Jessica Livney, Melissa Pehlivan, Nicholas G Martin, Sarah Maguire
{"title":"DSM分类饮食失调的诊断完整性:探索分类的替代方法和对遗传研究的影响。","authors":"Jessica Livney, Melissa Pehlivan, Nicholas G Martin, Sarah Maguire","doi":"10.1017/thg.2025.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research is only beginning to shape our understanding of eating disorders as metabolic-psychiatric illnesses. How eating disorders (EDs) are classified is essential to future research for understanding the etiology of these severe illnesses and both developing and tailoring effective treatments. The gold standard for classification for research and diagnostic purposes has primarily been and continues to be the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (DSM-5). With the reconceptualization of EDs comes new challenges of considering how EDs are classified to reflect clinical reality, prognosis and lived experience. In this article, we explore the DSM-5 method of categorical classification and how it may not accurately represent the fluidity in which EDs present themselves. We discuss alternative methods of conceptualizing EDs, and their relevance and implications for genetic research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23446,"journal":{"name":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Integrity of DSM Categorized Eating Disorders: Exploration of Alternative Methods of Classification and the Implications for Genetic Research.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Livney, Melissa Pehlivan, Nicholas G Martin, Sarah Maguire\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/thg.2025.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research is only beginning to shape our understanding of eating disorders as metabolic-psychiatric illnesses. How eating disorders (EDs) are classified is essential to future research for understanding the etiology of these severe illnesses and both developing and tailoring effective treatments. The gold standard for classification for research and diagnostic purposes has primarily been and continues to be the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (DSM-5). With the reconceptualization of EDs comes new challenges of considering how EDs are classified to reflect clinical reality, prognosis and lived experience. In this article, we explore the DSM-5 method of categorical classification and how it may not accurately represent the fluidity in which EDs present themselves. We discuss alternative methods of conceptualizing EDs, and their relevance and implications for genetic research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2025.3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2025.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic Integrity of DSM Categorized Eating Disorders: Exploration of Alternative Methods of Classification and the Implications for Genetic Research.
Research is only beginning to shape our understanding of eating disorders as metabolic-psychiatric illnesses. How eating disorders (EDs) are classified is essential to future research for understanding the etiology of these severe illnesses and both developing and tailoring effective treatments. The gold standard for classification for research and diagnostic purposes has primarily been and continues to be the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). With the reconceptualization of EDs comes new challenges of considering how EDs are classified to reflect clinical reality, prognosis and lived experience. In this article, we explore the DSM-5 method of categorical classification and how it may not accurately represent the fluidity in which EDs present themselves. We discuss alternative methods of conceptualizing EDs, and their relevance and implications for genetic research.
期刊介绍:
Twin Research and Human Genetics is the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics covers all areas of human genetics with an emphasis on twin studies, genetic epidemiology, psychiatric and behavioral genetics, and research on multiple births in the fields of epidemiology, genetics, endocrinology, fetal pathology, obstetrics and pediatrics.
Through Twin Research and Human Genetics the society aims to publish the latest research developments in twin studies throughout the world.