半球不对称,古神经学,和人类的进化。

Q2 Medicine
Emiliano Bruner
{"title":"半球不对称,古神经学,和人类的进化。","authors":"Emiliano Bruner","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-443-15646-5.00026-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain asymmetries are a distinctive feature of Homo sapiens and are associated with key evolutionary functions including language and handedness. Nonetheless, differences between humans and apes could be just a matter of degree and size and not the expression of unique traits of our species. In this chapter, I introduce paleoneurology and the study of brain morphology in fossil hominids, reviewing the anatomic factors that can influence the main asymmetries of the endocranial cavity (cortical volumes, sulcal patterns, and craniovascular features). The paleoneurological evidence suggests that most extinct human species displayed a pattern of gross endocranial asymmetries similar to modern humans. In addition, the behavioral information on handedness also points to a similar degree of laterality in archaic species of the human genus and in Neandertals. At present, there is therefore no evidence suggesting that the brain asymmetries in H. sapiens are part of a derived set of features. Of course, even a simple proportional change due to brain size increase can anyway prompt crucial cognitive changes, mostly if threshold effects are considered. Nonetheless, we still lack much information in basic anatomy to support consistent hypotheses on the biologic factors involved in endocranial asymmetries in fossil hominids. This missing information concerns endocranial morphogenesis and topology, spatial conflicts and constraints, the biomechanical balance between cerebral tissues, and the actual histologic changes associated with encephalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":"208 ","pages":"231-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemispheric asymmetries, paleoneurology, and the evolution of the human genus.\",\"authors\":\"Emiliano Bruner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/B978-0-443-15646-5.00026-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Brain asymmetries are a distinctive feature of Homo sapiens and are associated with key evolutionary functions including language and handedness. Nonetheless, differences between humans and apes could be just a matter of degree and size and not the expression of unique traits of our species. In this chapter, I introduce paleoneurology and the study of brain morphology in fossil hominids, reviewing the anatomic factors that can influence the main asymmetries of the endocranial cavity (cortical volumes, sulcal patterns, and craniovascular features). The paleoneurological evidence suggests that most extinct human species displayed a pattern of gross endocranial asymmetries similar to modern humans. In addition, the behavioral information on handedness also points to a similar degree of laterality in archaic species of the human genus and in Neandertals. At present, there is therefore no evidence suggesting that the brain asymmetries in H. sapiens are part of a derived set of features. Of course, even a simple proportional change due to brain size increase can anyway prompt crucial cognitive changes, mostly if threshold effects are considered. Nonetheless, we still lack much information in basic anatomy to support consistent hypotheses on the biologic factors involved in endocranial asymmetries in fossil hominids. This missing information concerns endocranial morphogenesis and topology, spatial conflicts and constraints, the biomechanical balance between cerebral tissues, and the actual histologic changes associated with encephalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handbook of clinical neurology\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"231-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handbook of clinical neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15646-5.00026-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of clinical neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15646-5.00026-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大脑不对称是智人的一个显著特征,与语言和利手性等关键进化功能有关。尽管如此,人类和猿类之间的差异可能只是程度和大小的问题,而不是我们物种独特特征的表达。在本章中,我将介绍古神经学和古人类化石脑形态学的研究,回顾可能影响颅内腔主要不对称的解剖学因素(皮质体积、脑沟模式和颅血管特征)。古神经学证据表明,大多数灭绝的人类物种表现出与现代人相似的大体颅内不对称模式。此外,关于惯用手的行为信息也指出,古人类和尼安德特人的侧性程度相似。因此,目前没有证据表明智人的大脑不对称是衍生出的一系列特征的一部分。当然,即使是由于大脑大小增加而导致的简单的比例变化,也会导致关键的认知变化,尤其是在考虑阈值效应的情况下。尽管如此,我们在基础解剖学方面仍然缺乏足够的信息来支持有关原始人类化石颅内不对称的生物因素的一致假设。这些缺失的信息涉及颅内形态发生和拓扑结构、空间冲突和限制、脑组织之间的生物力学平衡以及与脑化相关的实际组织学变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hemispheric asymmetries, paleoneurology, and the evolution of the human genus.

Brain asymmetries are a distinctive feature of Homo sapiens and are associated with key evolutionary functions including language and handedness. Nonetheless, differences between humans and apes could be just a matter of degree and size and not the expression of unique traits of our species. In this chapter, I introduce paleoneurology and the study of brain morphology in fossil hominids, reviewing the anatomic factors that can influence the main asymmetries of the endocranial cavity (cortical volumes, sulcal patterns, and craniovascular features). The paleoneurological evidence suggests that most extinct human species displayed a pattern of gross endocranial asymmetries similar to modern humans. In addition, the behavioral information on handedness also points to a similar degree of laterality in archaic species of the human genus and in Neandertals. At present, there is therefore no evidence suggesting that the brain asymmetries in H. sapiens are part of a derived set of features. Of course, even a simple proportional change due to brain size increase can anyway prompt crucial cognitive changes, mostly if threshold effects are considered. Nonetheless, we still lack much information in basic anatomy to support consistent hypotheses on the biologic factors involved in endocranial asymmetries in fossil hominids. This missing information concerns endocranial morphogenesis and topology, spatial conflicts and constraints, the biomechanical balance between cerebral tissues, and the actual histologic changes associated with encephalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Handbook of clinical neurology
Handbook of clinical neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: The Handbook of Clinical Neurology (HCN) was originally conceived and edited by Pierre Vinken and George Bruyn as a prestigious, multivolume reference work that would cover all the disorders encountered by clinicians and researchers engaged in neurology and allied fields. The first series of the Handbook (Volumes 1-44) was published between 1968 and 1982 and was followed by a second series (Volumes 45-78), guided by the same editors, which concluded in 2002. By that time, the Handbook had come to represent one of the largest scientific works ever published. In 2002, Professors Michael J. Aminoff, François Boller, and Dick F. Swaab took on the responsibility of supervising the third (current) series, the first volumes of which published in 2003. They have designed this series to encompass both clinical neurology and also the basic and clinical neurosciences that are its underpinning. Given the enormity and complexity of the accumulating literature, it is almost impossible to keep abreast of developments in the field, thus providing the raison d''être for the series. The series will thus appeal to clinicians and investigators alike, providing to each an added dimension. Now, more than 140 volumes after it began, the Handbook of Clinical Neurology series has an unparalleled reputation for providing the latest information on fundamental research on the operation of the nervous system in health and disease, comprehensive clinical information on neurological and related disorders, and up-to-date treatment protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信