Yogita Sharma, Parikipandla Sridevi, Deepa Bhat, Shaily B Surti, Jatin Sarmah, Godi Sudhakar, Manoranjan Ranjit, Bontha V Babu
{"title":"印度部落人口获得医疗保健的机会:一项横断面家庭调查。","authors":"Yogita Sharma, Parikipandla Sridevi, Deepa Bhat, Shaily B Surti, Jatin Sarmah, Godi Sudhakar, Manoranjan Ranjit, Bontha V Babu","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study addresses significant healthcare access challenges faced by India's 104 million-strong tribal population, who are among the most disadvantaged and typically live in hilly rural and remote areas with poor health infrastructure and resources. The study aims to examine healthcare access patterns in six tribal areas, focussing on primary health centres (PHCs), to develop a strategy that improves healthcare service accessibility, quality, and utilization for tribal communities. Data were collected from 9837 participants from 24 PHC areas across six states. Most respondents (78.8%; CI: 77.98-79.61) reported monthly visits of government health workers to their habitations, indicating regular healthcare access. Two-thirds confirmed house visits in the last 3 months, primarily receiving immunisation services. A significant portion (57.38%; CI: 56.39-58.36) received health education, and a majority (64.29%; CI: 63.33-65.24) were satisfied with the services. About 77% depend on PHC and its healthcare staff, though state-wise variations exist. Common reasons for not using these services included distance (17.45%; CI: 16.71-18.22) and lack of trust (4.57%; CI: 4.17-5.01). Most respondents were examined by a doctor (60.32%; CI: 59.35-61.29) and received diagnostic tests (27.50%; CI: 26.62-28.39). Walking (21.88%; CI: 21.6-22.71) and auto-rickshaw/cab (20.23%; CI: 19.44-21.04) were the most common travel modes, with a mean travel time of 34 min. The data highlights the tribal population's preferences and experiences with primary healthcare services. Understanding these patterns can guide the design implementation research to further improve accessibility and utilisation of primary healthcare services among these vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to Healthcare Among Tribal Population in India: A Cross-Sectional Household Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Yogita Sharma, Parikipandla Sridevi, Deepa Bhat, Shaily B Surti, Jatin Sarmah, Godi Sudhakar, Manoranjan Ranjit, Bontha V Babu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.3924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study addresses significant healthcare access challenges faced by India's 104 million-strong tribal population, who are among the most disadvantaged and typically live in hilly rural and remote areas with poor health infrastructure and resources. The study aims to examine healthcare access patterns in six tribal areas, focussing on primary health centres (PHCs), to develop a strategy that improves healthcare service accessibility, quality, and utilization for tribal communities. Data were collected from 9837 participants from 24 PHC areas across six states. Most respondents (78.8%; CI: 77.98-79.61) reported monthly visits of government health workers to their habitations, indicating regular healthcare access. Two-thirds confirmed house visits in the last 3 months, primarily receiving immunisation services. A significant portion (57.38%; CI: 56.39-58.36) received health education, and a majority (64.29%; CI: 63.33-65.24) were satisfied with the services. About 77% depend on PHC and its healthcare staff, though state-wise variations exist. Common reasons for not using these services included distance (17.45%; CI: 16.71-18.22) and lack of trust (4.57%; CI: 4.17-5.01). Most respondents were examined by a doctor (60.32%; CI: 59.35-61.29) and received diagnostic tests (27.50%; CI: 26.62-28.39). Walking (21.88%; CI: 21.6-22.71) and auto-rickshaw/cab (20.23%; CI: 19.44-21.04) were the most common travel modes, with a mean travel time of 34 min. The data highlights the tribal population's preferences and experiences with primary healthcare services. Understanding these patterns can guide the design implementation research to further improve accessibility and utilisation of primary healthcare services among these vulnerable populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3924\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Access to Healthcare Among Tribal Population in India: A Cross-Sectional Household Survey.
This study addresses significant healthcare access challenges faced by India's 104 million-strong tribal population, who are among the most disadvantaged and typically live in hilly rural and remote areas with poor health infrastructure and resources. The study aims to examine healthcare access patterns in six tribal areas, focussing on primary health centres (PHCs), to develop a strategy that improves healthcare service accessibility, quality, and utilization for tribal communities. Data were collected from 9837 participants from 24 PHC areas across six states. Most respondents (78.8%; CI: 77.98-79.61) reported monthly visits of government health workers to their habitations, indicating regular healthcare access. Two-thirds confirmed house visits in the last 3 months, primarily receiving immunisation services. A significant portion (57.38%; CI: 56.39-58.36) received health education, and a majority (64.29%; CI: 63.33-65.24) were satisfied with the services. About 77% depend on PHC and its healthcare staff, though state-wise variations exist. Common reasons for not using these services included distance (17.45%; CI: 16.71-18.22) and lack of trust (4.57%; CI: 4.17-5.01). Most respondents were examined by a doctor (60.32%; CI: 59.35-61.29) and received diagnostic tests (27.50%; CI: 26.62-28.39). Walking (21.88%; CI: 21.6-22.71) and auto-rickshaw/cab (20.23%; CI: 19.44-21.04) were the most common travel modes, with a mean travel time of 34 min. The data highlights the tribal population's preferences and experiences with primary healthcare services. Understanding these patterns can guide the design implementation research to further improve accessibility and utilisation of primary healthcare services among these vulnerable populations.
期刊介绍:
Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.