中国陆生哺乳动物生态专家的分布与保护

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ling-Ying Shuai, Yanina Benedetti, Federico Morelli, Zhu-Cheng Gao, Yu-Xin Luo, Yue Luo, Hao Zhu, Zhi-Tao Liu, Wei Liu
{"title":"中国陆生哺乳动物生态专家的分布与保护","authors":"Ling-Ying Shuai,&nbsp;Yanina Benedetti,&nbsp;Federico Morelli,&nbsp;Zhu-Cheng Gao,&nbsp;Yu-Xin Luo,&nbsp;Yue Luo,&nbsp;Hao Zhu,&nbsp;Zhi-Tao Liu,&nbsp;Wei Liu","doi":"10.1111/jbi.15093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Specialist species are characterised as species with a narrow niche and, thus, vulnerable to environmental changes and disturbance. Understanding the distribution of specialists is important for developing proactive conservation strategies. Although China is among the countries with the highest diversity of mammals, no previous studies have explored the distribution and conservation status of specialists in Chinese mammals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Present day.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Chinese terrestrial mammals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We assessed the distribution of three types of specialisation in Chinese terrestrial mammals: diet specialist, habitat specialist and extreme specialist (i.e., species that are both diet and habitat specialist). We adopted generalised linear models to test whether some landscape-level factors explain the variation of each type of specialisation richness. Gap analyses were conducted to assess the conservation status of the specialists identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From a total of 621 mammal species, 327 species were identified as specialists, including 237, 137 and 48 species categorised as diet specialists, habitat specialists and extreme specialists respectively. The mountains in southwest China have the highest diversity of specialised terrestrial mammals in China, regardless of the type of specialisation. After controlling for the effect of overall species richness, other hotspots held more specialist species than expected from the overall species richness (e.g., the Qinghai-Tibet plateau, the Junggar Basin, Liaoning and Guangdong). High-altitude areas tended to possess more diet and habitat specialist species. Elevation range and habitat diversity were positively related to diet specialist richness but negatively related to habitat specialist richness. Only 42 (12.84%) of the 327 specialist species were adequately covered by the current protected areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We have identified multiple hotspots of ecological specialisation in terrestrial mammals in China. The role of landscape factors in shaping specialist richness was inconsistent among different types of specialisation. We also found a serious spatial mismatch between specialisation and current conservation efforts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biogeography","volume":"52 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distribution and Protection of Ecological Specialists in Chinese Terrestrial Mammals\",\"authors\":\"Ling-Ying Shuai,&nbsp;Yanina Benedetti,&nbsp;Federico Morelli,&nbsp;Zhu-Cheng Gao,&nbsp;Yu-Xin Luo,&nbsp;Yue Luo,&nbsp;Hao Zhu,&nbsp;Zhi-Tao Liu,&nbsp;Wei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbi.15093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Specialist species are characterised as species with a narrow niche and, thus, vulnerable to environmental changes and disturbance. Understanding the distribution of specialists is important for developing proactive conservation strategies. Although China is among the countries with the highest diversity of mammals, no previous studies have explored the distribution and conservation status of specialists in Chinese mammals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>China.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>Present day.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Chinese terrestrial mammals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We assessed the distribution of three types of specialisation in Chinese terrestrial mammals: diet specialist, habitat specialist and extreme specialist (i.e., species that are both diet and habitat specialist). We adopted generalised linear models to test whether some landscape-level factors explain the variation of each type of specialisation richness. Gap analyses were conducted to assess the conservation status of the specialists identified.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>From a total of 621 mammal species, 327 species were identified as specialists, including 237, 137 and 48 species categorised as diet specialists, habitat specialists and extreme specialists respectively. The mountains in southwest China have the highest diversity of specialised terrestrial mammals in China, regardless of the type of specialisation. After controlling for the effect of overall species richness, other hotspots held more specialist species than expected from the overall species richness (e.g., the Qinghai-Tibet plateau, the Junggar Basin, Liaoning and Guangdong). High-altitude areas tended to possess more diet and habitat specialist species. Elevation range and habitat diversity were positively related to diet specialist richness but negatively related to habitat specialist richness. Only 42 (12.84%) of the 327 specialist species were adequately covered by the current protected areas.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We have identified multiple hotspots of ecological specialisation in terrestrial mammals in China. The role of landscape factors in shaping specialist richness was inconsistent among different types of specialisation. We also found a serious spatial mismatch between specialisation and current conservation efforts.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15093\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特殊物种的特点是物种具有狭窄的生态位,因此容易受到环境变化和干扰。了解专家的分布对于制定积极的保护策略非常重要。虽然中国是哺乳动物多样性最高的国家之一,但尚未有研究探讨中国哺乳动物的分布和保护状况。位置 中国。时间:现在。分类群研究中国陆生哺乳动物。方法对中国陆生哺乳动物的饮食专家、栖息地专家和极端专家(即饮食专家和栖息地专家)三种专业化类型的分布进行了评估。我们采用广义线性模型来检验景观层面因子是否解释了各类型专业化丰富度的变化。进行了差距分析,以评估所确定的专家的保护状况。结果在621种哺乳动物中,鉴定出专科动物327种,其中饮食专科动物237种,生境专科动物137种,极端专科动物48种。中国西南山区的特化陆生哺乳动物多样性最高,无论特化类型如何。在控制了总体物种丰富度的影响后,其他热点地区(如青藏高原、准噶尔盆地、辽宁和广东)的专科物种数量高于总体物种丰富度的预期。高海拔地区往往拥有更多的饮食和栖息地专用物种。海拔高度和生境多样性与饮食专家丰富度正相关,与生境专家丰富度负相关。在327种特殊物种中,只有42种(12.84%)被现有保护区充分覆盖。我们发现了中国陆生哺乳动物生态专门化的多个热点。景观因子对专家丰富度形成的作用在不同类型的专业化中不一致。我们还发现专业化与当前的保护努力之间存在严重的空间不匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distribution and Protection of Ecological Specialists in Chinese Terrestrial Mammals

