探索如何在急性护理患者经验调查中概念化和衡量健康不平等:范围审查的协议。

HRB open research Pub Date : 2024-11-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13998.1
David Healy, John Gilmore, Jenny King, Jenny McSharry, Oonagh Meade, Éidín Ní Shé, Lorna Sweeney, Conor Foley, Chris Noone
{"title":"探索如何在急性护理患者经验调查中概念化和衡量健康不平等:范围审查的协议。","authors":"David Healy, John Gilmore, Jenny King, Jenny McSharry, Oonagh Meade, Éidín Ní Shé, Lorna Sweeney, Conor Foley, Chris Noone","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13998.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to map measured and overlooked health inequalities in patient experience surveys in acute care and to explore the potential consequences of different conceptualisations of these health inequalities.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Measuring patient experience has become standard practice in many countries. However, despite the widespread awareness of the impact of health inequalities on various aspects of health, including patient experience, a comprehensive examination of whether and how health inequalities are measured in patient experience surveys has yet to be completed. The various ways in which these surveys conceptualise health inequalities may have important implications for how information about inequalities in patient experience is reported and used to allocate resources and plan quality improvement in health services. We will analyse the papers included in this scoping review to identify ways in which health inequalities have been conceptualised and measured in patient experience surveys in acute care and the potential consequences of framing health inequalities in different ways.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Papers that contain materials relating to patient experience measurement in any acute care context will be included. No limits will be placed on patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search strategy was developed with an information specialist. The database search will be limited to after September 2021. No limit will be placed on data sources. Grey literature searches will be completed and relevant experts will also be contacted to identify any patient experience surveys not captured through database or grey literature searches. Non-English papers will be included only if resources allow. Two independent reviewers will complete title and abstract, and full-text screening. Additional reviewers will resolve any conflicts. A data extraction form was developed. The extracted data will be analysed using Critical Discourse Analysis, a qualitative method used to examine how power, dominance and inequality are enacted in text.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"7 ","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring how health inequalities are conceptualised and measured in patient experience surveys in acute care: a protocol for a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"David Healy, John Gilmore, Jenny King, Jenny McSharry, Oonagh Meade, Éidín Ní Shé, Lorna Sweeney, Conor Foley, Chris Noone\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.13998.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to map measured and overlooked health inequalities in patient experience surveys in acute care and to explore the potential consequences of different conceptualisations of these health inequalities.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Measuring patient experience has become standard practice in many countries. However, despite the widespread awareness of the impact of health inequalities on various aspects of health, including patient experience, a comprehensive examination of whether and how health inequalities are measured in patient experience surveys has yet to be completed. The various ways in which these surveys conceptualise health inequalities may have important implications for how information about inequalities in patient experience is reported and used to allocate resources and plan quality improvement in health services. We will analyse the papers included in this scoping review to identify ways in which health inequalities have been conceptualised and measured in patient experience surveys in acute care and the potential consequences of framing health inequalities in different ways.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Papers that contain materials relating to patient experience measurement in any acute care context will be included. No limits will be placed on patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search strategy was developed with an information specialist. The database search will be limited to after September 2021. No limit will be placed on data sources. Grey literature searches will be completed and relevant experts will also be contacted to identify any patient experience surveys not captured through database or grey literature searches. Non-English papers will be included only if resources allow. Two independent reviewers will complete title and abstract, and full-text screening. Additional reviewers will resolve any conflicts. A data extraction form was developed. The extracted data will be analysed using Critical Discourse Analysis, a qualitative method used to examine how power, dominance and inequality are enacted in text.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895858/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13998.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13998.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本范围审查的目的是绘制急性护理患者经验调查中测量和被忽视的健康不平等,并探讨这些健康不平等的不同概念的潜在后果。在许多国家,衡量患者经验已成为标准做法。然而,尽管人们普遍认识到健康不平等对健康各个方面的影响,包括对患者经验的影响,但尚未完成对是否以及如何在患者经验调查中衡量健康不平等的全面审查。这些调查对保健不平等现象进行概念化的各种方式,可能对如何报告和利用关于患者经验不平等的信息来分配资源和规划保健服务的质量改进产生重要影响。我们将分析本次范围审查中包含的论文,以确定在急性护理患者经验调查中对健康不平等进行概念化和衡量的方式,以及以不同方式构建健康不平等的潜在后果。纳入标准:包含与任何急性护理背景下患者体验测量相关材料的论文将被纳入。对病人的特征没有限制。方法:与信息专家一起制定搜索策略。数据库检索将限制在2021年9月以后。对数据源没有限制。将完成灰色文献检索,并联系相关专家,以确定未通过数据库或灰色文献检索捕获的任何患者体验调查。只有在资源允许的情况下,才会包括非英语论文。两名独立审稿人将完成标题、摘要和全文筛选。其他审阅者将解决任何冲突。开发了数据提取表单。提取的数据将使用批判性话语分析进行分析,这是一种用于检查权力,支配和不平等如何在文本中颁布的定性方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring how health inequalities are conceptualised and measured in patient experience surveys in acute care: a protocol for a scoping review.

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to map measured and overlooked health inequalities in patient experience surveys in acute care and to explore the potential consequences of different conceptualisations of these health inequalities.

Introduction: Measuring patient experience has become standard practice in many countries. However, despite the widespread awareness of the impact of health inequalities on various aspects of health, including patient experience, a comprehensive examination of whether and how health inequalities are measured in patient experience surveys has yet to be completed. The various ways in which these surveys conceptualise health inequalities may have important implications for how information about inequalities in patient experience is reported and used to allocate resources and plan quality improvement in health services. We will analyse the papers included in this scoping review to identify ways in which health inequalities have been conceptualised and measured in patient experience surveys in acute care and the potential consequences of framing health inequalities in different ways.

Inclusion criteria: Papers that contain materials relating to patient experience measurement in any acute care context will be included. No limits will be placed on patient characteristics.

Methods: A search strategy was developed with an information specialist. The database search will be limited to after September 2021. No limit will be placed on data sources. Grey literature searches will be completed and relevant experts will also be contacted to identify any patient experience surveys not captured through database or grey literature searches. Non-English papers will be included only if resources allow. Two independent reviewers will complete title and abstract, and full-text screening. Additional reviewers will resolve any conflicts. A data extraction form was developed. The extracted data will be analysed using Critical Discourse Analysis, a qualitative method used to examine how power, dominance and inequality are enacted in text.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信