改良髋关节囊周神经阻滞对全髋关节置换术后疼痛和功能结局的影响:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jian Hu, Qiuru Wang, Jie Hu, Chunyu Gong, Jing Yang
{"title":"改良髋关节囊周神经阻滞对全髋关节置换术后疼痛和功能结局的影响:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。","authors":"Jian Hu, Qiuru Wang, Jie Hu, Chunyu Gong, Jing Yang","doi":"10.4097/kja.24593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the hip pericapsular nerve block (hip-PNB), which combines the anterior pericapsular nerve group (PENG) and posterior pericapsular deep-gluteal (PPD) blocks, on postoperative pain and functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the posterolateral approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients undergoing THA were allocated to either the nerve block group (Group N, hip-PNB + sham local infiltration analgesia [LIA]) or the control group (Group C, sham hip-PNB + LIA). The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale pain scores at rest and during movement postoperatively, time to first rescue analgesia, cumulative morphine consumption during hospitalization, opioid consumption during surgery, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with Group C, Group N consumed significantly less morphine in the first 24 h (10 [0-10] mg vs. 10 [10-20] mg; P < 0.001) and throughout hospitalization (10 [0-20] mg vs. 20 [20-30] mg; P < 0.001) and had less opioid consumption perioperatively. Group N also had significantly lower pain scores at rest and during movement in the first 24 h, required rescue analgesia later, and had faster recovery postoperatively than Group C. No significant intergroup differences were observed in quadriceps muscle strength or postoperative complication rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to LIA, Hip-PNB has better postoperative analgesia and enhances recovery in patients undergoing THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A modified hip pericapsular nerve block on postoperative pain and functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Jian Hu, Qiuru Wang, Jie Hu, Chunyu Gong, Jing Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.4097/kja.24593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the hip pericapsular nerve block (hip-PNB), which combines the anterior pericapsular nerve group (PENG) and posterior pericapsular deep-gluteal (PPD) blocks, on postoperative pain and functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the posterolateral approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients undergoing THA were allocated to either the nerve block group (Group N, hip-PNB + sham local infiltration analgesia [LIA]) or the control group (Group C, sham hip-PNB + LIA). The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale pain scores at rest and during movement postoperatively, time to first rescue analgesia, cumulative morphine consumption during hospitalization, opioid consumption during surgery, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with Group C, Group N consumed significantly less morphine in the first 24 h (10 [0-10] mg vs. 10 [10-20] mg; P < 0.001) and throughout hospitalization (10 [0-20] mg vs. 20 [20-30] mg; P < 0.001) and had less opioid consumption perioperatively. Group N also had significantly lower pain scores at rest and during movement in the first 24 h, required rescue analgesia later, and had faster recovery postoperatively than Group C. No significant intergroup differences were observed in quadriceps muscle strength or postoperative complication rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to LIA, Hip-PNB has better postoperative analgesia and enhances recovery in patients undergoing THA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24593\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨髋关节包膜神经阻滞(hip- pnb)的有效性和安全性,该方法结合了囊前神经组(PENG)和囊后深臀(PPD)阻滞,通过后外侧入路对全髋关节置换术(THA)术后疼痛和功能结果的影响。方法:将70例THA患者分为神经阻滞组(N组,髋关节- pnb +假性局部浸润性镇痛[LIA])和对照组(C组,假性髋关节- pnb + LIA)。主要观察指标为术后24小时内吗啡的累计用量。次要结局包括术后休息和运动时的视觉模拟疼痛评分、首次急救镇痛时间、住院期间吗啡累积消耗、手术期间阿片类药物消耗、术后恢复和术后并发症。结果:与C组比较,N组前24 h吗啡用量明显减少(10 [0 ~ 10]mg vs. 10 [10 ~ 20] mg;P < 0.001)和整个住院期间(10 [0-20]mg vs. 20 [20-30] mg;P < 0.001),围手术期阿片类药物消耗较少。N组在休息和运动时的疼痛评分也明显低于c组,随后需要紧急镇痛,术后恢复速度也比c组快。在股四头肌力量和术后并发症发生率方面,组间差异无统计学意义。结论:与LIA相比,Hip-PNB具有更好的术后镇痛效果,并能促进THA患者的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A modified hip pericapsular nerve block on postoperative pain and functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study.

Background: This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the hip pericapsular nerve block (hip-PNB), which combines the anterior pericapsular nerve group (PENG) and posterior pericapsular deep-gluteal (PPD) blocks, on postoperative pain and functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the posterolateral approach.

Methods: Seventy patients undergoing THA were allocated to either the nerve block group (Group N, hip-PNB + sham local infiltration analgesia [LIA]) or the control group (Group C, sham hip-PNB + LIA). The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale pain scores at rest and during movement postoperatively, time to first rescue analgesia, cumulative morphine consumption during hospitalization, opioid consumption during surgery, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications.

Results: Compared with Group C, Group N consumed significantly less morphine in the first 24 h (10 [0-10] mg vs. 10 [10-20] mg; P < 0.001) and throughout hospitalization (10 [0-20] mg vs. 20 [20-30] mg; P < 0.001) and had less opioid consumption perioperatively. Group N also had significantly lower pain scores at rest and during movement in the first 24 h, required rescue analgesia later, and had faster recovery postoperatively than Group C. No significant intergroup differences were observed in quadriceps muscle strength or postoperative complication rates.

Conclusions: Compared to LIA, Hip-PNB has better postoperative analgesia and enhances recovery in patients undergoing THA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信