当前指导的环境扫描:培养英国心胸外科的下一代。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Michelle Lee, Georgia R Layton, Elizabeth Belcher, Deborah Harrington, Gillian Hardman, Betsy Evans, Narain Moorjani, Karen Booth
{"title":"当前指导的环境扫描:培养英国心胸外科的下一代。","authors":"Michelle Lee, Georgia R Layton, Elizabeth Belcher, Deborah Harrington, Gillian Hardman, Betsy Evans, Narain Moorjani, Karen Booth","doi":"10.1186/s13019-024-03240-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mentorship is critical to the professional development of junior colleagues in cardiothoracic surgery. Despite its presumed importance and frequent discussion, its impact within cardiothoracic surgery training remains uncharacterised within the UK. We aimed to evaluate mentorship experience and identify gaps in the system of mentorship education. The differences between men and women's views on mentorship are also considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively collected of 92 responses [50 M:42 F] over 18 weeks. 'Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland (SCTS) Critically Appraising mentorship' survey was formulated using electronic questionnaire system and distributed via emails to health professionals and medical students by using SCTS membership directory. The survey domains explore respondents' demographics, current or previous academic appointments, leadership roles, experience of mentorship, and opinions regarding ideal implementation of mentorship model, including the views on necessity for racial and gender concordance between mentor and mentee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>43% of respondents (40/92) had less than 5 years of experience in practice, but in general men were more experienced than women with over 15 years of practice (40% versus 9.52%) (p = 0.01). Women are more likely to change their practice due to favourable work-life balance (40%, 4/10) or due to financial incentives (40%, 4/10). On the other hand, men were mostly likely to transit due to career specialisation (38.1%, 8/21) (p = 0.014). 48% of respondents (45/92) have a system of mentorship in the current practice, but 66.67% (30/92) did not have formal evaluations. All male participants did not think gender of mentor/mentee was important, but 21.43% (9/42) of women did (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The need for mentorship programme is widely recognised and is imperative to achieve maximum career potential, both professionally and personally. The key will be to establish more structured mentoring programme, finding apposite mentor-mentee dyad, predefining mentorship need, and recognising the unique needs associated with the mentee's identity. Women face unique challenges as a minority, and this must be considered when forming mentorship relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An environmental scan of current mentorship: fostering the next generations in cardiothoracic surgery in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Lee, Georgia R Layton, Elizabeth Belcher, Deborah Harrington, Gillian Hardman, Betsy Evans, Narain Moorjani, Karen Booth\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13019-024-03240-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mentorship is critical to the professional development of junior colleagues in cardiothoracic surgery. Despite its presumed importance and frequent discussion, its impact within cardiothoracic surgery training remains uncharacterised within the UK. We aimed to evaluate mentorship experience and identify gaps in the system of mentorship education. The differences between men and women's views on mentorship are also considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively collected of 92 responses [50 M:42 F] over 18 weeks. 'Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland (SCTS) Critically Appraising mentorship' survey was formulated using electronic questionnaire system and distributed via emails to health professionals and medical students by using SCTS membership directory. The survey domains explore respondents' demographics, current or previous academic appointments, leadership roles, experience of mentorship, and opinions regarding ideal implementation of mentorship model, including the views on necessity for racial and gender concordance between mentor and mentee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>43% of respondents (40/92) had less than 5 years of experience in practice, but in general men were more experienced than women with over 15 years of practice (40% versus 9.52%) (p = 0.01). Women are more likely to change their practice due to favourable work-life balance (40%, 4/10) or due to financial incentives (40%, 4/10). On the other hand, men were mostly likely to transit due to career specialisation (38.1%, 8/21) (p = 0.014). 48% of respondents (45/92) have a system of mentorship in the current practice, but 66.67% (30/92) did not have formal evaluations. All male participants did not think gender of mentor/mentee was important, but 21.43% (9/42) of women did (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The need for mentorship programme is widely recognised and is imperative to achieve maximum career potential, both professionally and personally. The key will be to establish more structured mentoring programme, finding apposite mentor-mentee dyad, predefining mentorship need, and recognising the unique needs associated with the mentee's identity. Women face unique challenges as a minority, and this must be considered when forming mentorship relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-03240-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-03240-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:指导对心胸外科初级医师的专业发展至关重要。尽管其假定的重要性和频繁的讨论,其在心胸外科培训的影响仍然没有表征在英国。我们的目的是评估师徒关系的经验,并找出师徒关系教育系统的差距。本文还考虑了男女对师徒关系的不同看法。方法:我们在18周内前瞻性地收集了92例应答[50 M:42 F]。“英国及爱尔兰心胸外科学会(SCTS)批判性评估指导”调查采用电子问卷系统制定,并通过SCTS会员目录通过电子邮件分发给卫生专业人员和医学生。调查领域探讨了受访者的人口统计、当前或以前的学术任命、领导角色、师徒经历以及对师徒模式理想实施的看法,包括对导师和学员之间种族和性别和谐的必要性的看法。结果:43%的被调查者(40/92)从业经验不足5年,但总体而言,从业经验超过15年的男性多于女性(40%比9.52%)(p = 0.01)。女性更有可能因为良好的工作与生活平衡(40%,4/10)或经济激励(40%,4/10)而改变自己的做法。另一方面,男性因职业专业化而转移的可能性最大(38.1%,8/21)(p = 0.014)。48%的受访者(45/92)在目前的实践中有师徒制度,66.67%(30/92)没有正式的评估。所有男性参与者认为导师/被指导者的性别不重要,而21.43%(9/42)的女性参与者认为性别重要(p = 0.002)。结论:师徒计划的必要性得到了广泛认可,对于实现职业和个人的最大职业潜力都是必不可少的。关键在于建立更有组织的指导计划,找到合适的导师和学员组合,预先定义导师需求,并认识到与学员身份相关的独特需求。女性作为少数群体面临着独特的挑战,在建立师徒关系时必须考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An environmental scan of current mentorship: fostering the next generations in cardiothoracic surgery in the UK.

