DSM分类饮食失调的诊断完整性:探索分类的替代方法和对遗传研究的影响。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Jessica Livney, Melissa Pehlivan, Nicholas G Martin, Sarah Maguire
{"title":"DSM分类饮食失调的诊断完整性:探索分类的替代方法和对遗传研究的影响。","authors":"Jessica Livney, Melissa Pehlivan, Nicholas G Martin, Sarah Maguire","doi":"10.1017/thg.2025.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research is only beginning to shape our understanding of eating disorders as metabolic-psychiatric illnesses. How eating disorders (EDs) are classified is essential to future research for understanding the etiology of these severe illnesses and both developing and tailoring effective treatments. The gold standard for classification for research and diagnostic purposes has primarily been and continues to be the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (DSM-5). With the reconceptualization of EDs comes new challenges of considering how EDs are classified to reflect clinical reality, prognosis and lived experience. In this article, we explore the DSM-5 method of categorical classification and how it may not accurately represent the fluidity in which EDs present themselves. We discuss alternative methods of conceptualizing EDs, and their relevance and implications for genetic research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23446,"journal":{"name":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Integrity of DSM Categorized Eating Disorders: Exploration of Alternative Methods of Classification and the Implications for Genetic Research.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Livney, Melissa Pehlivan, Nicholas G Martin, Sarah Maguire\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/thg.2025.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research is only beginning to shape our understanding of eating disorders as metabolic-psychiatric illnesses. How eating disorders (EDs) are classified is essential to future research for understanding the etiology of these severe illnesses and both developing and tailoring effective treatments. The gold standard for classification for research and diagnostic purposes has primarily been and continues to be the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (DSM-5). With the reconceptualization of EDs comes new challenges of considering how EDs are classified to reflect clinical reality, prognosis and lived experience. In this article, we explore the DSM-5 method of categorical classification and how it may not accurately represent the fluidity in which EDs present themselves. We discuss alternative methods of conceptualizing EDs, and their relevance and implications for genetic research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2025.3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2025.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究才刚刚开始塑造我们对饮食失调作为代谢精神疾病的理解。如何对饮食失调(EDs)进行分类对于了解这些严重疾病的病因以及开发和定制有效治疗方法的未来研究至关重要。用于研究和诊断目的的分类的黄金标准主要是并将继续是精神疾病诊断和统计手册(DSM-5)。随着急诊科概念的重新定义,急诊科的分类也面临着新的挑战,即如何反映临床现实、预后和生活经验。在这篇文章中,我们探讨了DSM-5的分类方法,以及它如何不能准确地代表ed呈现自己的流动性。我们讨论了概念化ed的替代方法,以及它们对遗传研究的相关性和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Integrity of DSM Categorized Eating Disorders: Exploration of Alternative Methods of Classification and the Implications for Genetic Research.

Research is only beginning to shape our understanding of eating disorders as metabolic-psychiatric illnesses. How eating disorders (EDs) are classified is essential to future research for understanding the etiology of these severe illnesses and both developing and tailoring effective treatments. The gold standard for classification for research and diagnostic purposes has primarily been and continues to be the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). With the reconceptualization of EDs comes new challenges of considering how EDs are classified to reflect clinical reality, prognosis and lived experience. In this article, we explore the DSM-5 method of categorical classification and how it may not accurately represent the fluidity in which EDs present themselves. We discuss alternative methods of conceptualizing EDs, and their relevance and implications for genetic research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Twin Research and Human Genetics
Twin Research and Human Genetics 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Twin Research and Human Genetics is the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics covers all areas of human genetics with an emphasis on twin studies, genetic epidemiology, psychiatric and behavioral genetics, and research on multiple births in the fields of epidemiology, genetics, endocrinology, fetal pathology, obstetrics and pediatrics. Through Twin Research and Human Genetics the society aims to publish the latest research developments in twin studies throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信