基于深度学习的骨质疏松筛查全景x线片评价:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ali Tarighatnia, Masoud Amanzadeh, Mahnaz Hamedan, Alireza Mohammadnia, Nader D Nader
{"title":"基于深度学习的骨质疏松筛查全景x线片评价:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ali Tarighatnia, Masoud Amanzadeh, Mahnaz Hamedan, Alireza Mohammadnia, Nader D Nader","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01626-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporosis is a complex condition that drives research into its causes, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, significantly affecting patients and healthcare providers in various aspects of life. Research is exploring orthopantomogram (OPG) radiography for osteoporosis screening instead of bone mineral density (BMD) assessments. Although this method uses various indicators, manual analysis can be challenging. Machine learning and deep learning techniques have been developed to address this. This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to evaluate the accuracy of deep learning models in predicting osteoporosis from OPG radiographs, providing evidence for their performance and clinical use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science up to February 10, 2025, using the keywords related to deep learning, osteoporosis, and panoramic radiography. We conducted title, abstract, and full-text screening based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate random-effects model to pool diagnostic accuracy measures, and subgroup analyses explored sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 204 articles, removed 189 duplicates and irrelevant studies, assessed 15articles, and ultimately, seven studies were selected. The DL models showed AUC values of 66.8-99.8%, with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 59 to 97% and 64.9-100%, respectively. No significant differences in diagnostic accuracy were found among subgroups. AlexNet had the highest performance, achieving a sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 0.99. Sensitivity analysis revealed that excluding outliers had little impact on the results. Deeks' funnel plot indicated no significant publication bias (P = 0.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review indicates that deep learning models for osteoporosis diagnosis achieved 80% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 93% AUC. Models like AlexNet and ResNet demonstrate effectiveness. These findings suggest that DL models are promising for noninvasive early detection, but more extensive multicenter studies are necessary to validate their efficacy in at-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based evaluation of panoramic radiographs for osteoporosis screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Tarighatnia, Masoud Amanzadeh, Mahnaz Hamedan, Alireza Mohammadnia, Nader D Nader\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12880-025-01626-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporosis is a complex condition that drives research into its causes, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, significantly affecting patients and healthcare providers in various aspects of life. Research is exploring orthopantomogram (OPG) radiography for osteoporosis screening instead of bone mineral density (BMD) assessments. Although this method uses various indicators, manual analysis can be challenging. Machine learning and deep learning techniques have been developed to address this. This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to evaluate the accuracy of deep learning models in predicting osteoporosis from OPG radiographs, providing evidence for their performance and clinical use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science up to February 10, 2025, using the keywords related to deep learning, osteoporosis, and panoramic radiography. We conducted title, abstract, and full-text screening based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate random-effects model to pool diagnostic accuracy measures, and subgroup analyses explored sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 204 articles, removed 189 duplicates and irrelevant studies, assessed 15articles, and ultimately, seven studies were selected. The DL models showed AUC values of 66.8-99.8%, with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 59 to 97% and 64.9-100%, respectively. No significant differences in diagnostic accuracy were found among subgroups. AlexNet had the highest performance, achieving a sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 0.99. Sensitivity analysis revealed that excluding outliers had little impact on the results. Deeks' funnel plot indicated no significant publication bias (P = 0.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review indicates that deep learning models for osteoporosis diagnosis achieved 80% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 93% AUC. Models like AlexNet and ResNet demonstrate effectiveness. These findings suggest that DL models are promising for noninvasive early detection, but more extensive multicenter studies are necessary to validate their efficacy in at-risk groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905531/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01626-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01626-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨质疏松症是一种复杂的疾病,对其病因、诊断、治疗和预防的研究不断深入,在生活的各个方面显著影响着患者和医疗保健提供者。研究正在探索用骨断层摄影(OPG)代替骨矿物质密度(BMD)评估骨质疏松症筛查。尽管该方法使用了各种指标,但手工分析可能具有挑战性。机器学习和深度学习技术已经被开发出来解决这个问题。该系统综述和荟萃分析首次评估了深度学习模型预测OPG x线片骨质疏松症的准确性,为其性能和临床应用提供了证据。方法:在MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science中检索到2025年2月10日的相关文献,检索关键词为深度学习、骨质疏松症、全景放射学。我们根据纳入/排除标准进行了标题、摘要和全文筛选。采用双变量随机效应模型进行meta分析,汇总诊断准确性指标,并进行亚组分析,探索异质性的来源。结果:我们发现了204篇文章,删除了189篇重复和不相关的研究,评估了15篇文章,最终选择了7篇研究。DL模型的AUC值为66.8 ~ 99.8%,敏感性为59 ~ 97%,特异性为64.9 ~ 100%。亚组间诊断准确性无显著差异。AlexNet表现最好,灵敏度为0.89,特异性为0.99。敏感性分析显示,排除异常值对结果影响不大。Deeks漏斗图显示无显著发表偏倚(P = 0.54)。结论:本系统综述表明,骨质疏松症诊断的深度学习模型灵敏度为80%,特异性为92%,AUC为93%。AlexNet和ResNet等模型证明了其有效性。这些发现表明DL模型有望用于无创早期检测,但需要更广泛的多中心研究来验证其在高危人群中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep learning-based evaluation of panoramic radiographs for osteoporosis screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Osteoporosis is a complex condition that drives research into its causes, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, significantly affecting patients and healthcare providers in various aspects of life. Research is exploring orthopantomogram (OPG) radiography for osteoporosis screening instead of bone mineral density (BMD) assessments. Although this method uses various indicators, manual analysis can be challenging. Machine learning and deep learning techniques have been developed to address this. This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to evaluate the accuracy of deep learning models in predicting osteoporosis from OPG radiographs, providing evidence for their performance and clinical use.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science up to February 10, 2025, using the keywords related to deep learning, osteoporosis, and panoramic radiography. We conducted title, abstract, and full-text screening based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate random-effects model to pool diagnostic accuracy measures, and subgroup analyses explored sources of heterogeneity.

Results: We found 204 articles, removed 189 duplicates and irrelevant studies, assessed 15articles, and ultimately, seven studies were selected. The DL models showed AUC values of 66.8-99.8%, with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 59 to 97% and 64.9-100%, respectively. No significant differences in diagnostic accuracy were found among subgroups. AlexNet had the highest performance, achieving a sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 0.99. Sensitivity analysis revealed that excluding outliers had little impact on the results. Deeks' funnel plot indicated no significant publication bias (P = 0.54).

Conclusions: This systematic review indicates that deep learning models for osteoporosis diagnosis achieved 80% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 93% AUC. Models like AlexNet and ResNet demonstrate effectiveness. These findings suggest that DL models are promising for noninvasive early detection, but more extensive multicenter studies are necessary to validate their efficacy in at-risk groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信