森林净初级生产分配的全球格局

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Xiancheng Lu, Chi-Hsin Chung, Yadvinder Malhi, Cho-ying Huang
{"title":"森林净初级生产分配的全球格局","authors":"Xiancheng Lu,&nbsp;Chi-Hsin Chung,&nbsp;Yadvinder Malhi,&nbsp;Cho-ying Huang","doi":"10.1111/jbi.15094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Environmental factors that govern the allocation of net primary production (NPP) between long-lived components (wood) and short-lived components (leaves, fine roots) are poorly understood yet essential when relating NPP to carbon stocks, especially among different plant functional types. We conducted a spatially synoptic analysis to investigate the relationships between NPP allocation and climate at the global scale. We ask a fundamental question in forest ecology and terrestrial carbon science: What environmental drivers influence NPP allocation?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global forests (64.21 N–41.53 S).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Taxon</h3>\n \n <p>Trees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We investigated the relationships between field forest NPP data (<i>n</i> = 131) and 31 bioclimatic, meteorological, geographical, topographic and vegetation variables using machine learning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>These environmental variables accounted for 94%, 93% and 85% of the variation in canopy, woody and fine-root NPP fractions, respectively. Most of the important predictors were temperature-related. Allocation to the canopy was facilitated by warm and stable climates. In contrast, woody and fine-root carbon growth could endure cold and extreme temperatures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our analysis suggested that the most important drivers were annual mean (e.g. high canopy and fine-root NPP ratios in favourable climates), variation and extreme (e.g. significant woody and fine-root NPP ratios where light- and nutrient-limited) of temperatures. Overall, most carbon was stored in woody tissue and in a constant proportion to the canopy, which could be explained by allometric scaling and resource availability. Our results pointed to a ‘root-wood’ trade-off rather than the previously prevailing ‘root-leaf’ trade-off, but may vary regionally. For example, regarding particular plant functional types, ‘wood-leaf’ and ‘root-leaf’ were only evident in broadleaved and coniferous forests, respectively, to adapt to climates and compete for resources. Knowing the relationships between NPP allocation and the environment, we could assess forest carbon cycle dynamics in the face of climate change.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biogeography","volume":"52 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Patterns in the Allocation of Forest Net Primary Production\",\"authors\":\"Xiancheng Lu,&nbsp;Chi-Hsin Chung,&nbsp;Yadvinder Malhi,&nbsp;Cho-ying Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbi.15094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Environmental factors that govern the allocation of net primary production (NPP) between long-lived components (wood) and short-lived components (leaves, fine roots) are poorly understood yet essential when relating NPP to carbon stocks, especially among different plant functional types. We conducted a spatially synoptic analysis to investigate the relationships between NPP allocation and climate at the global scale. We ask a fundamental question in forest ecology and terrestrial carbon science: What environmental drivers influence NPP allocation?</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Global forests (64.21 N–41.53 S).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Taxon</h3>\\n \\n <p>Trees.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We investigated the relationships between field forest NPP data (<i>n</i> = 131) and 31 bioclimatic, meteorological, geographical, topographic and vegetation variables using machine learning.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>These environmental variables accounted for 94%, 93% and 85% of the variation in canopy, woody and fine-root NPP fractions, respectively. Most of the important predictors were temperature-related. Allocation to the canopy was facilitated by warm and stable climates. In contrast, woody and fine-root carbon growth could endure cold and extreme temperatures.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our analysis suggested that the most important drivers were annual mean (e.g. high canopy and fine-root NPP ratios in favourable climates), variation and extreme (e.g. significant woody and fine-root NPP ratios where light- and nutrient-limited) of temperatures. Overall, most carbon was stored in woody tissue and in a constant proportion to the canopy, which could be explained by allometric scaling and resource availability. Our results pointed to a ‘root-wood’ trade-off rather than the previously prevailing ‘root-leaf’ trade-off, but may vary regionally. For example, regarding particular plant functional types, ‘wood-leaf’ and ‘root-leaf’ were only evident in broadleaved and coniferous forests, respectively, to adapt to climates and compete for resources. Knowing the relationships between NPP allocation and the environment, we could assess forest carbon cycle dynamics in the face of climate change.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15094\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

