印度公立与私立医疗机构中常见精神障碍的症状网络

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2025.16
Cemile Ceren Sönmez, Helen Verdeli, Matteo Malgaroli, Jaime Delgadillo, Bryan Keller
{"title":"印度公立与私立医疗机构中常见精神障碍的症状网络","authors":"Cemile Ceren Sönmez, Helen Verdeli, Matteo Malgaroli, Jaime Delgadillo, Bryan Keller","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present a series of network analyses aiming to uncover the symptom constellations of depression, anxiety and somatization among 2,796 adult primary health care attendees in Goa, India, a low- and middle-income country (LMIC). Depression and anxiety are the leading neuropsychiatric causes of disability. Yet, the diagnostic boundaries and the characteristics of their dynamically intertwined symptom constellations remain obscure, particularly in non-Western settings. Regularized partial correlation networks were estimated and the diagnostic boundaries were explored using community detection analysis. The global and local connectivity of network structures of public versus private healthcare settings and treatment responders versus nonresponders were compared with a permutation test. Overall, depressed mood, panic, fatigue, concentration problems and somatic symptoms were the most central. Leveraging the longitudinal nature of the data, our analyses revealed baseline networks did not differ across treatment responders and nonresponders. The results did not support distinct illness subclusters of the CMDs. For public healthcare settings, panic was the most central symptom, whereas in private, fatigue was the most central. Findings highlight varying mechanism of illness development across socioeconomic backgrounds, with potential implications for case identification and treatment. This is the first study directly comparing the symptom constellations of two socioeconomically different groups in an LMIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symptom networks of common mental disorders in public versus private healthcare settings in India.\",\"authors\":\"Cemile Ceren Sönmez, Helen Verdeli, Matteo Malgaroli, Jaime Delgadillo, Bryan Keller\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/gmh.2025.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We present a series of network analyses aiming to uncover the symptom constellations of depression, anxiety and somatization among 2,796 adult primary health care attendees in Goa, India, a low- and middle-income country (LMIC). Depression and anxiety are the leading neuropsychiatric causes of disability. Yet, the diagnostic boundaries and the characteristics of their dynamically intertwined symptom constellations remain obscure, particularly in non-Western settings. Regularized partial correlation networks were estimated and the diagnostic boundaries were explored using community detection analysis. The global and local connectivity of network structures of public versus private healthcare settings and treatment responders versus nonresponders were compared with a permutation test. Overall, depressed mood, panic, fatigue, concentration problems and somatic symptoms were the most central. Leveraging the longitudinal nature of the data, our analyses revealed baseline networks did not differ across treatment responders and nonresponders. The results did not support distinct illness subclusters of the CMDs. For public healthcare settings, panic was the most central symptom, whereas in private, fatigue was the most central. Findings highlight varying mechanism of illness development across socioeconomic backgrounds, with potential implications for case identification and treatment. This is the first study directly comparing the symptom constellations of two socioeconomically different groups in an LMIC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"e30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.16\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.16","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了一系列的网络分析,旨在揭示抑郁,焦虑和躯体化的症状群在果阿,印度,一个低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的2,796成人初级卫生保健参加者。抑郁和焦虑是导致残疾的主要神经精神原因。然而,诊断的界限和他们的动态交织的症状星座的特点仍然是模糊的,特别是在非西方设置。估计正则化部分相关网络,并利用社区检测分析探索诊断边界。通过排列测试比较了公共和私人医疗机构以及治疗应答者和无应答者的网络结构的全球和本地连通性。总的来说,抑郁情绪、恐慌、疲劳、注意力不集中和躯体症状是最主要的。利用数据的纵向特性,我们的分析显示基线网络在治疗应答者和无应答者之间没有差异。结果不支持不同的疾病亚群的cmd。在公共医疗机构,恐慌是最主要的症状,而在私人医疗机构,疲劳是最主要的症状。研究结果强调了不同社会经济背景下疾病发展的不同机制,对病例识别和治疗具有潜在的意义。这是第一个直接比较LMIC中两个社会经济不同群体的症状星座的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Symptom networks of common mental disorders in public versus private healthcare settings in India.

We present a series of network analyses aiming to uncover the symptom constellations of depression, anxiety and somatization among 2,796 adult primary health care attendees in Goa, India, a low- and middle-income country (LMIC). Depression and anxiety are the leading neuropsychiatric causes of disability. Yet, the diagnostic boundaries and the characteristics of their dynamically intertwined symptom constellations remain obscure, particularly in non-Western settings. Regularized partial correlation networks were estimated and the diagnostic boundaries were explored using community detection analysis. The global and local connectivity of network structures of public versus private healthcare settings and treatment responders versus nonresponders were compared with a permutation test. Overall, depressed mood, panic, fatigue, concentration problems and somatic symptoms were the most central. Leveraging the longitudinal nature of the data, our analyses revealed baseline networks did not differ across treatment responders and nonresponders. The results did not support distinct illness subclusters of the CMDs. For public healthcare settings, panic was the most central symptom, whereas in private, fatigue was the most central. Findings highlight varying mechanism of illness development across socioeconomic backgrounds, with potential implications for case identification and treatment. This is the first study directly comparing the symptom constellations of two socioeconomically different groups in an LMIC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信