有强化与无强化的“留-玩-说”对儿童社会行为的影响比较

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Felicia Soemarjono, Mary Louise Hemmeter, Jennifer R. Ledford, Kate Nuhring, Adrienne K. Golden, Erin E. Barton
{"title":"有强化与无强化的“留-玩-说”对儿童社会行为的影响比较","authors":"Felicia Soemarjono, Mary Louise Hemmeter, Jennifer R. Ledford, Kate Nuhring, Adrienne K. Golden, Erin E. Barton","doi":"10.1177/10983007241312418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stay-Play-Talk (SPT) is a peer-mediated intervention where peers are taught to stay, play, and talk with buddies during typical classroom activities. This study replicates and extends findings of previous SPT studies by examining the differential outcomes of SPT and SPT with reinforcement, for children who are emergent bilingual learners and socially isolated. The differentiation of levels of stay, play, and talk behaviors was evaluated, within an alternating treatments design, across three experimental conditions (SPT + Reinforcement, SPT, business-as-usual [BAU]). Following baseline (i.e., BAU), during which typical classroom activities occurred, focal participants and peer implementers were trained on SPT strategies. During both SPT and SPT + Reinforcement conditions, peer implementers were paired with focal participants for Buddy Time. The system of least prompts was used to support peer implementer use of SPT strategies. In the SPT + Reinforcement condition, peer implementers had access to reinforcers contingent on use of SPT strategies. Both SPT conditions resulted in increased levels of stay, play, and talk, compared to the BAU condition, with SPT + Reinforcement resulting in more consistent and slightly higher levels of play duration and talk. Peer implementer fidelity was higher in the SPT + Reinforcement condition. Increases in play duration were maintained across implementers. Results, limitations, implications, and next steps are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Effects of Stay-Play-Talk With or Without Reinforcement on Children’s Social Behaviors\",\"authors\":\"Felicia Soemarjono, Mary Louise Hemmeter, Jennifer R. Ledford, Kate Nuhring, Adrienne K. Golden, Erin E. Barton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10983007241312418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stay-Play-Talk (SPT) is a peer-mediated intervention where peers are taught to stay, play, and talk with buddies during typical classroom activities. This study replicates and extends findings of previous SPT studies by examining the differential outcomes of SPT and SPT with reinforcement, for children who are emergent bilingual learners and socially isolated. The differentiation of levels of stay, play, and talk behaviors was evaluated, within an alternating treatments design, across three experimental conditions (SPT + Reinforcement, SPT, business-as-usual [BAU]). Following baseline (i.e., BAU), during which typical classroom activities occurred, focal participants and peer implementers were trained on SPT strategies. During both SPT and SPT + Reinforcement conditions, peer implementers were paired with focal participants for Buddy Time. The system of least prompts was used to support peer implementer use of SPT strategies. In the SPT + Reinforcement condition, peer implementers had access to reinforcers contingent on use of SPT strategies. Both SPT conditions resulted in increased levels of stay, play, and talk, compared to the BAU condition, with SPT + Reinforcement resulting in more consistent and slightly higher levels of play duration and talk. Peer implementer fidelity was higher in the SPT + Reinforcement condition. Increases in play duration were maintained across implementers. Results, limitations, implications, and next steps are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007241312418\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007241312418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

stay - play - talk (SPT)是一种同伴调解干预,在典型的课堂活动中,同伴们被教导与朋友呆在一起,玩耍和交谈。本研究通过对新兴双语学习者和社会孤立儿童的SPT和强化SPT的不同结果进行检验,复制并扩展了先前的SPT研究结果。在交替治疗设计中,在三种实验条件下(SPT +强化、SPT、一切照旧[BAU]),评估了停留、玩耍和谈话行为水平的差异。在发生典型课堂活动的基线(即BAU)之后,重点参与者和同伴实施者接受了SPT策略的培训。在SPT和SPT +强化条件下,同伴实施者与焦点参与者配对进行伙伴时间。最小提示系统用于支持对等实施者使用SPT策略。在SPT +强化条件下,同伴实现者获得的强化取决于SPT策略的使用。与BAU条件相比,两种SPT条件都增加了停留、玩耍和谈话的时间,而SPT +强化的结果更一致,游戏持续时间和谈话的时间略高。同伴实施者保真度在SPT +强化条件下较高。各实施者的游戏持续时间均有所增加。讨论了结果、局限性、含义和下一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Effects of Stay-Play-Talk With or Without Reinforcement on Children’s Social Behaviors
Stay-Play-Talk (SPT) is a peer-mediated intervention where peers are taught to stay, play, and talk with buddies during typical classroom activities. This study replicates and extends findings of previous SPT studies by examining the differential outcomes of SPT and SPT with reinforcement, for children who are emergent bilingual learners and socially isolated. The differentiation of levels of stay, play, and talk behaviors was evaluated, within an alternating treatments design, across three experimental conditions (SPT + Reinforcement, SPT, business-as-usual [BAU]). Following baseline (i.e., BAU), during which typical classroom activities occurred, focal participants and peer implementers were trained on SPT strategies. During both SPT and SPT + Reinforcement conditions, peer implementers were paired with focal participants for Buddy Time. The system of least prompts was used to support peer implementer use of SPT strategies. In the SPT + Reinforcement condition, peer implementers had access to reinforcers contingent on use of SPT strategies. Both SPT conditions resulted in increased levels of stay, play, and talk, compared to the BAU condition, with SPT + Reinforcement resulting in more consistent and slightly higher levels of play duration and talk. Peer implementer fidelity was higher in the SPT + Reinforcement condition. Increases in play duration were maintained across implementers. Results, limitations, implications, and next steps are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: ...offers sound, research-based principles of positive behavior support for use in school, home and community settings with people with challenges in behavioral adaptation. Regular features include empirical research; discussion, literature reviews, and conceptual papers; programs, practices, and innovations; forum; and media reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信