综合神经肌肉抑制技术对颈部疼痛和头部前倾受试者的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION
Rania Reffat Ali, Somaya Nady Mohamed Elsayed, Ragia Mohamed Kamel, Ebtisam Mohamed Fahmy, Hend Ahmed Hamdy
{"title":"综合神经肌肉抑制技术对颈部疼痛和头部前倾受试者的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Rania Reffat Ali, Somaya Nady Mohamed Elsayed, Ragia Mohamed Kamel, Ebtisam Mohamed Fahmy, Hend Ahmed Hamdy","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2025.2476662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Forward head posture (FHP) and neck pain are common musculoskeletal complaints. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique (INIT) on the range of motion (ROM) and craniovertebral angle (CVA) in individuals with FHP and neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 40 physical therapy participants (26 females and 14 males), aged 18 to 23 years (mean age: 20 ± 1.71 years), participated in this study. They were randomized into two groups: Group A received conventional therapy combined with Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique (INIT) targeting the upper trapezius and suboccipital muscles, while Group B received conventional therapy consisting of strengthening and stretching exercises only. The treatment was administered three times per week for one month.Photographic sessions were conducted using a mobile phone. A Realme 7 Pro camera and CorelDRAW software were employed to analyze the craniovertebral angle (CVA). A pressure algometer was used to measure the pressure pain threshold (PPT), while a visual analogue scale (VAS) was utilized to assess pain severity. Additionally, a clinometer application on an Android device was used to evaluate cervical range of motion (ROM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in craniovertebral angle (CVA) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, with Group A showing a 16.12% improvement in CVA and a 75.61% reduction in VAS, compared to a 7.20% improvement in CVA and a 57.14% reduction in VAS in Group B.Group A also showed a significantly greater post-treatment increase in CVA (<i>p</i> = 0.01), cervical range of motion (ROM) for flexion (<i>p</i> = 0.002), extension (<i>p</i> = 0.005), right bending (<i>p</i> = 0.001), left bending (<i>p</i> = 0.001), right rotation (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and left rotation (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Additionally, Group A exhibited a significantly greater decrease in VAS (<i>p</i> = 0.003) compared to Group B following treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition (INI) technique, which combines ischemic compression, strain-counterstrain, and muscle energy techniques, yields superior outcomes compared to conventional therapy alone for individuals with forward head posture (FHP) and neck pain. It is particularly effective in improving craniovertebral angle (CVA), reducing pain levels, and enhancing cervical range of motion (ROM).</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on subjects with neck pain and forward head posture: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rania Reffat Ali, Somaya Nady Mohamed Elsayed, Ragia Mohamed Kamel, Ebtisam Mohamed Fahmy, Hend Ahmed Hamdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10669817.2025.2476662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Forward head posture (FHP) and neck pain are common musculoskeletal complaints. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique (INIT) on the range of motion (ROM) and craniovertebral angle (CVA) in individuals with FHP and neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 40 physical therapy participants (26 females and 14 males), aged 18 to 23 years (mean age: 20 ± 1.71 years), participated in this study. They were randomized into two groups: Group A received conventional therapy combined with Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique (INIT) targeting the upper trapezius and suboccipital muscles, while Group B received conventional therapy consisting of strengthening and stretching exercises only. The treatment was administered three times per week for one month.Photographic sessions were conducted using a mobile phone. A Realme 7 Pro camera and CorelDRAW software were employed to analyze the craniovertebral angle (CVA). A pressure algometer was used to measure the pressure pain threshold (PPT), while a visual analogue scale (VAS) was utilized to assess pain severity. Additionally, a clinometer application on an Android device was used to evaluate cervical range of motion (ROM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in craniovertebral angle (CVA) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, with Group A showing a 16.12% improvement in CVA and a 75.61% reduction in VAS, compared to a 7.20% improvement in CVA and a 57.14% reduction in VAS in Group B.Group A also showed a significantly greater post-treatment increase in CVA (<i>p</i> = 0.01), cervical range of motion (ROM) for flexion (<i>p</i> = 0.002), extension (<i>p</i> = 0.005), right bending (<i>p</i> = 0.001), left bending (<i>p</i> = 0.001), right rotation (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and left rotation (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Additionally, Group A exhibited a significantly greater decrease in VAS (<i>p</i> = 0.003) compared to Group B following treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition (INI) technique, which combines ischemic compression, strain-counterstrain, and muscle energy techniques, yields superior outcomes compared to conventional therapy alone for individuals with forward head posture (FHP) and neck pain. It is particularly effective in improving craniovertebral angle (CVA), reducing pain levels, and enhancing cervical range of motion (ROM).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2476662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2476662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:前倾头位(FHP)和颈部疼痛是常见的肌肉骨骼疾病。本研究旨在评估综合神经肌肉抑制技术(INIT)对FHP和颈部疼痛患者的活动范围(ROM)和颅椎角(CVA)的影响。方法:共40例物理治疗参与者(女性26例,男性14例),年龄18 ~ 23岁(平均年龄:20±1.71岁)。随机分为两组:A组采用常规疗法联合针对斜方肌上部和枕下肌的综合神经肌肉抑制技术(INIT), B组采用常规疗法,仅包括强化和拉伸运动。治疗每周进行三次,持续一个月。使用移动电话进行摄影。采用Realme 7 Pro相机和CorelDRAW软件分析颅脑椎角(CVA)。采用压力计测量压力痛阈值(PPT),采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛严重程度。此外,在Android设备上使用一个测斜仪应用程序来评估颈椎活动范围(ROM)。结果:两组展示了显著改进craniovertebral角(CVA)和视觉模拟量表(血管)分数,A组显示16.12%的改善脑中风血管减少75.61%,比7.20%的改善脑中风血管减少57.14% B.Group还显示一组显著增加更大的治疗患者(p = 0.01),颈椎活动度(ROM)的弯曲(p = 0.002),扩展(p = 0.005),正确的弯曲(p = 0.001),左弯曲(p = 0.001),右旋转(p = 0.001)和左旋转(p = 0.001)。此外,治疗后A组VAS下降幅度明显大于B组(p = 0.003)。结论:综合神经肌肉抑制(INI)技术,结合了缺血性压迫、应变对抗和肌肉能量技术,与传统治疗相比,对于头向前姿势(FHP)和颈部疼痛的个体具有更好的效果。它在改善颅椎角(CVA)、减轻疼痛程度和增强颈椎活动度(ROM)方面特别有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on subjects with neck pain and forward head posture: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: Forward head posture (FHP) and neck pain are common musculoskeletal complaints. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique (INIT) on the range of motion (ROM) and craniovertebral angle (CVA) in individuals with FHP and neck pain.