控制净初级生产量(NPP)在长寿命组分(木材)和短寿命组分(叶片、细根)之间分配的环境因素知之甚少,但在将NPP与碳储量联系起来时却至关重要,特别是在不同植物功能类型之间。在全球尺度上对NPP分配与气候的关系进行了空间天气分析。我们提出了森林生态学和陆地碳科学的一个基本问题:什么环境驱动因素影响NPP分配?全球森林(64.21 N-41.53 S)。分类单元 树。方法利用机器学习方法研究了131个野外森林NPP数据与31个生物气候、气象、地理、地形和植被变量之间的关系。结果这些环境变量分别占林冠、木本和细根NPP组分变化的94%、93%和85%。大多数重要的预测因素都与温度有关。温暖稳定的气候有利于林冠的分配。相比之下,木质和细根的碳生长可以忍受寒冷和极端温度。分析表明,最重要的驱动因素是年平均温度(如有利气候条件下冠层和细根NPP比较高)、变化和极端温度(如光照和养分限制条件下木本和细根NPP比显著)。总体而言,大部分碳储存在木质组织中,与冠层的比例恒定,这可以通过异速结垢和资源可利用性来解释。我们的研究结果指出了“根-木”的权衡,而不是以前流行的“根-叶”的权衡,但可能因地区而异。例如,关于特定的植物功能类型,“木叶”和“根叶”仅分别在阔叶林和针叶林中明显,以适应气候和竞争资源。了解NPP分配与环境的关系,可以评估气候变化下森林碳循环动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Patterns in the Allocation of Forest Net Primary Production

Aim

Environmental factors that govern the allocation of net primary production (NPP) between long-lived components (wood) and short-lived components (leaves, fine roots) are poorly understood yet essential when relating NPP to carbon stocks, especially among different plant functional types. We conducted a spatially synoptic analysis to investigate the relationships between NPP allocation and climate at the global scale. We ask a fundamental question in forest ecology and terrestrial carbon science: What environmental drivers influence NPP allocation?

Location

Global forests (64.21 N–41.53 S).

Taxon

Trees.

Methods

We investigated the relationships between field forest NPP data (n = 131) and 31 bioclimatic, meteorological, geographical, topographic and vegetation variables using machine learning.

Results

These environmental variables accounted for 94%, 93% and 85% of the variation in canopy, woody and fine-root NPP fractions, respectively. Most of the important predictors were temperature-related. Allocation to the canopy was facilitated by warm and stable climates. In contrast, woody and fine-root carbon growth could endure cold and extreme temperatures.

Main Conclusions

Our analysis suggested that the most important drivers were annual mean (e.g. high canopy and fine-root NPP ratios in favourable climates), variation and extreme (e.g. significant woody and fine-root NPP ratios where light- and nutrient-limited) of temperatures. Overall, most carbon was stored in woody tissue and in a constant proportion to the canopy, which could be explained by allometric scaling and resource availability. Our results pointed to a ‘root-wood’ trade-off rather than the previously prevailing ‘root-leaf’ trade-off, but may vary regionally. For example, regarding particular plant functional types, ‘wood-leaf’ and ‘root-leaf’ were only evident in broadleaved and coniferous forests, respectively, to adapt to climates and compete for resources. Knowing the relationships between NPP allocation and the environment, we could assess forest carbon cycle dynamics in the face of climate change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biogeography
Journal of Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Papers dealing with all aspects of spatial, ecological and historical biogeography are considered for publication in Journal of Biogeography. The mission of the journal is to contribute to the growth and societal relevance of the discipline of biogeography through its role in the dissemination of biogeographical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信