Aim

Specialist species are characterised as species with a narrow niche and, thus, vulnerable to environmental changes and disturbance. Understanding the distribution of specialists is important for developing proactive conservation strategies. Although China is among the countries with the highest diversity of mammals, no previous studies have explored the distribution and conservation status of specialists in Chinese mammals.

Location

China.

Time Period

Present day.

Taxa Studied

Chinese terrestrial mammals.

Methods

We assessed the distribution of three types of specialisation in Chinese terrestrial mammals: diet specialist, habitat specialist and extreme specialist (i.e., species that are both diet and habitat specialist). We adopted generalised linear models to test whether some landscape-level factors explain the variation of each type of specialisation richness. Gap analyses were conducted to assess the conservation status of the specialists identified.

Results

From a total of 621 mammal species, 327 species were identified as specialists, including 237, 137 and 48 species categorised as diet specialists, habitat specialists and extreme specialists respectively. The mountains in southwest China have the highest diversity of specialised terrestrial mammals in China, regardless of the type of specialisation. After controlling for the effect of overall species richness, other hotspots held more specialist species than expected from the overall species richness (e.g., the Qinghai-Tibet plateau, the Junggar Basin, Liaoning and Guangdong). High-altitude areas tended to possess more diet and habitat specialist species. Elevation range and habitat diversity were positively related to diet specialist richness but negatively related to habitat specialist richness. Only 42 (12.84%) of the 327 specialist species were adequately covered by the current protected areas.

Main Conclusions

We have identified multiple hotspots of ecological specialisation in terrestrial mammals in China. The role of landscape factors in shaping specialist richness was inconsistent among different types of specialisation. We also found a serious spatial mismatch between specialisation and current conservation efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biogeography
Journal of Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Papers dealing with all aspects of spatial, ecological and historical biogeography are considered for publication in Journal of Biogeography. The mission of the journal is to contribute to the growth and societal relevance of the discipline of biogeography through its role in the dissemination of biogeographical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信