我们应该发展哪些系统反应来帮助外科医生处理他们的后悔经历?

Q2 Social Sciences
Ryan X Lam, Ruhi Thapar, Eric J Silberfein, Lorenzo R Deveza
{"title":"我们应该发展哪些系统反应来帮助外科医生处理他们的后悔经历?","authors":"Ryan X Lam, Ruhi Thapar, Eric J Silberfein, Lorenzo R Deveza","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regret in surgical practice is typically construed as resulting from the commission or the omission of a specific action at a specific decision point, which leads to a deleterious outcome. This article suggests a need to expand this conception of surgical regret to better account for surgeons' regret experiences arising from factors beyond their control. The commentary accompanying the case investigates these external sources of regret, such as resource limitations or professional interpersonal dynamics that prevent a desired outcome from being realized. It also discusses the normative value of addressing surgeons' experiences of regret, especially as a catalyst to facilitate positive systemic changes to ameliorate surgeons' kindred experiences of moral distress, burnout, and compassion fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"27 3","pages":"E178-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which Systemic Responses Should We Evolve to Help Surgeons Navigate Their Regret Experiences?\",\"authors\":\"Ryan X Lam, Ruhi Thapar, Eric J Silberfein, Lorenzo R Deveza\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/amajethics.2025.178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Regret in surgical practice is typically construed as resulting from the commission or the omission of a specific action at a specific decision point, which leads to a deleterious outcome. This article suggests a need to expand this conception of surgical regret to better account for surgeons' regret experiences arising from factors beyond their control. The commentary accompanying the case investigates these external sources of regret, such as resource limitations or professional interpersonal dynamics that prevent a desired outcome from being realized. It also discusses the normative value of addressing surgeons' experiences of regret, especially as a catalyst to facilitate positive systemic changes to ameliorate surgeons' kindred experiences of moral distress, burnout, and compassion fatigue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"E178-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在外科实践中,后悔通常被解释为由于在特定决策点上的特定行为的委托或遗漏而导致的有害结果。这篇文章建议有必要扩大手术后悔的概念,以更好地解释外科医生因无法控制的因素而产生的后悔经历。随附的评论调查了这些后悔的外部来源,如资源限制或专业人际关系动态,阻止了预期结果的实现。它还讨论了解决外科医生后悔经历的规范价值,特别是作为促进积极的系统变化的催化剂,以改善外科医生的道德痛苦,倦怠和同情疲劳的同类经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which Systemic Responses Should We Evolve to Help Surgeons Navigate Their Regret Experiences?

Regret in surgical practice is typically construed as resulting from the commission or the omission of a specific action at a specific decision point, which leads to a deleterious outcome. This article suggests a need to expand this conception of surgical regret to better account for surgeons' regret experiences arising from factors beyond their control. The commentary accompanying the case investigates these external sources of regret, such as resource limitations or professional interpersonal dynamics that prevent a desired outcome from being realized. It also discusses the normative value of addressing surgeons' experiences of regret, especially as a catalyst to facilitate positive systemic changes to ameliorate surgeons' kindred experiences of moral distress, burnout, and compassion fatigue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMA journal of ethics
AMA journal of ethics Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信