Methods: A total of 40 physical therapy participants (26 females and 14 males), aged 18 to 23 years (mean age: 20 ± 1.71 years), participated in this study. They were randomized into two groups: Group A received conventional therapy combined with Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique (INIT) targeting the upper trapezius and suboccipital muscles, while Group B received conventional therapy consisting of strengthening and stretching exercises only. The treatment was administered three times per week for one month.Photographic sessions were conducted using a mobile phone. A Realme 7 Pro camera and CorelDRAW software were employed to analyze the craniovertebral angle (CVA). A pressure algometer was used to measure the pressure pain threshold (PPT), while a visual analogue scale (VAS) was utilized to assess pain severity. Additionally, a clinometer application on an Android device was used to evaluate cervical range of motion (ROM).

Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in craniovertebral angle (CVA) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, with Group A showing a 16.12% improvement in CVA and a 75.61% reduction in VAS, compared to a 7.20% improvement in CVA and a 57.14% reduction in VAS in Group B.Group A also showed a significantly greater post-treatment increase in CVA (p = 0.01), cervical range of motion (ROM) for flexion (p = 0.002), extension (p = 0.005), right bending (p = 0.001), left bending (p = 0.001), right rotation (p = 0.001), and left rotation (p = 0.001). Additionally, Group A exhibited a significantly greater decrease in VAS (p = 0.003) compared to Group B following treatment.

Conclusion: The Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition (INI) technique, which combines ischemic compression, strain-counterstrain, and muscle energy techniques, yields superior outcomes compared to conventional therapy alone for individuals with forward head posture (FHP) and neck pain. It is particularly effective in improving craniovertebral angle (CVA), reducing pain levels, and enhancing cervical range of motion (ROM).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信