在亚美尼亚实施无烟家庭的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Arevik Torosyan, Lilit Grigoryan, Varduhi Hayrumyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Palash Bhanot, Lillian Shaffer, Varduhi Petrosyan, Alexander Bazarchyan, Nour Alayan, Michelle C Kegler, Carla J Berg
{"title":"在亚美尼亚实施无烟家庭的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。","authors":"Arevik Torosyan, Lilit Grigoryan, Varduhi Hayrumyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Palash Bhanot, Lillian Shaffer, Varduhi Petrosyan, Alexander Bazarchyan, Nour Alayan, Michelle C Kegler, Carla J Berg","doi":"10.1177/17579759251318728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smoke-free homes (SFHs) reduce secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe), which is particularly crucial where smoking prevalence is high and public smoke-free policies are nascent, as in some low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study examined perspectives regarding SFHs, including barriers and facilitators, among adults in Armenia, a LMIC with high male smoking prevalence and recently-implemented smoke-free policies. In February-March 2024, focus groups were conducted with adults reporting smoking and non-smoking, separately, in two Armenian communities (<i>n</i> = 39; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 41.00, 46.2% female, 61.5% married, 74.4% children in household). Data were examined using thematic analysis. All participants reporting smoking (<i>n</i> = 18) were male, non-smoking participants (<i>n</i> = 21) were primarily (87.5%) female, 53.8% had no SFH restrictions and 12.8% partial. Commonly, smoking was allowed for certain people (e.g. guests) or rooms/spaces (e.g. kitchen, balcony). Common SFH motives were health of children and vulnerable adults (e.g. pregnant women). Salient challenges included high male smoking rates paired with hierarchical gender roles. When asked about strategies to promote SFHs, many suggested leveraging children by involving them in a SFH intervention or emphasizing SHSe's impact on children. While some suggested empowering women as change agents, others suggested targeting men. It is crucial that SFH interventions for Armenian households address Armenia's specific characteristics, such as high male smoking rates and more hierarchical social dynamics. Effective SFH interventions for Armenia may serve as models for other countries with similar characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":46805,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"17579759251318728"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitators and barriers to implementing smoke-free homes in Armenia: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Arevik Torosyan, Lilit Grigoryan, Varduhi Hayrumyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Palash Bhanot, Lillian Shaffer, Varduhi Petrosyan, Alexander Bazarchyan, Nour Alayan, Michelle C Kegler, Carla J Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17579759251318728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Smoke-free homes (SFHs) reduce secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe), which is particularly crucial where smoking prevalence is high and public smoke-free policies are nascent, as in some low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study examined perspectives regarding SFHs, including barriers and facilitators, among adults in Armenia, a LMIC with high male smoking prevalence and recently-implemented smoke-free policies. In February-March 2024, focus groups were conducted with adults reporting smoking and non-smoking, separately, in two Armenian communities (<i>n</i> = 39; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 41.00, 46.2% female, 61.5% married, 74.4% children in household). Data were examined using thematic analysis. All participants reporting smoking (<i>n</i> = 18) were male, non-smoking participants (<i>n</i> = 21) were primarily (87.5%) female, 53.8% had no SFH restrictions and 12.8% partial. Commonly, smoking was allowed for certain people (e.g. guests) or rooms/spaces (e.g. kitchen, balcony). Common SFH motives were health of children and vulnerable adults (e.g. pregnant women). Salient challenges included high male smoking rates paired with hierarchical gender roles. When asked about strategies to promote SFHs, many suggested leveraging children by involving them in a SFH intervention or emphasizing SHSe's impact on children. While some suggested empowering women as change agents, others suggested targeting men. It is crucial that SFH interventions for Armenian households address Armenia's specific characteristics, such as high male smoking rates and more hierarchical social dynamics. Effective SFH interventions for Armenia may serve as models for other countries with similar characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17579759251318728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759251318728\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759251318728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无烟家庭(SFHs)减少二手烟暴露(SHSe),这在吸烟率高且公共无烟政策刚刚起步的地方尤其重要,例如在一些低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。本研究调查了亚美尼亚成年人中SFHs的观点,包括障碍和促进因素,亚美尼亚是一个男性吸烟率很高的低收入和中等收入国家,最近实施了无烟政策。2024年2月至3月,在两个亚美尼亚社区分别对报告吸烟和不吸烟的成年人进行了焦点小组研究(n = 39;男性= 41.00,女性46.2%,已婚61.5%,家庭有子女74.4%)。使用专题分析对数据进行了审查。所有吸烟的参与者(n = 18)都是男性,不吸烟的参与者(n = 21)主要是女性(87.5%),53.8%没有SFH限制,12.8%部分。通常,某些人(如客人)或房间/空间(如厨房、阳台)是允许吸烟的。儿童健康和弱势成年人(如孕妇)的健康是SFH的常见动机。突出的挑战包括男性吸烟率高以及等级森严的性别角色。当被问及促进SFHs的策略时,许多人建议通过让儿童参与SFHs干预或强调sfse对儿童的影响来发挥儿童的作用。一些人建议赋予妇女权力,使其成为变革的推动者,另一些人则建议以男性为目标。至关重要的是,亚美尼亚家庭的SFH干预措施应解决亚美尼亚的具体特点,如男性吸烟率高和社会分层动态加剧。亚美尼亚有效的SFH干预措施可作为具有类似特点的其他国家的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facilitators and barriers to implementing smoke-free homes in Armenia: a qualitative study.

Smoke-free homes (SFHs) reduce secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe), which is particularly crucial where smoking prevalence is high and public smoke-free policies are nascent, as in some low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study examined perspectives regarding SFHs, including barriers and facilitators, among adults in Armenia, a LMIC with high male smoking prevalence and recently-implemented smoke-free policies. In February-March 2024, focus groups were conducted with adults reporting smoking and non-smoking, separately, in two Armenian communities (n = 39; Mage = 41.00, 46.2% female, 61.5% married, 74.4% children in household). Data were examined using thematic analysis. All participants reporting smoking (n = 18) were male, non-smoking participants (n = 21) were primarily (87.5%) female, 53.8% had no SFH restrictions and 12.8% partial. Commonly, smoking was allowed for certain people (e.g. guests) or rooms/spaces (e.g. kitchen, balcony). Common SFH motives were health of children and vulnerable adults (e.g. pregnant women). Salient challenges included high male smoking rates paired with hierarchical gender roles. When asked about strategies to promote SFHs, many suggested leveraging children by involving them in a SFH intervention or emphasizing SHSe's impact on children. While some suggested empowering women as change agents, others suggested targeting men. It is crucial that SFH interventions for Armenian households address Armenia's specific characteristics, such as high male smoking rates and more hierarchical social dynamics. Effective SFH interventions for Armenia may serve as models for other countries with similar characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Promotion
Global Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The journal aims to: ·publish academic content and commentaries of practical importance; ·provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination and exchange of health promotion, health education and public health theory, research findings, practice and reviews; ·publish articles which ensure wide geographical coverage and are of general interest to an international readership; ·provide fair, supportive, efficient and high quality peer review and editorial handling of all submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信