太浩湖沿岸小径溪流中病理微生物的调查。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1177/10806032251318228
Hannah A Miller, Robby S Boparai, Joshua J Warner, Stephen F Mowery, Anna C Smith, Anthony P Cummins, Jennifer L Wittmann, David C Fiore
{"title":"太浩湖沿岸小径溪流中病理微生物的调查。","authors":"Hannah A Miller, Robby S Boparai, Joshua J Warner, Stephen F Mowery, Anna C Smith, Anthony P Cummins, Jennifer L Wittmann, David C Fiore","doi":"10.1177/10806032251318228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThis study aimed to estimate the contamination of water sources along the Tahoe Rim Trail (TRT) through evaluation of the presence and concentration of <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Giardia,</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp.MethodsSample sites were selected from 6 of the 8 sections of the TRT. Each stream was sampled 3 or 4 times during the summer and early fall of 2023. Samples were collected and analyzed for <i>E. coli</i> using Standard Methods 9223B and <i>Giardia</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp. using EPA Method 1623.Results<i>E. coli</i> counts ranged from <1 to 29.2 most probable number (MPN)/100 mL. There was no difference in contamination with <i>E. coli</i> between streams (<i>P</i>=0.287) or sampling rounds (<i>P</i>=0.413). <i>Giardia</i> counts ranged from 0 to 7 count/10 L. There was a difference in contamination with <i>Giardia</i> between the highest and lowest concentration streams (<i>P</i>=0.028) but no difference in contamination between other streams or between sampling rounds (<i>P</i>=0.924). <i>Cryptosporidium</i> counts ranged from 0 to 1 count/10 L. There was no difference in contamination with <i>Cryptosporidium</i> between streams (<i>P</i>=0.589) or between sampling rounds (<i>P</i>=0.888).Conclusions<i>E. coli</i>, <i>Giardia,</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> are present in the streams along the TRT. Results from this study show that the risk of illness from occasional direct consumption of water from the streams sampled is low; however, it is always advisable to filter or treat water from any backcountry source prior to consumption. More extensive studies are recommended to evaluate backcountry water sources in the Tahoe Basin to further evaluate the risk to human health from direct consumption<b>.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"194-200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey of Pathologic Microorganisms in the Streams Along the Tahoe Rim Trail.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah A Miller, Robby S Boparai, Joshua J Warner, Stephen F Mowery, Anna C Smith, Anthony P Cummins, Jennifer L Wittmann, David C Fiore\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10806032251318228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionThis study aimed to estimate the contamination of water sources along the Tahoe Rim Trail (TRT) through evaluation of the presence and concentration of <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Giardia,</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp.MethodsSample sites were selected from 6 of the 8 sections of the TRT. Each stream was sampled 3 or 4 times during the summer and early fall of 2023. Samples were collected and analyzed for <i>E. coli</i> using Standard Methods 9223B and <i>Giardia</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp. using EPA Method 1623.Results<i>E. coli</i> counts ranged from <1 to 29.2 most probable number (MPN)/100 mL. There was no difference in contamination with <i>E. coli</i> between streams (<i>P</i>=0.287) or sampling rounds (<i>P</i>=0.413). <i>Giardia</i> counts ranged from 0 to 7 count/10 L. There was a difference in contamination with <i>Giardia</i> between the highest and lowest concentration streams (<i>P</i>=0.028) but no difference in contamination between other streams or between sampling rounds (<i>P</i>=0.924). <i>Cryptosporidium</i> counts ranged from 0 to 1 count/10 L. There was no difference in contamination with <i>Cryptosporidium</i> between streams (<i>P</i>=0.589) or between sampling rounds (<i>P</i>=0.888).Conclusions<i>E. coli</i>, <i>Giardia,</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> are present in the streams along the TRT. Results from this study show that the risk of illness from occasional direct consumption of water from the streams sampled is low; however, it is always advisable to filter or treat water from any backcountry source prior to consumption. More extensive studies are recommended to evaluate backcountry water sources in the Tahoe Basin to further evaluate the risk to human health from direct consumption<b>.</b></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"194-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251318228\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251318228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过对塔霍湖环径(Tahoe Rim Trail, TRT)水源中大肠埃希菌、贾第鞭毛虫和隐孢子虫的存在和浓度进行评估,以评估水源的污染情况。在2023年的夏季和初秋,每条溪流都被采样了3到4次。大肠杆菌采用标准方法9223B,贾第鞭毛虫和隐孢子虫采用EPA方法1623。大肠杆菌计数从溪流之间的大肠杆菌(P=0.287)到采样轮之间的大肠杆菌(P=0.413)不等。贾第鞭毛虫计数范围为0 ~ 7支/10 l。贾第鞭毛虫污染在最高浓度和最低浓度的河流之间存在差异(P=0.028),但在其他河流和采样轮之间没有差异(P=0.924)。隐孢子虫计数范围为0 ~ 1支/ 10l。不同溪流间隐孢子虫污染差异无统计学意义(P=0.589),不同采样轮间隐孢子虫污染差异无统计学意义(P=0.888)。大肠杆菌、贾第鞭毛虫和隐孢子虫存在于沿TRT的溪流中。这项研究的结果表明,偶尔直接饮用采样溪流中的水而患病的风险很低;然而,建议在饮用之前过滤或处理来自任何偏远地区的水。建议进行更广泛的研究,以评估太浩盆地的偏远地区水源,以进一步评估直接饮用对人类健康的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survey of Pathologic Microorganisms in the Streams Along the Tahoe Rim Trail.

IntroductionThis study aimed to estimate the contamination of water sources along the Tahoe Rim Trail (TRT) through evaluation of the presence and concentration of Escherichia coli, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium spp.MethodsSample sites were selected from 6 of the 8 sections of the TRT. Each stream was sampled 3 or 4 times during the summer and early fall of 2023. Samples were collected and analyzed for E. coli using Standard Methods 9223B and Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. using EPA Method 1623.ResultsE. coli counts ranged from <1 to 29.2 most probable number (MPN)/100 mL. There was no difference in contamination with E. coli between streams (P=0.287) or sampling rounds (P=0.413). Giardia counts ranged from 0 to 7 count/10 L. There was a difference in contamination with Giardia between the highest and lowest concentration streams (P=0.028) but no difference in contamination between other streams or between sampling rounds (P=0.924). Cryptosporidium counts ranged from 0 to 1 count/10 L. There was no difference in contamination with Cryptosporidium between streams (P=0.589) or between sampling rounds (P=0.888).ConclusionsE. coli, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium are present in the streams along the TRT. Results from this study show that the risk of illness from occasional direct consumption of water from the streams sampled is low; however, it is always advisable to filter or treat water from any backcountry source prior to consumption. More extensive studies are recommended to evaluate backcountry water sources in the Tahoe Basin to further evaluate the risk to human health from direct consumption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信