COVID-19大流行期间妊娠期糖尿病诊断标准变化的影响

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jessica Neville, Kelly Foley, Seán Lacey, Antoinette Tuthill, Oratile Kgosidialwa, Mairead O'Riordan, Fiona O'Halloran, Seán J Costelloe
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间妊娠期糖尿病诊断标准变化的影响","authors":"Jessica Neville, Kelly Foley, Seán Lacey, Antoinette Tuthill, Oratile Kgosidialwa, Mairead O'Riordan, Fiona O'Halloran, Seán J Costelloe","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-03926-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Health Service Executive (HSE) and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) recommended fasting and random plasma glucose (FPG/RPG) alongside glycated haemoglobin (HbA<sub>1c</sub>) to replace the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for diagnosing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study compared testing patterns and diagnostic rates for GDM before and after implementing the RCOG guidelines (01/05/2020) in pregnancies beginning 01/11/2018 to 31/03/2021. Trends were inspected using Cochrane-Armitage tests. Differences between General Practice (GP) and Secondary Care (SCare) were assessed by chi-square analysis. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used for all analyses. Information on maternal and pregnancy characteristics was accessed where available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data indicated a significant reduction in OGTTs requested by GPs and SCare. Conversely, HbA<sub>1c</sub>, FPG and RPG test requests increased significantly in both locations. The overall GDM positivity rate increased significantly from 7.4% to 22.0% in GP and 16.9% to 39.0% in SCare following RCOG guideline implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RCOG guidelines appear to have been well adopted by GPs and SCare, with greater adherence in SCare. Using FPG, RPG and HbA<sub>1c</sub> to a greater extent than the OGTT corresponded with increased GDM diagnostic rates. Given the difficulties with interpreting HbA<sub>1c</sub> in pregnancy, its routine use in diagnosing GDM requires further careful consideration. Relaying changes in diagnostic protocol during pandemics requires strong communication with all requesting clinicians, including GPs. Comparisons between GP and SCare indicated significant differences in test-requesting practices and GDM positivity rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of changes in gestational diabetes mellitus diagnostic criteria during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Neville, Kelly Foley, Seán Lacey, Antoinette Tuthill, Oratile Kgosidialwa, Mairead O'Riordan, Fiona O'Halloran, Seán J Costelloe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11845-025-03926-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Health Service Executive (HSE) and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) recommended fasting and random plasma glucose (FPG/RPG) alongside glycated haemoglobin (HbA<sub>1c</sub>) to replace the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for diagnosing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study compared testing patterns and diagnostic rates for GDM before and after implementing the RCOG guidelines (01/05/2020) in pregnancies beginning 01/11/2018 to 31/03/2021. Trends were inspected using Cochrane-Armitage tests. Differences between General Practice (GP) and Secondary Care (SCare) were assessed by chi-square analysis. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used for all analyses. Information on maternal and pregnancy characteristics was accessed where available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data indicated a significant reduction in OGTTs requested by GPs and SCare. Conversely, HbA<sub>1c</sub>, FPG and RPG test requests increased significantly in both locations. The overall GDM positivity rate increased significantly from 7.4% to 22.0% in GP and 16.9% to 39.0% in SCare following RCOG guideline implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RCOG guidelines appear to have been well adopted by GPs and SCare, with greater adherence in SCare. Using FPG, RPG and HbA<sub>1c</sub> to a greater extent than the OGTT corresponded with increased GDM diagnostic rates. Given the difficulties with interpreting HbA<sub>1c</sub> in pregnancy, its routine use in diagnosing GDM requires further careful consideration. Relaying changes in diagnostic protocol during pandemics requires strong communication with all requesting clinicians, including GPs. Comparisons between GP and SCare indicated significant differences in test-requesting practices and GDM positivity rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03926-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03926-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,英国卫生服务执行局(HSE)和皇家妇产科学院(RCOG)推荐空腹和随机血糖(FPG/RPG)以及糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)来取代口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)来诊断妊娠糖尿病(GDM)。方法:比较2018年11月1日至2021年3月31日实施RCOG指南(2020年5月1日)前后妊娠期GDM的检测模式和诊断率。使用Cochrane-Armitage检验趋势。采用卡方分析评估全科(GP)和二级护理(SCare)之间的差异。结果:数据显示gp和SCare要求的ogtt显著减少。相反,这两个地区的HbA1c、FPG和RPG检测需求显著增加。RCOG指南实施后,GP的GDM总阳性率从7.4%显著增加到22.0%,SCare的GDM总阳性率从16.9%显著增加到39.0%。结论:RCOG指南似乎已被全科医生和SCare很好地采用,并且在SCare中有更大的依从性。与OGTT相比,FPG、RPG和HbA1c的使用更大程度上增加了GDM的诊断率。考虑到妊娠期HbA1c的解释困难,其在诊断GDM中的常规应用需要进一步仔细考虑。在大流行期间通报诊断方案的变化需要与所有提出请求的临床医生(包括全科医生)进行强有力的沟通。GP和SCare之间的比较表明,在要求测试的做法和GDM阳性率方面存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of changes in gestational diabetes mellitus diagnostic criteria during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background/aims: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Health Service Executive (HSE) and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) recommended fasting and random plasma glucose (FPG/RPG) alongside glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) to replace the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for diagnosing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM).

Methods: The study compared testing patterns and diagnostic rates for GDM before and after implementing the RCOG guidelines (01/05/2020) in pregnancies beginning 01/11/2018 to 31/03/2021. Trends were inspected using Cochrane-Armitage tests. Differences between General Practice (GP) and Secondary Care (SCare) were assessed by chi-square analysis. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used for all analyses. Information on maternal and pregnancy characteristics was accessed where available.

Results: Data indicated a significant reduction in OGTTs requested by GPs and SCare. Conversely, HbA1c, FPG and RPG test requests increased significantly in both locations. The overall GDM positivity rate increased significantly from 7.4% to 22.0% in GP and 16.9% to 39.0% in SCare following RCOG guideline implementation.

Conclusions: The RCOG guidelines appear to have been well adopted by GPs and SCare, with greater adherence in SCare. Using FPG, RPG and HbA1c to a greater extent than the OGTT corresponded with increased GDM diagnostic rates. Given the difficulties with interpreting HbA1c in pregnancy, its routine use in diagnosing GDM requires further careful consideration. Relaying changes in diagnostic protocol during pandemics requires strong communication with all requesting clinicians, including GPs. Comparisons between GP and SCare indicated significant differences in test-requesting practices and GDM positivity rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信