多专业机器人辅助手术的环境影响:浪费审计分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Gerald Tjahyadi, Patrick-Julien Treacy, Kate Alexander, Jacob Bird, Sascha Karunaratne, Scott Leslie, Kate McBride, Daniel Steffens, Ruban Thanigasalam
{"title":"多专业机器人辅助手术的环境影响:浪费审计分析。","authors":"Gerald Tjahyadi, Patrick-Julien Treacy, Kate Alexander, Jacob Bird, Sascha Karunaratne, Scott Leslie, Kate McBride, Daniel Steffens, Ruban Thanigasalam","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02278-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern advances in medicine and technology have led to an increase in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) cases. However, concerns have been raised about the potential environmental impact of RAS. Despite this, only limited quantitative evidence is currently available. Therefore, this study aims to objectively quantify the environmental impact of a multi-specialty RAS caseload at an Australian public tertiary hospital. An analysis was performed to quantify the amount of waste produced on a consecutive multi-specialty RAS caseload performed between August 2016 and March 2023 at a major public hospital. The weight of each instrument and consumable was measured and the total weight of discarded waste was calculated for each RAS case. A total of 671 patients underwent RAS using the da Vinci Xi System, including Urology (n = 341, 50.8%), Cardiothoracic (n = 158, 23.5%), Gynaecology (n = 107, 16.0%), and Colorectal (n = 65, 9.7%). Overall, the amount of waste was 2,948.9 kg, with single-use items contributing the largest volume (93.9%). Cardiothoracic generated the lowest average weight of waste per case (3.04 kg) while Colorectal generated the highest (5.27 kg). Overall, the da Vinci Xi instrument arm drape was the single item with the largest contribution to the total weight of waste (32.9%). RAS generates substantial waste, primarily from single-use items. These findings underscore the need for strategies to mitigate the environmental footprint of RAS as its adoption continues to grow.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The environmental impact of multi-specialty robotic-assisted surgery: a waste audit analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gerald Tjahyadi, Patrick-Julien Treacy, Kate Alexander, Jacob Bird, Sascha Karunaratne, Scott Leslie, Kate McBride, Daniel Steffens, Ruban Thanigasalam\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11701-025-02278-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Modern advances in medicine and technology have led to an increase in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) cases. However, concerns have been raised about the potential environmental impact of RAS. Despite this, only limited quantitative evidence is currently available. Therefore, this study aims to objectively quantify the environmental impact of a multi-specialty RAS caseload at an Australian public tertiary hospital. An analysis was performed to quantify the amount of waste produced on a consecutive multi-specialty RAS caseload performed between August 2016 and March 2023 at a major public hospital. The weight of each instrument and consumable was measured and the total weight of discarded waste was calculated for each RAS case. A total of 671 patients underwent RAS using the da Vinci Xi System, including Urology (n = 341, 50.8%), Cardiothoracic (n = 158, 23.5%), Gynaecology (n = 107, 16.0%), and Colorectal (n = 65, 9.7%). Overall, the amount of waste was 2,948.9 kg, with single-use items contributing the largest volume (93.9%). Cardiothoracic generated the lowest average weight of waste per case (3.04 kg) while Colorectal generated the highest (5.27 kg). Overall, the da Vinci Xi instrument arm drape was the single item with the largest contribution to the total weight of waste (32.9%). RAS generates substantial waste, primarily from single-use items. These findings underscore the need for strategies to mitigate the environmental footprint of RAS as its adoption continues to grow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897078/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02278-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02278-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代医学和技术的进步导致机器人辅助手术(RAS)病例的增加。然而,RAS的潜在环境影响引起了人们的关注。尽管如此,目前只有有限的定量证据。因此,本研究旨在客观量化澳大利亚公立三级医院多专科RAS病例量对环境的影响。对2016年8月至2023年3月在一家大型公立医院连续进行的多专业RAS病例进行了分析,以量化产生的废物量。测量每台仪器和耗材的重量,并计算每个RAS病例的废弃废物总重量。共有671例患者使用达芬奇系统接受了RAS,包括泌尿科(n = 341, 50.8%)、心胸科(n = 158, 23.5%)、妇科(n = 107, 16.0%)和结直肠(n = 65, 9.7%)。总的来说,垃圾量为2948.9公斤,其中一次性物品的垃圾量最大(93.9%)。胸外科平均每例产生的废物重量最低(3.04 kg),结肠直肠最高(5.27 kg)。总的来说,达芬奇Xi仪器手臂悬垂是占总浪费重量最大的单项(32.9%)。RAS产生大量废物,主要来自一次性物品。这些发现强调,随着RAS的采用不断增加,需要制定策略来减轻RAS的环境足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The environmental impact of multi-specialty robotic-assisted surgery: a waste audit analysis.

Modern advances in medicine and technology have led to an increase in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) cases. However, concerns have been raised about the potential environmental impact of RAS. Despite this, only limited quantitative evidence is currently available. Therefore, this study aims to objectively quantify the environmental impact of a multi-specialty RAS caseload at an Australian public tertiary hospital. An analysis was performed to quantify the amount of waste produced on a consecutive multi-specialty RAS caseload performed between August 2016 and March 2023 at a major public hospital. The weight of each instrument and consumable was measured and the total weight of discarded waste was calculated for each RAS case. A total of 671 patients underwent RAS using the da Vinci Xi System, including Urology (n = 341, 50.8%), Cardiothoracic (n = 158, 23.5%), Gynaecology (n = 107, 16.0%), and Colorectal (n = 65, 9.7%). Overall, the amount of waste was 2,948.9 kg, with single-use items contributing the largest volume (93.9%). Cardiothoracic generated the lowest average weight of waste per case (3.04 kg) while Colorectal generated the highest (5.27 kg). Overall, the da Vinci Xi instrument arm drape was the single item with the largest contribution to the total weight of waste (32.9%). RAS generates substantial waste, primarily from single-use items. These findings underscore the need for strategies to mitigate the environmental footprint of RAS as its adoption continues to grow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信