植物修复在废水处理中的有效性:以津巴布韦Karoi供水站为例

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
M. M. Matsa, T. Dube, O. Mupepi
{"title":"植物修复在废水处理中的有效性:以津巴布韦Karoi供水站为例","authors":"M. M. Matsa,&nbsp;T. Dube,&nbsp;O. Mupepi","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-06107-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urbanization is elevating water pollution issues in urban surface water sources which makes it a need to develop and adopt cheap nature based pollution control and management strategies. The research assessed the effectiveness of <i>Salvinia molesta, Duckweed</i> and <i>Azolla filiculoides</i> plant species in waste water phytoremediation at Karoi Water Supply Station in Zimbabwe. An experimental research design was adopted in this study. Laboratory tests were conducted to interpret and analyse changes in water parameters over a 15-day experimental period. Results indicated that <i>Duckweed</i> absorbed nitrates at a faster rate (64%) compared to <i>A. filiculoids</i> (57%) and <i>S. molesta</i> (63%) plant species. <i>Azolla filiculoids</i> absorbed nitrates at a rate significantly slower than both <i>Duckweed</i> and <i>S. molesta</i> as signified by 7% and 6% difference respectively. In terms of phosphates absorption, <i>A. filiculoids</i> indicated to be the fastest absorber with an absorption rate of 62% followed by <i>S. molesta</i> (52%) and <i>Duckweed</i> (45%). The different margins in rates of these plant species in absorption of phosphates was larger than that experienced in nitrates absorption as highlighted by 10% difference between <i>Azolla</i> and <i>Salvinia</i> and 12% between <i>A. filiculoids</i> and <i>Duckweed</i>. <i>Duckweed</i> was the fastest absorber of nitrates but the slowest absorber of phosphates whereas <i>A. filiculoids</i> was the fastest absorber of phosphates but the slowest absorber of nitrates. It was also confirmed that <i>S. molesta</i> requires a longer period of time to reduce water alkalinity compared to <i>A. filiculoides</i> and <i>Duckweed</i>. Over a 15-day time period <i>S. molesta and Duckweed</i> reduced the pH from 10.93 to 8 and 10.93 to 8.8 respectively whilst <i>A. filiculoids</i> reduced it from 10.93 to 8.9, an indication of more effectiveness of <i>Duckweed and S. molesta</i> in reducing alkalinity over a 15-day time period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"22 8","pages":"7013 - 7024"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of phytoremediation in waste-water treatment: a case of Karoi water supply station, Zimbabwe\",\"authors\":\"M. M. Matsa,&nbsp;T. Dube,&nbsp;O. Mupepi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13762-024-06107-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Urbanization is elevating water pollution issues in urban surface water sources which makes it a need to develop and adopt cheap nature based pollution control and management strategies. The research assessed the effectiveness of <i>Salvinia molesta, Duckweed</i> and <i>Azolla filiculoides</i> plant species in waste water phytoremediation at Karoi Water Supply Station in Zimbabwe. An experimental research design was adopted in this study. Laboratory tests were conducted to interpret and analyse changes in water parameters over a 15-day experimental period. Results indicated that <i>Duckweed</i> absorbed nitrates at a faster rate (64%) compared to <i>A. filiculoids</i> (57%) and <i>S. molesta</i> (63%) plant species. <i>Azolla filiculoids</i> absorbed nitrates at a rate significantly slower than both <i>Duckweed</i> and <i>S. molesta</i> as signified by 7% and 6% difference respectively. In terms of phosphates absorption, <i>A. filiculoids</i> indicated to be the fastest absorber with an absorption rate of 62% followed by <i>S. molesta</i> (52%) and <i>Duckweed</i> (45%). The different