新教育工作者素质提升教育的实践途径

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sherry Liang, Jacob Khoury
{"title":"新教育工作者素质提升教育的实践途径","authors":"Sherry Liang, Jacob Khoury","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's mandate for quality improvement (QI) training in residency programs has generated discussion in the literature of QI best practices and curriculum models. Despite this requirement, residents continue to report limited exposure to domains like available QI expertise, access to data collection, QI knowledge, and ability to complete all project stages.While the barriers to successful QI project implementation are numerous, the lack of experienced QI educators is also a major limitation. Educators new to QI education may not know how to approach common project pitfalls residents face, namely their tendency to jump to the \"do\" phase in a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle without prior framing of the problem through process evaluation and identification of timely measures. These pitfalls can lead to many unintended consequences, including diminished physician engagement in QI work.To focus residents on learning about health systems, the authors draw on their collective experiences as learners and educators to propose a practical approach for new QI educators, consisting of 4 objectives: (1) illustrate and evaluate the process; (2) obtain meaningful and timely measures; (3) propose an intervention and obtain feedback from high-level stakeholders; and (4) reflect on lessons learned throughout the endeavor. The authors assert that by prioritizing these objectives before embarking on a PDSA cycle, residents will learn more about systems of care, gain competency in analyzing these systems, and continue QI efforts successfully in their future careers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Practical Approach to Quality Improvement Education for New Educators.\",\"authors\":\"Sherry Liang, Jacob Khoury\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's mandate for quality improvement (QI) training in residency programs has generated discussion in the literature of QI best practices and curriculum models. Despite this requirement, residents continue to report limited exposure to domains like available QI expertise, access to data collection, QI knowledge, and ability to complete all project stages.While the barriers to successful QI project implementation are numerous, the lack of experienced QI educators is also a major limitation. Educators new to QI education may not know how to approach common project pitfalls residents face, namely their tendency to jump to the \\\"do\\\" phase in a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle without prior framing of the problem through process evaluation and identification of timely measures. These pitfalls can lead to many unintended consequences, including diminished physician engagement in QI work.To focus residents on learning about health systems, the authors draw on their collective experiences as learners and educators to propose a practical approach for new QI educators, consisting of 4 objectives: (1) illustrate and evaluate the process; (2) obtain meaningful and timely measures; (3) propose an intervention and obtain feedback from high-level stakeholders; and (4) reflect on lessons learned throughout the endeavor. The authors assert that by prioritizing these objectives before embarking on a PDSA cycle, residents will learn more about systems of care, gain competency in analyzing these systems, and continue QI efforts successfully in their future careers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:研究生医学教育认证委员会对住院医师项目质量改进(QI)培训的授权已经在关于QI最佳实践和课程模式的文献中引起了讨论。尽管有这样的要求,居民仍然报告说,他们对可用的QI专业知识、数据收集的访问、QI知识和完成所有项目阶段的能力等领域的了解有限。虽然成功实施QI项目的障碍很多,但缺乏经验丰富的QI教育者也是一个主要限制。刚接触QI教育的教育者可能不知道如何处理居民面临的常见项目陷阱,即他们倾向于在没有事先通过过程评估和及时措施确定问题框架的情况下跳到计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)循环的“执行”阶段。这些陷阱可能导致许多意想不到的后果,包括减少医生参与气的工作。为了使居民关注卫生系统的学习,作者借鉴了他们作为学习者和教育者的集体经验,为新的QI教育者提出了一种实用的方法,包括4个目标:(1)说明和评估这一过程;(2)获得有意义和及时的措施;(3)提出干预措施并获得高层利益相关者的反馈;(4)反思在努力过程中吸取的教训。作者断言,在开始PDSA循环之前,通过优先考虑这些目标,居民将更多地了解护理系统,获得分析这些系统的能力,并在未来的职业生涯中继续成功地进行QI工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Practical Approach to Quality Improvement Education for New Educators.

Abstract: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's mandate for quality improvement (QI) training in residency programs has generated discussion in the literature of QI best practices and curriculum models. Despite this requirement, residents continue to report limited exposure to domains like available QI expertise, access to data collection, QI knowledge, and ability to complete all project stages.While the barriers to successful QI project implementation are numerous, the lack of experienced QI educators is also a major limitation. Educators new to QI education may not know how to approach common project pitfalls residents face, namely their tendency to jump to the "do" phase in a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle without prior framing of the problem through process evaluation and identification of timely measures. These pitfalls can lead to many unintended consequences, including diminished physician engagement in QI work.To focus residents on learning about health systems, the authors draw on their collective experiences as learners and educators to propose a practical approach for new QI educators, consisting of 4 objectives: (1) illustrate and evaluate the process; (2) obtain meaningful and timely measures; (3) propose an intervention and obtain feedback from high-level stakeholders; and (4) reflect on lessons learned throughout the endeavor. The authors assert that by prioritizing these objectives before embarking on a PDSA cycle, residents will learn more about systems of care, gain competency in analyzing these systems, and continue QI efforts successfully in their future careers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信