Objectives: Mentorship is critical to the professional development of junior colleagues in cardiothoracic surgery. Despite its presumed importance and frequent discussion, its impact within cardiothoracic surgery training remains uncharacterised within the UK. We aimed to evaluate mentorship experience and identify gaps in the system of mentorship education. The differences between men and women's views on mentorship are also considered.

Methods: We prospectively collected of 92 responses [50 M:42 F] over 18 weeks. 'Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland (SCTS) Critically Appraising mentorship' survey was formulated using electronic questionnaire system and distributed via emails to health professionals and medical students by using SCTS membership directory. The survey domains explore respondents' demographics, current or previous academic appointments, leadership roles, experience of mentorship, and opinions regarding ideal implementation of mentorship model, including the views on necessity for racial and gender concordance between mentor and mentee.

Results: 43% of respondents (40/92) had less than 5 years of experience in practice, but in general men were more experienced than women with over 15 years of practice (40% versus 9.52%) (p = 0.01). Women are more likely to change their practice due to favourable work-life balance (40%, 4/10) or due to financial incentives (40%, 4/10). On the other hand, men were mostly likely to transit due to career specialisation (38.1%, 8/21) (p = 0.014). 48% of respondents (45/92) have a system of mentorship in the current practice, but 66.67% (30/92) did not have formal evaluations. All male participants did not think gender of mentor/mentee was important, but 21.43% (9/42) of women did (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: The need for mentorship programme is widely recognised and is imperative to achieve maximum career potential, both professionally and personally. The key will be to establish more structured mentoring programme, finding apposite mentor-mentee dyad, predefining mentorship need, and recognising the unique needs associated with the mentee's identity. Women face unique challenges as a minority, and this must be considered when forming mentorship relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信