特质焦虑与信念更新:探究负性偏见与对比回避的作用。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Guillermo Solovey, Alejandro Usaj, Soledad Picco, Juan Cruz Beron, Mariela Sued, María Eugenia Szretter Noste, Luz Bavassi, Maria E Pedreira, Rodrigo S Fernández
{"title":"特质焦虑与信念更新:探究负性偏见与对比回避的作用。","authors":"Guillermo Solovey, Alejandro Usaj, Soledad Picco, Juan Cruz Beron, Mariela Sued, María Eugenia Szretter Noste, Luz Bavassi, Maria E Pedreira, Rodrigo S Fernández","doi":"10.3758/s13415-025-01282-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Beliefs play a crucial role in shaping our behaviors and mental health outcomes. Asymmetric belief updating refers to the phenomenon where desirable information is updated more readily than undesirable information. An essential feature of anxiety is threat-overestimation and a tendency to focus on the negative aspects of experience while avoiding sharp negative emotional contrasts. These two characteristics lead to different predictions concerning belief updating. One scenario would suggest a reduction in asymmetric update behavior, indicating negativity bias, whereas the other would indicate an increase in asymmetric update, indicating contrast avoidance. To test these two rival predictions, participants (n = 54) first completed trait-measures and then performed a belief update task. Moreover, memory for the information presented was assessed in the short-term and long-term. Skin conductance response was measured to assess arousal levels. Overall, our findings revealed that higher levels of trait-anxiety predicted a greater integration of desirable information but not undesirable information. Trait-intolerance of uncertainty did not exhibit an association with update behavior. Skin conductance and memory were not associated with trait-measures. We discuss these results in line with the Contrast Avoidance Model of anxiety in terms of avoidance of unexpected negative and positive contrasts induced by relief during belief updating.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trait-anxiety and belief updating: Exploring the role of negativity bias and contrast avoidance.\",\"authors\":\"Guillermo Solovey, Alejandro Usaj, Soledad Picco, Juan Cruz Beron, Mariela Sued, María Eugenia Szretter Noste, Luz Bavassi, Maria E Pedreira, Rodrigo S Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13415-025-01282-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Beliefs play a crucial role in shaping our behaviors and mental health outcomes. Asymmetric belief updating refers to the phenomenon where desirable information is updated more readily than undesirable information. An essential feature of anxiety is threat-overestimation and a tendency to focus on the negative aspects of experience while avoiding sharp negative emotional contrasts. These two characteristics lead to different predictions concerning belief updating. One scenario would suggest a reduction in asymmetric update behavior, indicating negativity bias, whereas the other would indicate an increase in asymmetric update, indicating contrast avoidance. To test these two rival predictions, participants (n = 54) first completed trait-measures and then performed a belief update task. Moreover, memory for the information presented was assessed in the short-term and long-term. Skin conductance response was measured to assess arousal levels. Overall, our findings revealed that higher levels of trait-anxiety predicted a greater integration of desirable information but not undesirable information. Trait-intolerance of uncertainty did not exhibit an association with update behavior. Skin conductance and memory were not associated with trait-measures. We discuss these results in line with the Contrast Avoidance Model of anxiety in terms of avoidance of unexpected negative and positive contrasts induced by relief during belief updating.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01282-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01282-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信念在塑造我们的行为和心理健康结果方面起着至关重要的作用。不对称信念更新是指理想信息比不理想信息更容易更新的现象。焦虑的一个基本特征是威胁高估和倾向于关注经验的消极方面,同时避免强烈的消极情绪对比。这两个特征导致了对信念更新的不同预测。一种情况表明非对称更新行为的减少,表明消极偏见,而另一种情况表明非对称更新行为的增加,表明回避对比。为了验证这两种对立的预测,参与者(n = 54)首先完成了特征测量,然后执行了信念更新任务。此外,对所呈现的信息的记忆进行了短期和长期评估。测量皮肤电导反应以评估唤醒水平。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,更高水平的特质焦虑预示着更大程度的对理想信息的整合,而不是对不良信息的整合。不确定性的性状不耐受与更新行为没有关联。皮肤电导和记忆与性状测量无关。我们根据焦虑的对比回避模型来讨论这些结果,以避免在信念更新过程中由缓解引起的意外的消极和积极对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trait-anxiety and belief updating: Exploring the role of negativity bias and contrast avoidance.

Beliefs play a crucial role in shaping our behaviors and mental health outcomes. Asymmetric belief updating refers to the phenomenon where desirable information is updated more readily than undesirable information. An essential feature of anxiety is threat-overestimation and a tendency to focus on the negative aspects of experience while avoiding sharp negative emotional contrasts. These two characteristics lead to different predictions concerning belief updating. One scenario would suggest a reduction in asymmetric update behavior, indicating negativity bias, whereas the other would indicate an increase in asymmetric update, indicating contrast avoidance. To test these two rival predictions, participants (n = 54) first completed trait-measures and then performed a belief update task. Moreover, memory for the information presented was assessed in the short-term and long-term. Skin conductance response was measured to assess arousal levels. Overall, our findings revealed that higher levels of trait-anxiety predicted a greater integration of desirable information but not undesirable information. Trait-intolerance of uncertainty did not exhibit an association with update behavior. Skin conductance and memory were not associated with trait-measures. We discuss these results in line with the Contrast Avoidance Model of anxiety in terms of avoidance of unexpected negative and positive contrasts induced by relief during belief updating.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信