基于ASPEN重症监护营养支持指南测量静息能量消耗和预测静息能量消耗:一项协议研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Kiara Gaspari, Jessica Flechner-Klein, Tamara R Cohen, Courtney Wedemire
{"title":"基于ASPEN重症监护营养支持指南测量静息能量消耗和预测静息能量消耗:一项协议研究。","authors":"Kiara Gaspari, Jessica Flechner-Klein, Tamara R Cohen, Courtney Wedemire","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predictive equations often inaccurately estimate energy needs in critically ill patients. This study evaluated the level of agreement between resting energy expenditure using 12 and 25 kcal/kg as recommended by the 2021 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition critical care guidelines for nutrition support and energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry in patients in the intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An agreement study was conducted on mechanically ventilated adults who had a documented measured energy expenditure within 10 days of intensive care unit admission. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m² using actual body weight, adjusted body weight, and ideal body weight. Correlations between measured energy expenditure and patient characteristics were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients were included and were a median age of 64 years, 63.8% male, and a median body mass index of 28.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The 12 kcal/kg and 25 kcal/kg differed significantly from measured energy expenditure (P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed mean biases of -644.6 kcal/day for 12 kcal/kg and 406.5 kcal/day for 25 kcal/kg. In the body mass index ≥30 kg/m² subgroup (n = 22), 12 kcal/kg underestimated measured energy expenditure across all weights, and 25 kcal/kg was more accurate when using ideal or adjusted body weights.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Predicted energy expenditure using 12 kcal/kg and 25 kcal/kg based on the 2021 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition critical care guidelines for nutrition support had poor agreement with measured energy expenditure in mechanically ventilated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measured resting energy expenditure and predicted resting energy expenditure based on ASPEN critical care guidelines for nutrition support: An agreement study.\",\"authors\":\"Kiara Gaspari, Jessica Flechner-Klein, Tamara R Cohen, Courtney Wedemire\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpen.2744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predictive equations often inaccurately estimate energy needs in critically ill patients. This study evaluated the level of agreement between resting energy expenditure using 12 and 25 kcal/kg as recommended by the 2021 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition critical care guidelines for nutrition support and energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry in patients in the intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An agreement study was conducted on mechanically ventilated adults who had a documented measured energy expenditure within 10 days of intensive care unit admission. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m² using actual body weight, adjusted body weight, and ideal body weight. Correlations between measured energy expenditure and patient characteristics were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients were included and were a median age of 64 years, 63.8% male, and a median body mass index of 28.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The 12 kcal/kg and 25 kcal/kg differed significantly from measured energy expenditure (P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed mean biases of -644.6 kcal/day for 12 kcal/kg and 406.5 kcal/day for 25 kcal/kg. In the body mass index ≥30 kg/m² subgroup (n = 22), 12 kcal/kg underestimated measured energy expenditure across all weights, and 25 kcal/kg was more accurate when using ideal or adjusted body weights.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Predicted energy expenditure using 12 kcal/kg and 25 kcal/kg based on the 2021 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition critical care guidelines for nutrition support had poor agreement with measured energy expenditure in mechanically ventilated patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2744\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2744","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预测方程往往不能准确地估计危重病人的能量需求。本研究评估了2021年美国肠外和肠内营养学会重症监护指南中推荐的12和25千卡/千克静息能量消耗与间接量热法测量重症监护病房患者营养支持和能量消耗之间的一致程度。方法:一项协议研究对机械通气的成年人进行了研究,这些成年人在重症监护病房入院10天内记录了测量的能量消耗。一致性评估采用Bland-Altman图和Wilcoxon签署秩检验。采用实际体重、调整体重和理想体重对体重指数≥30 kg/m²的患者进行亚组分析。测量的能量消耗与患者特征之间的相关性也进行了探讨。结果:纳入患者58例,中位年龄64岁,男性占63.8%,中位体重指数28.0 kg/m2。12 kcal/kg和25 kcal/kg与测量的能量消耗有显著差异(P结论:根据2021年美国肠外和肠内营养学会营养支持重症监护指南,使用12 kcal/kg和25 kcal/kg预测的能量消耗与机械通气患者测量的能量消耗不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measured resting energy expenditure and predicted resting energy expenditure based on ASPEN critical care guidelines for nutrition support: An agreement study.

Background: Predictive equations often inaccurately estimate energy needs in critically ill patients. This study evaluated the level of agreement between resting energy expenditure using 12 and 25 kcal/kg as recommended by the 2021 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition critical care guidelines for nutrition support and energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry in patients in the intensive care unit.

Methods: An agreement study was conducted on mechanically ventilated adults who had a documented measured energy expenditure within 10 days of intensive care unit admission. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m² using actual body weight, adjusted body weight, and ideal body weight. Correlations between measured energy expenditure and patient characteristics were also explored.

Results: Fifty-eight patients were included and were a median age of 64 years, 63.8% male, and a median body mass index of 28.0 kg/m2. The 12 kcal/kg and 25 kcal/kg differed significantly from measured energy expenditure (P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed mean biases of -644.6 kcal/day for 12 kcal/kg and 406.5 kcal/day for 25 kcal/kg. In the body mass index ≥30 kg/m² subgroup (n = 22), 12 kcal/kg underestimated measured energy expenditure across all weights, and 25 kcal/kg was more accurate when using ideal or adjusted body weights.

Conclusions: Predicted energy expenditure using 12 kcal/kg and 25 kcal/kg based on the 2021 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition critical care guidelines for nutrition support had poor agreement with measured energy expenditure in mechanically ventilated patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (JPEN) is the premier scientific journal of nutrition and metabolic support. It publishes original peer-reviewed studies that define the cutting edge of basic and clinical research in the field. It explores the science of optimizing the care of patients receiving enteral or IV therapies. Also included: reviews, techniques, brief reports, case reports, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信