按道路控制类型和交叉路口类型划分的与眼睛离开道路时间相关的碰撞风险

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Shu Han , Yi Glaser , Charlie Klauer , Gabrial Anderson , Feng Guo
{"title":"按道路控制类型和交叉路口类型划分的与眼睛离开道路时间相关的碰撞风险","authors":"Shu Han ,&nbsp;Yi Glaser ,&nbsp;Charlie Klauer ,&nbsp;Gabrial Anderson ,&nbsp;Feng Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction</em>: Scanning the driving environment is crucial for safe driving. However, the complexity of the driving environment affects a driver’s ability to maintain sufficient situational awareness. This study aimed to quantify the crash risk associated with eye-off-road (EOR) behavior across different road control and intersection types, providing insights for Driver Monitoring Systems (DMSs).<!--> <em>Method:<!--> </em>Using data from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study (SHRP 2 NDS), we analyzed crash risk associated with EOR glance durations within a 6-second window. We compared odds ratios across three EOR duration groups: ≤ 2 s, 2 to 3 s, and 3 to 4 s. Additionally, we used a General Additive Model (GAM) to explore the non-linear relationship between EOR duration and crash risk.<!--> <em>Results:<!--> </em>Our findings reveal that crash risk is higher on uncontrolled access roads compared to controlled access roads. Among intersection types, turning at intersections presents the highest risk, followed by going straight at intersections and driving on straight non-intersection segments. Notably, the crash risk increases linearly only for short EOR durations but rises much faster than linearly when EOR durations exceed specific thresholds: 1.3 s for controlled access roads, 1.2 s for uncontrolled access roads, and as low as 0.9 s for turning at intersections. <em>Conclusions and Practical Applications:</em> These results challenge the commonly used 2-second threshold in driver distraction research, offering more refined insights that could enhance DMS alert settings based on driving environment. This study underscores the importance of considering road and intersection types when assessing the risks of EOR behavior, contributing to improved road safety strategies.<!--> <!-->Note that the study is not intended to specify exact values for DMS timers, which must be determined in practice by considering multiple factors. Additionally, the false alert rate requires further evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 266-273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crash risk associated with eyes-off-road duration by road control type and intersection type\",\"authors\":\"Shu Han ,&nbsp;Yi Glaser ,&nbsp;Charlie Klauer ,&nbsp;Gabrial Anderson ,&nbsp;Feng Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsr.2025.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Introduction</em>: Scanning the driving environment is crucial for safe driving. However, the complexity of the driving environment affects a driver’s ability to maintain sufficient situational awareness. This study aimed to quantify the crash risk associated with eye-off-road (EOR) behavior across different road control and intersection types, providing insights for Driver Monitoring Systems (DMSs).<!--> <em>Method:<!--> </em>Using data from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study (SHRP 2 NDS), we analyzed crash risk associated with EOR glance durations within a 6-second window. We compared odds ratios across three EOR duration groups: ≤ 2 s, 2 to 3 s, and 3 to 4 s. Additionally, we used a General Additive Model (GAM) to explore the non-linear relationship between EOR duration and crash risk.<!--> <em>Results:<!--> </em>Our findings reveal that crash risk is higher on uncontrolled access roads compared to controlled access roads. Among intersection types, turning at intersections presents the highest risk, followed by going straight at intersections and driving on straight non-intersection segments. Notably, the crash risk increases linearly only for short EOR durations but rises much faster than linearly when EOR durations exceed specific thresholds: 1.3 s for controlled access roads, 1.2 s for uncontrolled access roads, and as low as 0.9 s for turning at intersections. <em>Conclusions and Practical Applications:</em> These results challenge the commonly used 2-second threshold in driver distraction research, offering more refined insights that could enhance DMS alert settings based on driving environment. This study underscores the importance of considering road and intersection types when assessing the risks of EOR behavior, contributing to improved road safety strategies.<!--> <!-->Note that the study is not intended to specify exact values for DMS timers, which must be determined in practice by considering multiple factors. Additionally, the false alert rate requires further evaluation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 266-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437525000519\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437525000519","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crash risk associated with eyes-off-road duration by road control type and intersection type
Introduction: Scanning the driving environment is crucial for safe driving. However, the complexity of the driving environment affects a driver’s ability to maintain sufficient situational awareness. This study aimed to quantify the crash risk associated with eye-off-road (EOR) behavior across different road control and intersection types, providing insights for Driver Monitoring Systems (DMSs). Method: Using data from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study (SHRP 2 NDS), we analyzed crash risk associated with EOR glance durations within a 6-second window. We compared odds ratios across three EOR duration groups: ≤ 2 s, 2 to 3 s, and 3 to 4 s. Additionally, we used a General Additive Model (GAM) to explore the non-linear relationship between EOR duration and crash risk. Results: Our findings reveal that crash risk is higher on uncontrolled access roads compared to controlled access roads. Among intersection types, turning at intersections presents the highest risk, followed by going straight at intersections and driving on straight non-intersection segments. Notably, the crash risk increases linearly only for short EOR durations but rises much faster than linearly when EOR durations exceed specific thresholds: 1.3 s for controlled access roads, 1.2 s for uncontrolled access roads, and as low as 0.9 s for turning at intersections. Conclusions and Practical Applications: These results challenge the commonly used 2-second threshold in driver distraction research, offering more refined insights that could enhance DMS alert settings based on driving environment. This study underscores the importance of considering road and intersection types when assessing the risks of EOR behavior, contributing to improved road safety strategies. Note that the study is not intended to specify exact values for DMS timers, which must be determined in practice by considering multiple factors. Additionally, the false alert rate requires further evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信