margins in rates of these plant species in absorption of phosphates was larger than that experienced in nitrates absorption as highlighted by 10% difference between <i>Azolla</i> and <i>Salvinia</i> and 12% between <i>A. filiculoids</i> and <i>Duckweed</i>. <i>Duckweed</i> was the fastest absorber of nitrates but the slowest absorber of phosphates whereas <i>A. filiculoids</i> was the fastest absorber of phosphates but the slowest absorber of nitrates. It was also confirmed that <i>S. molesta</i> requires a longer period of time to reduce water alkalinity compared to <i>A. filiculoides</i> and <i>Duckweed</i>. Over a 15-day time period <i>S. molesta and Duckweed</i> reduced the pH from 10.93 to 8 and 10.93 to 8.8 respectively whilst <i>A. filiculoids</i> reduced it from 10.93 to 8.9, an indication of more effectiveness of <i>Duckweed and S. molesta</i> in reducing alkalinity over a 15-day time period.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"22 8\",\"pages\":\"7013 - 7024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-024-06107-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-024-06107-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市化正在加剧城市地表水水源的水污染问题,因此需要制定和采用以自然为基础的廉价污染控制和管理战略。本研究对津巴布韦Karoi供水站废水植物修复中萨尔维纳、浮萍和杜鹃的效果进行了评价。本研究采用实验研究设计。在为期15天的实验期间,进行了实验室测试,以解释和分析水参数的变化。结果表明,浮萍对硝酸盐的吸收率为64%,高于黄花蒿(57%)和沙菖蒲(63%)。杜鹃花吸收硝酸盐的速度显著低于浮萍和海苔,差异分别为7%和6%。在对磷酸盐的吸收方面,丝线草对磷酸盐的吸收速度最快,为62%,其次是草(52%)和浮萍(45%)。这些植物对磷酸盐吸收速率的差异大于对硝酸盐吸收速率的差异,杜鹃花和沙文花的差异为10%,杜鹃和浮萍的差异为12%。浮萍对硝酸盐的吸收速度最快,对磷酸盐的吸收速度最慢,而A. filiculoids对磷酸盐的吸收速度最快,对硝酸盐的吸收速度最慢。研究还证实,与黄针菇和浮萍相比,毛藻需要更长的时间来降低水的碱度。在15 d的时间内,浮萍和浮萍分别将pH值从10.93降低到8和10.93降低到8.8,而黄花菜则将pH值从10.93降低到8.9,表明浮萍和浮萍在15 d的时间内降低碱度的效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of phytoremediation in waste-water treatment: a case of Karoi water supply station, Zimbabwe

Urbanization is elevating water pollution issues in urban surface water sources which makes it a need to develop and adopt cheap nature based pollution control and management strategies. The research assessed the effectiveness of Salvinia molesta, Duckweed and Azolla filiculoides plant species in waste water phytoremediation at Karoi Water Supply Station in Zimbabwe. An experimental research design was adopted in this study. Laboratory tests were conducted to interpret and analyse changes in water parameters over a 15-day experimental period. Results indicated that Duckweed absorbed nitrates at a faster rate (64%) compared to A. filiculoids (57%) and S. molesta (63%) plant species. Azolla filiculoids absorbed nitrates at a rate significantly slower than both Duckweed and S. molesta as signified by 7% and 6% difference respectively. In terms of phosphates absorption, A. filiculoids indicated to be the fastest absorber with an absorption rate of 62% followed by S. molesta (52%) and Duckweed (45%). The different margins in rates of these plant species in absorption of phosphates was larger than that experienced in nitrates absorption as highlighted by 10% difference between Azolla and Salvinia and 12% between A. filiculoids and Duckweed. Duckweed was the fastest absorber of nitrates but the slowest absorber of phosphates whereas A. filiculoids was the fastest absorber of phosphates but the slowest absorber of nitrates. It was also confirmed that S. molesta requires a longer period of time to reduce water alkalinity compared to A. filiculoides and Duckweed. Over a 15-day time period S. molesta and Duckweed reduced the pH from 10.93 to 8 and 10.93 to 8.8 respectively whilst A. filiculoids reduced it from 10.93 to 8.9, an indication of more effectiveness of Duckweed and S. molesta in reducing alkalinity over a 15-day time period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
806
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made. The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信