评估左心室辅助装置支持下连续血流患者运动时的左侧血流动力学。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sara S Inglis, Sarah D Schettle, Mauricio A Villavicencio, Philip J Spencer, John M Stulak, Paul C Tang, Sudhir S Kushwaha, Atta Behfar, Andrew N Rosenbaum
{"title":"评估左心室辅助装置支持下连续血流患者运动时的左侧血流动力学。","authors":"Sara S Inglis, Sarah D Schettle, Mauricio A Villavicencio, Philip J Spencer, John M Stulak, Paul C Tang, Sudhir S Kushwaha, Atta Behfar, Andrew N Rosenbaum","doi":"10.1111/aor.14995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addition of left heart catheterization (LHC) to exercise protocols allows for a unique focus on parameters of systolic and diastolic responses to increased activity in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive adult patients who underwent LHC with exercise for any indication from June 2017 to June 2023. For all patients, the relationship between exercise and parameters of LV systolic and diastolic response was assessed. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the indication for testing: hemodynamic optimization (Optim, n = 5) or weaning consideration (Wean, n = 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients (88% male, median age 57 years (IQR 44, 65)) were included. LVEF was 45% (IQR 45, 56) in Wean and 25% (IQR 20, 42) in Optim. LV systolic work index (LVSWI) increased more rapidly over levels of exercise in Wean vs. Optim (slope 46.3 vs. -0.625; p = 0.044) and LVSWI rose more quickly at lower levels of LV end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in Wean vs. Optim (slope 219.5 vs. -2.008; p = 0.0026). Pulse power index was higher in Wean patients at baseline (0.046 (IQR 0.04, 0.07) vs. 0.016 (IQR 0.001, 0.04); p = 0.14) and peak exercise (0.12 (IQR 0.12, 0.12) vs. 0.06 (IQR 0.03, 0.1); p = 0.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with favorable remodeling on LVAD support have significantly improved LV systolic and diastolic responses to exercise and a trend of higher systemic pulsatility. Improving our understanding of LV-LVAD interactions with activity may aid in future efforts to improve exercise tolerance through speed modulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Left-Sided Hemodynamics With Exercise in Patients With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.\",\"authors\":\"Sara S Inglis, Sarah D Schettle, Mauricio A Villavicencio, Philip J Spencer, John M Stulak, Paul C Tang, Sudhir S Kushwaha, Atta Behfar, Andrew N Rosenbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aor.14995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addition of left heart catheterization (LHC) to exercise protocols allows for a unique focus on parameters of systolic and diastolic responses to increased activity in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive adult patients who underwent LHC with exercise for any indication from June 2017 to June 2023. For all patients, the relationship between exercise and parameters of LV systolic and diastolic response was assessed. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the indication for testing: hemodynamic optimization (Optim, n = 5) or weaning consideration (Wean, n = 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients (88% male, median age 57 years (IQR 44, 65)) were included. LVEF was 45% (IQR 45, 56) in Wean and 25% (IQR 20, 42) in Optim. LV systolic work index (LVSWI) increased more rapidly over levels of exercise in Wean vs. Optim (slope 46.3 vs. -0.625; p = 0.044) and LVSWI rose more quickly at lower levels of LV end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in Wean vs. Optim (slope 219.5 vs. -2.008; p = 0.0026). Pulse power index was higher in Wean patients at baseline (0.046 (IQR 0.04, 0.07) vs. 0.016 (IQR 0.001, 0.04); p = 0.14) and peak exercise (0.12 (IQR 0.12, 0.12) vs. 0.06 (IQR 0.03, 0.1); p = 0.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with favorable remodeling on LVAD support have significantly improved LV systolic and diastolic responses to exercise and a trend of higher systemic pulsatility. Improving our understanding of LV-LVAD interactions with activity may aid in future efforts to improve exercise tolerance through speed modulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial organs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14995\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14995","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在运动方案中加入左心导管(LHC),可以独特地关注在左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持下患者活动增加时的收缩和舒张反应参数。方法:回顾性分析2017年6月至2023年6月期间所有连续接受LHC伴运动适应症的成年患者。对于所有患者,评估运动与左室收缩和舒张反应参数之间的关系。根据检测适应症将患者分为两组:血流动力学优化(Optim, n = 5)或考虑断奶(断奶,n = 3)。结果:纳入8例患者(88%为男性,中位年龄57岁(IQR 44,65))。LVEF在断奶组为45% (IQR 45, 56),在Optim组为25% (IQR 20, 42)。与Optim相比,断奶组左室收缩功指数(LVSWI)随运动水平的增加更快(斜率46.3 vs -0.625;p = 0.044)和LVSWI在较低的左室舒张压(LVEDP)水平下上升得更快(斜率219.5 vs. -2.008;p = 0.0026)。断奶期患者基线时脉搏功率指数较高(0.046 (IQR = 0.04, 0.07) vs. 0.016 (IQR = 0.001, 0.04);p = 0.14)和峰值运动(0.12 (IQR 0.12, 0.12) vs. 0.06 (IQR 0.03, 0.1);p = 0.29)。结论:在LVAD支持下重构良好的患者在运动后左室收缩和舒张反应明显改善,并有更高的全身脉搏的趋势。提高我们对lvad与活动相互作用的理解可能有助于未来通过速度调节提高运动耐受性的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Left-Sided Hemodynamics With Exercise in Patients With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

Background: Addition of left heart catheterization (LHC) to exercise protocols allows for a unique focus on parameters of systolic and diastolic responses to increased activity in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive adult patients who underwent LHC with exercise for any indication from June 2017 to June 2023. For all patients, the relationship between exercise and parameters of LV systolic and diastolic response was assessed. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the indication for testing: hemodynamic optimization (Optim, n = 5) or weaning consideration (Wean, n = 3).

Results: Eight patients (88% male, median age 57 years (IQR 44, 65)) were included. LVEF was 45% (IQR 45, 56) in Wean and 25% (IQR 20, 42) in Optim. LV systolic work index (LVSWI) increased more rapidly over levels of exercise in Wean vs. Optim (slope 46.3 vs. -0.625; p = 0.044) and LVSWI rose more quickly at lower levels of LV end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in Wean vs. Optim (slope 219.5 vs. -2.008; p = 0.0026). Pulse power index was higher in Wean patients at baseline (0.046 (IQR 0.04, 0.07) vs. 0.016 (IQR 0.001, 0.04); p = 0.14) and peak exercise (0.12 (IQR 0.12, 0.12) vs. 0.06 (IQR 0.03, 0.1); p = 0.29).

Conclusions: Patients with favorable remodeling on LVAD support have significantly improved LV systolic and diastolic responses to exercise and a trend of higher systemic pulsatility. Improving our understanding of LV-LVAD interactions with activity may aid in future efforts to improve exercise tolerance through speed modulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信