斯堪的纳维亚神经创伤委员会指南的验证- Örebro县地区的回顾性研究

IF 2.5 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Samuel Jara Josefsson , Dhanisha Trivedi , Patrick Vigren , András Büki
{"title":"斯堪的纳维亚神经创伤委员会指南的验证- Örebro县地区的回顾性研究","authors":"Samuel Jara Josefsson ,&nbsp;Dhanisha Trivedi ,&nbsp;Patrick Vigren ,&nbsp;András Büki","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a global health concern and a leading cause of trauma-related death worldwide. Computed tomography (CT) scan is the gold standard for screening for intracranial bleeding following TBI. Most cases of TBI are mild, with negative CT scans. Different instruments and guidelines are employed to better predict which patients need a CT scan and to minimise unnecessary radiation exposure and save resources. One such instrument is the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>To validate and examine adherence to the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guidelines in Region Örebro County.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We executed a retrospective study with review of patient records and data analysis. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used, along with binary logistic regression analysis to account for confounding factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 505 cases were reviewed. Sensitivity of the guidelines was measured at 95% with specificity at 29%. The positive and negative predictive values were 0.77 and 0.69, respectively. A total of 17 false negative cases were found. One case required surgery, during which a chronic subdural hematoma was identified. Adherence to guidelines was 56%, with the lack of analysis of S100B primarily accounting for non-adherence. A total of 54 CT scans were performed outside of guideline indications.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><div>The guidelines can effectively predict which patients need a CT scan. Increased adherence could potentially decrease the number of CT scans, while inclusion of older age limit as an independent rule-in law for CT scans would increase patient safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 104231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Scandinavian neurotrauma committee guidelines – A retrospective study in region Örebro county\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Jara Josefsson ,&nbsp;Dhanisha Trivedi ,&nbsp;Patrick Vigren ,&nbsp;András Büki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a global health concern and a leading cause of trauma-related death worldwide. Computed tomography (CT) scan is the gold standard for screening for intracranial bleeding following TBI. Most cases of TBI are mild, with negative CT scans. Different instruments and guidelines are employed to better predict which patients need a CT scan and to minimise unnecessary radiation exposure and save resources. One such instrument is the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>To validate and examine adherence to the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guidelines in Region Örebro County.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We executed a retrospective study with review of patient records and data analysis. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used, along with binary logistic regression analysis to account for confounding factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 505 cases were reviewed. Sensitivity of the guidelines was measured at 95% with specificity at 29%. The positive and negative predictive values were 0.77 and 0.69, respectively. A total of 17 false negative cases were found. One case required surgery, during which a chronic subdural hematoma was identified. Adherence to guidelines was 56%, with the lack of analysis of S100B primarily accounting for non-adherence. A total of 54 CT scans were performed outside of guideline indications.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><div>The guidelines can effectively predict which patients need a CT scan. Increased adherence could potentially decrease the number of CT scans, while inclusion of older age limit as an independent rule-in law for CT scans would increase patient safety.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425000505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425000505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

外伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一个全球性的健康问题,也是世界范围内创伤相关死亡的主要原因。计算机断层扫描(CT)是筛查脑外伤后颅内出血的金标准。大多数TBI病例是轻度的,CT扫描呈阴性。使用不同的仪器和指南来更好地预测哪些患者需要CT扫描,并尽量减少不必要的辐射暴露和节省资源。斯堪的纳维亚神经创伤委员会指南就是这样一个工具。研究问题验证和检查遵守斯堪的纳维亚神经创伤委员会指南在Örebro县地区。材料和方法我们进行了一项回顾性研究,回顾了患者记录和数据分析。使用描述性和比较统计,以及二元逻辑回归分析来解释混杂因素。结果共审查505例。该指南的敏感性为95%,特异性为29%。阳性预测值为0.77,阴性预测值为0.69。共发现假阴性17例。一例需要手术,在此过程中发现慢性硬膜下血肿。指南的依从性为56%,缺乏S100B的分析是导致不依从性的主要原因。在指南适应症之外总共进行了54次CT扫描。讨论与结论该指南能有效预测哪些患者需要CT扫描。增加依从性可能会潜在地减少CT扫描的次数,而将年龄限制作为CT扫描的独立法规将增加患者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Scandinavian neurotrauma committee guidelines – A retrospective study in region Örebro county

Introduction

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a global health concern and a leading cause of trauma-related death worldwide. Computed tomography (CT) scan is the gold standard for screening for intracranial bleeding following TBI. Most cases of TBI are mild, with negative CT scans. Different instruments and guidelines are employed to better predict which patients need a CT scan and to minimise unnecessary radiation exposure and save resources. One such instrument is the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guidelines.

Research question

To validate and examine adherence to the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guidelines in Region Örebro County.

Material and methods

We executed a retrospective study with review of patient records and data analysis. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used, along with binary logistic regression analysis to account for confounding factors.

Results

A total of 505 cases were reviewed. Sensitivity of the guidelines was measured at 95% with specificity at 29%. The positive and negative predictive values were 0.77 and 0.69, respectively. A total of 17 false negative cases were found. One case required surgery, during which a chronic subdural hematoma was identified. Adherence to guidelines was 56%, with the lack of analysis of S100B primarily accounting for non-adherence. A total of 54 CT scans were performed outside of guideline indications.

Discussion and conclusions

The guidelines can effectively predict which patients need a CT scan. Increased adherence could potentially decrease the number of CT scans, while inclusion of older age limit as an independent rule-in law for CT scans would increase patient safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信