检测阿片类药物效应阈值的个体间差异:可测试行为表型的受试者内部人类实验室证据

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Greer McKendrick , Caitlyn J. Durgin , Andrew S. Huhn , Cecilia L. Bergeria , Patrick H. Finan , Denis Antoine , Kelly E. Dunn
{"title":"检测阿片类药物效应阈值的个体间差异:可测试行为表型的受试者内部人类实验室证据","authors":"Greer McKendrick ,&nbsp;Caitlyn J. Durgin ,&nbsp;Andrew S. Huhn ,&nbsp;Cecilia L. Bergeria ,&nbsp;Patrick H. Finan ,&nbsp;Denis Antoine ,&nbsp;Kelly E. Dunn","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Variations in inter-individual response to opioid medications has not been well-investigated in prospective, empirical designs or in persons who have no learned experience with opioids or current pain conditions. These analyses categorized response to opioids during rigorous human laboratory experimental conditions. Healthy individuals (N = 75) with little to no prior opioid exposure completed a 5-day residential study wherein they received triple-blinded doses of placebo or oral hydromorphone (2<!--> <!-->mg, 4<!--> <!-->mg, 8<!--> <!-->mg). Outcomes included a series of general and specific visual analog scale (VAS) ratings completed by participants and blinded observers, physiological endpoints, and analgesic responses to laboratory-evoked pain. The lowest dose at which participants endorsed &gt; 20 point change in self-reported “Drug Effect” VAS ratings from baseline was used to define the following opioid sensitivity thresholds: 2<!--> <!-->mg (“Low Threshold”, N = 9), 4<!--> <!-->mg (“Medium”; N = 29), and 8<!--> <!-->mg (“High”, N = 14); a “No Threshold” group (N = 31) did not endorse any effects at any dose. Main effects of sensitivity threshold existed for most participant-reported responses and conformed to threshold categories in dose-dependent ways. In contrast, no main effects of sensitivity threshold were observed for blinded observer ratings, physiological endpoints, or evoked analgesic responses, such that hydromorphone produced dose-dependent opioid agonist effects for all participants that diverged from their self-reported experience. These data provide the most granular assessment of inter-individual differences in opioid response among persons with little or no lifetime opioid exposure or existing pain condition. All participants experienced dose-dependent changes in opioid agonist responses, yet their self-awareness of these effects varied and 30 % of participants endorsed no awareness of opioid exposure at any dose. These data demonstrate a consistent and reliable divergence between the subjective experience of opioids from rigorously-assessed physiological, observable, and analgesic responses. Testable implications of these outcomes are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 112644"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-individual divergence in thresholds for detecting opioid effects: Within-subject human laboratory evidence of a testable behavioral phenotype\",\"authors\":\"Greer McKendrick ,&nbsp;Caitlyn J. Durgin ,&nbsp;Andrew S. Huhn ,&nbsp;Cecilia L. Bergeria ,&nbsp;Patrick H. Finan ,&nbsp;Denis Antoine ,&nbsp;Kelly E. Dunn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Variations in inter-individual response to opioid medications has not been well-investigated in prospective, empirical designs or in persons who have no learned experience with opioids or current pain conditions. These analyses categorized response to opioids during rigorous human laboratory experimental conditions. Healthy individuals (N = 75) with little to no prior opioid exposure completed a 5-day residential study wherein they received triple-blinded doses of placebo or oral hydromorphone (2<!--> <!-->mg, 4<!--> <!-->mg, 8<!--> <!-->mg). Outcomes included a series of general and specific visual analog scale (VAS) ratings completed by participants and blinded observers, physiological endpoints, and analgesic responses to laboratory-evoked pain. The lowest dose at which participants endorsed &gt; 20 point change in self-reported “Drug Effect” VAS ratings from baseline was used to define the following opioid sensitivity thresholds: 2<!--> <!-->mg (“Low Threshold”, N = 9), 4<!--> <!-->mg (“Medium”; N = 29), and 8<!--> <!