{"title":"高速公路隧道弯道圈定标志对行车行为的影响","authors":"Jialin Mei, Zhigang Du, Pengfei Wu","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2470977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Driving on curved roads presents higher traffic safety risks compared to straight sections. However, existing research has primarily focused on open road curves, with limited studies addressing safety measures for tunnel curves. This study aims to evaluate the effects of curve delineation signs-such as chevrons, horizontal arrow signs (HASs), and retro-reflective arches (RAs)-on driver behavior at tunnel curves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The experimental design included two types of flat curve radii and four delineation sign schemes. A driving simulation experiment was conducted with 37 participants in a one-way, two-lane tunnel curve scenario, analyzing their driving behavior at tunnel curves and key curve points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chevrons and HASs effectively encourage drivers to slow down when approaching gentle curves but have a limited deceleration effect on sharp curves. Nonetheless, both signs contribute to reducing vehicle speed in both sharp and gentle curves. In contrast, the RA significantly enhances deceleration in both curve types, prompting drivers to decelerate earlier and enter the curve at a lower speed, thus lowering the average speed through the curve segment. While chevrons, HASs, and RAs all aid in adjusting lane positions and reducing lateral control risks, their effectiveness in lateral control remains limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HASs and RAs can serve as viable alternatives to chevrons in tunnel curves. In particular, the installation of three visible RAs is recommended for sharp tunnel curves to improve traffic safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of delineation signs on driving behavior in expressway tunnel curves.\",\"authors\":\"Jialin Mei, Zhigang Du, Pengfei Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2025.2470977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Driving on curved roads presents higher traffic safety risks compared to straight sections. However, existing research has primarily focused on open road curves, with limited studies addressing safety measures for tunnel curves. This study aims to evaluate the effects of curve delineation signs-such as chevrons, horizontal arrow signs (HASs), and retro-reflective arches (RAs)-on driver behavior at tunnel curves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The experimental design included two types of flat curve radii and four delineation sign schemes. A driving simulation experiment was conducted with 37 participants in a one-way, two-lane tunnel curve scenario, analyzing their driving behavior at tunnel curves and key curve points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chevrons and HASs effectively encourage drivers to slow down when approaching gentle curves but have a limited deceleration effect on sharp curves. Nonetheless, both signs contribute to reducing vehicle speed in both sharp and gentle curves. In contrast, the RA significantly enhances deceleration in both curve types, prompting drivers to decelerate earlier and enter the curve at a lower speed, thus lowering the average speed through the curve segment. While chevrons, HASs, and RAs all aid in adjusting lane positions and reducing lateral control risks, their effectiveness in lateral control remains limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HASs and RAs can serve as viable alternatives to chevrons in tunnel curves. In particular, the installation of three visible RAs is recommended for sharp tunnel curves to improve traffic safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2470977\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2470977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的与直线路段相比,在弯道上行车具有更高的交通安全风险。然而,现有的研究主要集中在开放道路的弯道上,针对隧道弯道安全措施的研究十分有限。本研究旨在评估弯道划线标志(如楔形标志、水平箭头标志(HAS)和反光拱门(RA))对隧道弯道驾驶员行为的影响:实验设计包括两种平曲线半径和四种划线标志方案。在单向双车道隧道弯道场景中,对 37 名参与者进行了驾驶模拟实验,分析他们在隧道弯道和关键弯道点的驾驶行为:结果:Chevrons 和 HAS 能有效鼓励驾驶员在接近平缓弯道时减速,但对急弯的减速效果有限。尽管如此,这两种标志在急弯和缓弯中都有助于降低车速。相比之下,RA 在两种弯道类型中都能显著提高减速效果,促使驾驶员提前减速并以较低的速度进入弯道,从而降低通过弯道段的平均速度。虽然雪佛龙、HAS 和 RA 都有助于调整车道位置和降低横向控制风险,但它们在横向控制方面的效果仍然有限:结论:在隧道弯道中,HAS 和 RA 可作为 chevrons 的可行替代品。尤其建议在隧道急弯处安装三个可见的 RA,以提高交通安全。
Effects of delineation signs on driving behavior in expressway tunnel curves.
Objective: Driving on curved roads presents higher traffic safety risks compared to straight sections. However, existing research has primarily focused on open road curves, with limited studies addressing safety measures for tunnel curves. This study aims to evaluate the effects of curve delineation signs-such as chevrons, horizontal arrow signs (HASs), and retro-reflective arches (RAs)-on driver behavior at tunnel curves.
Methods: The experimental design included two types of flat curve radii and four delineation sign schemes. A driving simulation experiment was conducted with 37 participants in a one-way, two-lane tunnel curve scenario, analyzing their driving behavior at tunnel curves and key curve points.
Results: Chevrons and HASs effectively encourage drivers to slow down when approaching gentle curves but have a limited deceleration effect on sharp curves. Nonetheless, both signs contribute to reducing vehicle speed in both sharp and gentle curves. In contrast, the RA significantly enhances deceleration in both curve types, prompting drivers to decelerate earlier and enter the curve at a lower speed, thus lowering the average speed through the curve segment. While chevrons, HASs, and RAs all aid in adjusting lane positions and reducing lateral control risks, their effectiveness in lateral control remains limited.
Conclusions: HASs and RAs can serve as viable alternatives to chevrons in tunnel curves. In particular, the installation of three visible RAs is recommended for sharp tunnel curves to improve traffic safety.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment.
General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.