload for the operating surgeon.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The two visualization methods can therefore be used equivalently in terms of preservation of cochlear structures and mental workload for the surgeons. A simplified ECochG potential interpretation could enable younger surgeons to perform more atraumatic insertions with stable quality of outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":"46 4","pages":"e98-e104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Two Visualization Methods for Electrocochleographic Potentials on Hearing and Vestibular Function During Cochlear Implantation.\",\"authors\":\"Theda Eichler, Antonia Lakomek, Laura Waschkies, Moritz Meyer, Stephan Lang, Ben Williges, Eric Deuss, Diana Arweiler-Harbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates the impact of two distinct visualization methods for electrocochleographic potentials during cochlear implant electrode insertion on residual hearing preservation and vestibular function. Previous research has demonstrated the benefits of visualizing electrocochleographic (ECochG) potentials in preserving residual hearing during cochlear implantation. In this project, ECochG potentials are represented either through a graph or as arrows that provide a pre-interpreted version of the graph. We aim to determine if these visualization methods influence postoperative residual hearing and vestibular structure integrity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Residual hearing is audiometrically assessed, and vestibular function is evaluated using the video head impulse test and the dizziness handicap inventory before and after surgery. Furthermore, the subjective workload of surgeons using these methods is assessed via the NASA-Task Load Index questionnaire. The study included 31 patients receiving Flex26 and Flex28 electrodes (MED EL). The patients were randomly assigned to one of the visualization methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the study demonstrate that there were no significant differences between the two visualization methods, both in terms of residual hearing preservation and postoperative dizziness. Also the ECochG parameters, such as amplitude, do not differ significantly. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the surgical workload for the operating surgeon.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The two visualization methods can therefore be used equivalently in terms of preservation of cochlear structures and mental workload for the surgeons. A simplified ECochG potential interpretation could enable younger surgeons to perform more atraumatic insertions with stable quality of outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"e98-e104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004450\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004450","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨人工耳蜗电极置入过程中两种不同的耳蜗电位可视化方法对残余听力保存和前庭功能的影响。先前的研究已经证明了可视化耳蜗电图(ECochG)电位在保留人工耳蜗植入期间残余听力方面的好处。在这个项目中,ECochG电位要么通过图表表示,要么用箭头表示,箭头提供了图表的预解释版本。我们的目的是确定这些可视化方法是否影响术后残余听力和前庭结构的完整性。方法:采用听力学方法评估残听,术前、术后分别采用视像头脉冲试验和眩晕障碍量表评估前庭功能。此外,使用这些方法的外科医生的主观工作量通过nasa任务负荷指数问卷进行评估。该研究包括31例接受Flex26和Flex28电极(MED EL)的患者。患者被随机分配到其中一种可视化方法。结果:本研究结果显示,两种可视化方法在残余听力保留和术后头晕方面均无显著差异。振幅等ECochG参数也无显著差异。此外,在手术医生的手术工作量方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:两种可视化方法在保留耳蜗结构和减轻外科医生的精神负荷方面具有同等的应用价值。简化的ECochG电位解释可以使年轻的外科医生进行更多的无创伤插入,结果质量稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Two Visualization Methods for Electrocochleographic Potentials on Hearing and Vestibular Function During Cochlear Implantation.

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of two distinct visualization methods for electrocochleographic potentials during cochlear implant electrode insertion on residual hearing preservation and vestibular function. Previous research has demonstrated the benefits of visualizing electrocochleographic (ECochG) potentials in preserving residual hearing during cochlear implantation. In this project, ECochG potentials are represented either through a graph or as arrows that provide a pre-interpreted version of the graph. We aim to determine if these visualization methods influence postoperative residual hearing and vestibular structure integrity.

Methods: Residual hearing is audiometrically assessed, and vestibular function is evaluated using the video head impulse test and the dizziness handicap inventory before and after surgery. Furthermore, the subjective workload of surgeons using these methods is assessed via the NASA-Task Load Index questionnaire. The study included 31 patients receiving Flex26 and Flex28 electrodes (MED EL). The patients were randomly assigned to one of the visualization methods.

Results: The results of the study demonstrate that there were no significant differences between the two visualization methods, both in terms of residual hearing preservation and postoperative dizziness. Also the ECochG parameters, such as amplitude, do not differ significantly. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the surgical workload for the operating surgeon.

Conclusion: The two visualization methods can therefore be used equivalently in terms of preservation of cochlear structures and mental workload for the surgeons. A simplified ECochG potential interpretation could enable younger surgeons to perform more atraumatic insertions with stable quality of outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信