基于在线聊天的人工智能系统对性别确认护理心血管影响的信息评估

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

CJC Open Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2024.11.020

Brototo Deb MD, MIDS , Michael Fradley MD , Stephen Cook MD , Geoffrey D. Barnes MD, MSc

{"title":"基于在线聊天的人工智能系统对性别确认护理心血管影响的信息评估","authors":"Brototo Deb MD, MIDS , Michael Fradley MD , Stephen Cook MD , Geoffrey D. Barnes MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2024.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Because of restrictive laws in multiple states for gender-affirming care, patients might be prompted to get recommendations from contemporary online chatbots. This study explored the appropriateness of such recommendations using validated tools to assess patient education materials by a team of LGBTQ-affirming cardiologists. The study showed that although all systems emphasize the need for multidisciplinary care, there were notable differences in the comprehensiveness, cultural appropriateness, and presentation of their responses. GPT-4 (<span><span>https://chatbotapp.ai</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) and Gemini (<span><span>https://gemini.google.com/app</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) outperformed Bing (<span><span>https://copilot.microsoft.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>), particularly in the balanced and culturally sensitive delivery of information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"7 3","pages":"Pages 338-343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Information About Cardiovascular Implications of Gender-Affirming Care From Online Chat-based Artificial Intelligence Systems\",\"authors\":\"Brototo Deb MD, MIDS , Michael Fradley MD , Stephen Cook MD , Geoffrey D. Barnes MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjco.2024.11.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Because of restrictive laws in multiple states for gender-affirming care, patients might be prompted to get recommendations from contemporary online chatbots. This study explored the appropriateness of such recommendations using validated tools to assess patient education materials by a team of LGBTQ-affirming cardiologists. The study showed that although all systems emphasize the need for multidisciplinary care, there were notable differences in the comprehensiveness, cultural appropriateness, and presentation of their responses. GPT-4 (<span><span>https://chatbotapp.ai</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) and Gemini (<span><span>https://gemini.google.com/app</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) outperformed Bing (<span><span>https://copilot.microsoft.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>), particularly in the balanced and culturally sensitive delivery of information.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJC Open\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 338-343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJC Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24006000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24006000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

由于多个州对性别确认护理的限制性法律，患者可能会被提示从当代在线聊天机器人那里获得建议。本研究由一组确认lgbtq的心脏病专家使用经过验证的工具来评估患者教育材料，探讨了这些建议的适当性。研究表明，虽然所有的系统都强调需要多学科的护理，但在综合性、文化适宜性和其反应的表现方面存在显著差异。GPT-4 （https://chatbotapp.ai）和Gemini （https://gemini.google.com/app）的表现优于必应（https://copilot.microsoft.com），特别是在平衡和文化敏感的信息传递方面。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of Information About Cardiovascular Implications of Gender-Affirming Care From Online Chat-based Artificial Intelligence Systems

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluation of Information About Cardiovascular Implications of Gender-Affirming Care From Online Chat-based Artificial Intelligence Systems

Because of restrictive laws in multiple states for gender-affirming care, patients might be prompted to get recommendations from contemporary online chatbots. This study explored the appropriateness of such recommendations using validated tools to assess patient education materials by a team of LGBTQ-affirming cardiologists. The study showed that although all systems emphasize the need for multidisciplinary care, there were notable differences in the comprehensiveness, cultural appropriateness, and presentation of their responses. GPT-4 (https://chatbotapp.ai) and Gemini (https://gemini.google.com/app) outperformed Bing (https://copilot.microsoft.com), particularly in the balanced and culturally sensitive delivery of information.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