Rodolfo Baptista Giffoni, Gabriele Dos Santos, Ricardo Santos Aguiar, Lucas Costa Lins, Marcelo Leandro Santana Cruz, Adriano Damasceno Lima
{"title":"内镜引导下中耳胆脂瘤切除术:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Rodolfo Baptista Giffoni, Gabriele Dos Santos, Ricardo Santos Aguiar, Lucas Costa Lins, Marcelo Leandro Santana Cruz, Adriano Damasceno Lima","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic-guided versus microscopic endaural and canal wall up approaches in the resection of middle ear cholesteatoma in both adult and pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2024, covering studies published between 2004 and 2024. Cohort and randomized trials addressing middle ear cholesteatoma resection were included. Excluded were studies with unequal disease extent, canal wall down surgeries, other unrelated otological procedures, and nonlongitudinal studies. Screening of studies and assessment of the risk of bias were performed independently by two pairs of blinded authors. Data abstraction adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,134 cases from 13 studies were included. In the endoscope group, there was a significant reduction in the risk of residual cholesteatoma (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.89). No significant differences were observed between the groups for postoperative tympanic membrane perforation or cartilage graft displacement. Similarly, postoperative complications, such as disturbances in taste sensation and transient vertigo, did not differ significantly between the two approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic-guided resection is superior to microscopic surgery in terms of residual cholesteatoma resection, with no significant difference in postoperative complications or tympanic membrane status.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":"46 4","pages":"418-424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic-Guided Resection of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rodolfo Baptista Giffoni, Gabriele Dos Santos, Ricardo Santos Aguiar, Lucas Costa Lins, Marcelo Leandro Santana Cruz, Adriano Damasceno Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic-guided versus microscopic endaural and canal wall up approaches in the resection of middle ear cholesteatoma in both adult and pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2024, covering studies published between 2004 and 2024. Cohort and randomized trials addressing middle ear cholesteatoma resection were included. Excluded were studies with unequal disease extent, canal wall down surgeries, other unrelated otological procedures, and nonlongitudinal studies. Screening of studies and assessment of the risk of bias were performed independently by two pairs of blinded authors. Data abstraction adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,134 cases from 13 studies were included. In the endoscope group, there was a significant reduction in the risk of residual cholesteatoma (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.89). No significant differences were observed between the groups for postoperative tympanic membrane perforation or cartilage graft displacement. Similarly, postoperative complications, such as disturbances in taste sensation and transient vertigo, did not differ significantly between the two approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic-guided resection is superior to microscopic surgery in terms of residual cholesteatoma resection, with no significant difference in postoperative complications or tympanic membrane status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"418-424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004447\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在比较内窥镜引导下与显微镜下的耳内和管壁上入路在成人和儿童中耳胆脂瘤切除术中的效果。方法:综合检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central Register of Controlled Trials),检索时间截止到2024年4月,涵盖2004年至2024年间发表的研究。纳入了中耳胆脂瘤切除术的队列和随机试验。排除了疾病程度不等的研究、管壁下降手术、其他不相关的耳科手术和非纵向研究。研究筛选和偏倚风险评估由两对盲法作者独立进行。数据提取遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。结果:13项研究共纳入1134例病例。在内窥镜组中,残留胆脂瘤的风险显著降低(RR, 0.65;95% ci, 0.47-0.89)。两组患者术后鼓膜穿孔和软骨移位无明显差异。同样,术后并发症,如味觉障碍和短暂性眩晕,在两种入路之间没有显著差异。结论:内镜引导下切除残余胆脂瘤优于显微手术,术后并发症及鼓膜状态无明显差异。
Endoscopic-Guided Resection of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Objective: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic-guided versus microscopic endaural and canal wall up approaches in the resection of middle ear cholesteatoma in both adult and pediatric patients.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2024, covering studies published between 2004 and 2024. Cohort and randomized trials addressing middle ear cholesteatoma resection were included. Excluded were studies with unequal disease extent, canal wall down surgeries, other unrelated otological procedures, and nonlongitudinal studies. Screening of studies and assessment of the risk of bias were performed independently by two pairs of blinded authors. Data abstraction adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.
Results: A total of 1,134 cases from 13 studies were included. In the endoscope group, there was a significant reduction in the risk of residual cholesteatoma (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.89). No significant differences were observed between the groups for postoperative tympanic membrane perforation or cartilage graft displacement. Similarly, postoperative complications, such as disturbances in taste sensation and transient vertigo, did not differ significantly between the two approaches.
Conclusions: Endoscopic-guided resection is superior to microscopic surgery in terms of residual cholesteatoma resection, with no significant difference in postoperative complications or tympanic membrane status.
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.