比较创伤后应激障碍的认知加工疗法与延长暴露疗法的自杀率。

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jenna A Park, Daniel J Gottlieb, Bradley V Watts, Vincent Dufort, Jamie L Gradus, Brian Shiner
{"title":"比较创伤后应激障碍的认知加工疗法与延长暴露疗法的自杀率。","authors":"Jenna A Park, Daniel J Gottlieb, Bradley V Watts, Vincent Dufort, Jamie L Gradus, Brian Shiner","doi":"10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20240035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare suicide mortality rates for patients receiving two evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) protocols for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): cognitive processing therapy (CPT) and prolonged exposure (PE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Suicide mortality was measured among U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs patients with PTSD who received EBP from 2009 through 2019. Regional variation in delivering CPT versus PE was leveraged as an instrumental variable (IV) to compare suicide mortality by using standard adjustment and IV-based analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 62,686 patients received EBP for PTSD; 82.4% were male, and the mean±SD age was 46.9±14.4. Patients were followed for a median of 6 years, and there were 136 deaths by suicide (38.3 and 32.4 per 100,000 person-years among the CPT and PE groups, respectively). The regional rate of CPT versus PE delivery was a strong IV that had greater explanatory power for the type of EBP received than all patient factors combined. The standard adjustment model for CPT produced a hazard ratio of 1.25, whereas the reduced-form IV produced a hazard ratio of 1.22. The probit IV, in which relevant covariates were updated annually, produced an odds ratio of 0.99. The time-to-event IV produced a hazard ratio of 1.20. The differences were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No statistically significant difference was found between CPT and PE in the outcome of death by suicide. More effective interventions that result in higher remission rates would likely need to be developed to achieve a relative decrease in suicide risk through PTSD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46822,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY","volume":" ","pages":"appipsychotherapy20240035"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Suicide Rates for Cognitive Processing Therapy Versus Prolonged Exposure Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Jenna A Park, Daniel J Gottlieb, Bradley V Watts, Vincent Dufort, Jamie L Gradus, Brian Shiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20240035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare suicide mortality rates for patients receiving two evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) protocols for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): cognitive processing therapy (CPT) and prolonged exposure (PE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Suicide mortality was measured among U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs patients with PTSD who received EBP from 2009 through 2019. Regional variation in delivering CPT versus PE was leveraged as an instrumental variable (IV) to compare suicide mortality by using standard adjustment and IV-based analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 62,686 patients received EBP for PTSD; 82.4% were male, and the mean±SD age was 46.9±14.4. Patients were followed for a median of 6 years, and there were 136 deaths by suicide (38.3 and 32.4 per 100,000 person-years among the CPT and PE groups, respectively). The regional rate of CPT versus PE delivery was a strong IV that had greater explanatory power for the type of EBP received than all patient factors combined. The standard adjustment model for CPT produced a hazard ratio of 1.25, whereas the reduced-form IV produced a hazard ratio of 1.22. The probit IV, in which relevant covariates were updated annually, produced an odds ratio of 0.99. The time-to-event IV produced a hazard ratio of 1.20. The differences were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No statistically significant difference was found between CPT and PE in the outcome of death by suicide. More effective interventions that result in higher remission rates would likely need to be developed to achieve a relative decrease in suicide risk through PTSD treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"appipsychotherapy20240035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20240035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20240035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者接受认知加工治疗(CPT)和长时间暴露治疗(PE)两种循证心理治疗(EBP)方案的自杀死亡率。方法:测量2009年至2019年接受EBP治疗的美国退伍军人事务部PTSD患者的自杀死亡率。通过使用标准调整和基于标准调整的分析,将CPT和PE的区域差异作为工具变量(IV)来比较自杀死亡率。结果:62,686例PTSD患者接受了EBP治疗;82.4%为男性,平均±SD年龄为46.9±14.4岁。患者的随访时间中位数为6年,其中136人死于自杀(CPT组和PE组分别为38.3和32.4 / 100000人-年)。CPT与PE的区域输送率是一个强大的IV,比所有患者因素的总和更能解释所接受的EBP类型。CPT的标准调整模型产生的风险比为1.25,而简化形式IV产生的风险比为1.22。probit IV中相关协变量每年更新一次,其比值比为0.99。到事件IV的时间产生的风险比为1.20。差异不显著。结论:CPT与PE在自杀死亡结局上无统计学差异。可能需要开发更有效的干预措施,从而提高缓解率,从而通过创伤后应激障碍治疗实现自杀风险的相对降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Suicide Rates for Cognitive Processing Therapy Versus Prolonged Exposure Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Objective: This study aimed to compare suicide mortality rates for patients receiving two evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) protocols for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): cognitive processing therapy (CPT) and prolonged exposure (PE).

Methods: Suicide mortality was measured among U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs patients with PTSD who received EBP from 2009 through 2019. Regional variation in delivering CPT versus PE was leveraged as an instrumental variable (IV) to compare suicide mortality by using standard adjustment and IV-based analyses.

Results: In total, 62,686 patients received EBP for PTSD; 82.4% were male, and the mean±SD age was 46.9±14.4. Patients were followed for a median of 6 years, and there were 136 deaths by suicide (38.3 and 32.4 per 100,000 person-years among the CPT and PE groups, respectively). The regional rate of CPT versus PE delivery was a strong IV that had greater explanatory power for the type of EBP received than all patient factors combined. The standard adjustment model for CPT produced a hazard ratio of 1.25, whereas the reduced-form IV produced a hazard ratio of 1.22. The probit IV, in which relevant covariates were updated annually, produced an odds ratio of 0.99. The time-to-event IV produced a hazard ratio of 1.20. The differences were not significant.

Conclusions: No statistically significant difference was found between CPT and PE in the outcome of death by suicide. More effective interventions that result in higher remission rates would likely need to be developed to achieve a relative decrease in suicide risk through PTSD treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Founded in 1939, the American Journal of Psychotherapy (AJP) has long been a leader in the publication of eclectic articles for all psychotherapists. Transtheoretic in reach (offering information for psychotherapists across all theoretical foundations), the goal of AJP is to present an overview of the psychotherapies, subsuming a host of schools, techniques, and psychological modalities within the larger domain of clinical practice under broad themes including dynamic, behavioral, spiritual, and experiential.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信