-->mg (“High”, N = 14); a “No Threshold” group (N = 31) did not endorse any effects at any dose. Main effects of sensitivity threshold existed for most participant-reported responses and conformed to threshold categories in dose-dependent ways. In contrast, no main effects of sensitivity threshold were observed for blinded observer ratings, physiological endpoints, or evoked analgesic responses, such that hydromorphone produced dose-dependent opioid agonist effects for all participants that diverged from their self-reported experience. These data provide the most granular assessment of inter-individual differences in opioid response among persons with little or no lifetime opioid exposure or existing pain condition. All participants experienced dose-dependent changes in opioid agonist responses, yet their self-awareness of these effects varied and 30 % of participants endorsed no awareness of opioid exposure at any dose. These data demonstrate a consistent and reliable divergence between the subjective experience of opioids from rigorously-assessed physiological, observable, and analgesic responses. Testable implications of these outcomes are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"volume\":\"271 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625000973\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625000973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个体间对阿片类药物反应的差异尚未在前瞻性、经验性设计或没有阿片类药物学习经验或当前疼痛状况的人群中得到很好的调查。这些分析分类了在严格的人类实验室实验条件下对阿片类药物的反应。先前很少或没有阿片类药物暴露的健康个体(N = 75)完成了一项为期5天的住院研究,其中他们接受了三盲剂量的安慰剂或口服氢吗啡酮(2mg, 4mg, 8mg)。结果包括由参与者和盲法观察者完成的一系列一般和特定视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、生理终点和对实验室诱发疼痛的镇痛反应。受试者自我报告的“药物效应”VAS评分较基线有20点变化时的最低剂量被用来定义以下阿片类药物敏感性阈值:2mg(“低阈值”,N = 9), 4mg(“中等”;N = 29)和8毫克(“高”,N = 14);“无阈值”组(N = 31)不认可任何剂量的任何影响。敏感性阈值的主要影响存在于大多数参与者报告的反应中,并以剂量依赖的方式符合阈值类别。相比之下,没有观察到敏感性阈值对盲法观察者评分、生理终点或诱发镇痛反应的主要影响,因此氢吗啡酮对所有参与者产生剂量依赖性阿片激动剂效应,这与他们自我报告的经验不同。这些数据为很少或没有阿片类药物暴露或存在疼痛状况的人的阿片类药物反应的个体间差异提供了最详细的评估。所有参与者都经历了阿片类激动剂反应的剂量依赖性变化,但他们对这些影响的自我意识各不相同,30%的参与者表示没有意识到任何剂量的阿片类药物暴露。这些数据表明,阿片类药物的主观体验与严格评估的生理、观察和镇痛反应之间存在一致和可靠的差异。讨论了这些结果的可测试含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inter-individual divergence in thresholds for detecting opioid effects: Within-subject human laboratory evidence of a testable behavioral phenotype
Variations in inter-individual response to opioid medications has not been well-investigated in prospective, empirical designs or in persons who have no learned experience with opioids or current pain conditions. These analyses categorized response to opioids during rigorous human laboratory experimental conditions. Healthy individuals (N = 75) with little to no prior opioid exposure completed a 5-day residential study wherein they received triple-blinded doses of placebo or oral hydromorphone (2 mg, 4 mg, 8 mg). Outcomes included a series of general and specific visual analog scale (VAS) ratings completed by participants and blinded observers, physiological endpoints, and analgesic responses to laboratory-evoked pain. The lowest dose at which participants endorsed > 20 point change in self-reported “Drug Effect” VAS ratings from baseline was used to define the following opioid sensitivity thresholds: 2 mg (“Low Threshold”, N = 9), 4 mg (“Medium”; N = 29), and 8 mg (“High”, N = 14); a “No Threshold” group (N = 31) did not endorse any effects at any dose. Main effects of sensitivity threshold existed for most participant-reported responses and conformed to threshold categories in dose-dependent ways. In contrast, no main effects of sensitivity threshold were observed for blinded observer ratings, physiological endpoints, or evoked analgesic responses, such that hydromorphone produced dose-dependent opioid agonist effects for all participants that diverged from their self-reported experience. These data provide the most granular assessment of inter-individual differences in opioid response among persons with little or no lifetime opioid exposure or existing pain condition. All participants experienced dose-dependent changes in opioid agonist responses, yet their self-awareness of these effects varied and 30 % of participants endorsed no awareness of opioid exposure at any dose. These data demonstrate a consistent and reliable divergence between the subjective experience of opioids from rigorously-assessed physiological, observable, and analgesic responses. Testable implications of these outcomes are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信