{"title":"半球不对称,古神经学,和人类的进化。","authors":"Emiliano Bruner","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-443-15646-5.00026-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain asymmetries are a distinctive feature of Homo sapiens and are associated with key evolutionary functions including language and handedness. Nonetheless, differences between humans and apes could be just a matter of degree and size and not the expression of unique traits of our species. In this chapter, I introduce paleoneurology and the study of brain morphology in fossil hominids, reviewing the anatomic factors that can influence the main asymmetries of the endocranial cavity (cortical volumes, sulcal patterns, and craniovascular features). The paleoneurological evidence suggests that most extinct human species displayed a pattern of gross endocranial asymmetries similar to modern humans. In addition, the behavioral information on handedness also points to a similar degree of laterality in archaic species of the human genus and in Neandertals. At present, there is therefore no evidence suggesting that the brain asymmetries in H. sapiens are part of a derived set of features. Of course, even a simple proportional change due to brain size increase can anyway prompt crucial cognitive changes, mostly if threshold effects are considered. Nonetheless, we still lack much information in basic anatomy to support consistent hypotheses on the biologic factors involved in endocranial asymmetries in fossil hominids. This missing information concerns endocranial morphogenesis and topology, spatial conflicts and constraints, the biomechanical balance between cerebral tissues, and the actual histologic changes associated with encephalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":"208 ","pages":"231-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemispheric asymmetries, paleoneurology, and the evolution of the human genus.\",\"authors\":\"Emiliano Bruner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/B978-0-443-15646-5.00026-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Brain asymmetries are a distinctive feature of Homo sapiens and are associated with key evolutionary functions including language and handedness. Nonetheless, differences between humans and apes could be just a matter of degree and size and not the expression of unique traits of our species. In this chapter, I introduce paleoneurology and the study of brain morphology in fossil hominids, reviewing the anatomic factors that can influence the main asymmetries of the endocranial cavity (cortical volumes, sulcal patterns, and craniovascular features). The paleoneurological evidence suggests that most extinct human species displayed a pattern of gross endocranial asymmetries similar to modern humans. In addition, the behavioral information on handedness also points to a similar degree of laterality in archaic species of the human genus and in Neandertals. At present, there is therefore no evidence suggesting that the brain asymmetries in H. sapiens are part of a derived set of features. Of course, even a simple proportional change due to brain size increase can anyway prompt crucial cognitive changes, mostly if threshold effects are considered. Nonetheless, we still lack much information in basic anatomy to support consistent hypotheses on the biologic factors involved in endocranial asymmetries in fossil hominids. This missing information concerns endocranial morphogenesis and topology, spatial conflicts and constraints, the biomechanical balance between cerebral tissues, and the actual histologic changes associated with encephalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handbook of clinical neurology\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"231-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handbook of clinical neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15646-5.00026-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of clinical neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15646-5.00026-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hemispheric asymmetries, paleoneurology, and the evolution of the human genus.
Brain asymmetries are a distinctive feature of Homo sapiens and are associated with key evolutionary functions including language and handedness. Nonetheless, differences between humans and apes could be just a matter of degree and size and not the expression of unique traits of our species. In this chapter, I introduce paleoneurology and the study of brain morphology in fossil hominids, reviewing the anatomic factors that can influence the main asymmetries of the endocranial cavity (cortical volumes, sulcal patterns, and craniovascular features). The paleoneurological evidence suggests that most extinct human species displayed a pattern of gross endocranial asymmetries similar to modern humans. In addition, the behavioral information on handedness also points to a similar degree of laterality in archaic species of the human genus and in Neandertals. At present, there is therefore no evidence suggesting that the brain asymmetries in H. sapiens are part of a derived set of features. Of course, even a simple proportional change due to brain size increase can anyway prompt crucial cognitive changes, mostly if threshold effects are considered. Nonetheless, we still lack much information in basic anatomy to support consistent hypotheses on the biologic factors involved in endocranial asymmetries in fossil hominids. This missing information concerns endocranial morphogenesis and topology, spatial conflicts and constraints, the biomechanical balance between cerebral tissues, and the actual histologic changes associated with encephalization.
期刊介绍:
The Handbook of Clinical Neurology (HCN) was originally conceived and edited by Pierre Vinken and George Bruyn as a prestigious, multivolume reference work that would cover all the disorders encountered by clinicians and researchers engaged in neurology and allied fields. The first series of the Handbook (Volumes 1-44) was published between 1968 and 1982 and was followed by a second series (Volumes 45-78), guided by the same editors, which concluded in 2002. By that time, the Handbook had come to represent one of the largest scientific works ever published. In 2002, Professors Michael J. Aminoff, François Boller, and Dick F. Swaab took on the responsibility of supervising the third (current) series, the first volumes of which published in 2003. They have designed this series to encompass both clinical neurology and also the basic and clinical neurosciences that are its underpinning. Given the enormity and complexity of the accumulating literature, it is almost impossible to keep abreast of developments in the field, thus providing the raison d''être for the series. The series will thus appeal to clinicians and investigators alike, providing to each an added dimension. Now, more than 140 volumes after it began, the Handbook of Clinical Neurology series has an unparalleled reputation for providing the latest information on fundamental research on the operation of the nervous system in health and disease, comprehensive clinical information on neurological and related disorders, and up-to-date treatment protocols.