人体分解和死亡后的时间:法医人类学中尸检间隔估计的持续挑战和未来方向。

IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Katherine E Weisensee, Madeline M Atwell
{"title":"人体分解和死亡后的时间:法医人类学中尸检间隔估计的持续挑战和未来方向。","authors":"Katherine E Weisensee, Madeline M Atwell","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Estimating the time since death, or the postmortem interval (PMI), is a significant component of forensic anthropological analysis when human remains are discovered. Despite decades of research, methods for providing an estimate of the PMI with known error rates are still absent from applied medicolegal forensic work, which prompts the necessity for a critical examination of the state of the field. This review details the history of how forensic anthropology emerged from the broader discipline of biological anthropology, with a specific focus on how forensic anthropologists came to be understood as suitable experts for estimating the PMI. We describe existing PMI estimation methods and enduring barriers in advancing our knowledge. We provide an overview of the formative PMI research, then focus on a systematic review of 30 years (1993-2023) of human decomposition literature. Results of our synthesis demonstrate the two prevailing ways to estimate the PMI involve (1) the use of quantitative biomarkers and (2) macromorphoscopic observations. Results also highlight that PMI research continues to be limited by small, highly variable samples and a lack of standardized definitions of decomposition, which impedes replicability and the advancement of methods for PMI estimation. Forensic anthropologists can address these longstanding issues by ensuring the principles of Open Science are adhered to during the research and dissemination process including data sharing and transparency. Intentional research design that integrates comprehensive geospatial data and improved modeling techniques can contribute to devising methods capable of providing PMI estimates within applied medicolegal and humanitarian contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":"186 Suppl 78 ","pages":"e70011"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Decomposition and Time Since Death: Persistent Challenges and Future Directions of Postmortem Interval Estimation in Forensic Anthropology.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine E Weisensee, Madeline M Atwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajpa.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Estimating the time since death, or the postmortem interval (PMI), is a significant component of forensic anthropological analysis when human remains are discovered. Despite decades of research, methods for providing an estimate of the PMI with known error rates are still absent from applied medicolegal forensic work, which prompts the necessity for a critical examination of the state of the field. This review details the history of how forensic anthropology emerged from the broader discipline of biological anthropology, with a specific focus on how forensic anthropologists came to be understood as suitable experts for estimating the PMI. We describe existing PMI estimation methods and enduring barriers in advancing our knowledge. We provide an overview of the formative PMI research, then focus on a systematic review of 30 years (1993-2023) of human decomposition literature. Results of our synthesis demonstrate the two prevailing ways to estimate the PMI involve (1) the use of quantitative biomarkers and (2) macromorphoscopic observations. Results also highlight that PMI research continues to be limited by small, highly variable samples and a lack of standardized definitions of decomposition, which impedes replicability and the advancement of methods for PMI estimation. Forensic anthropologists can address these longstanding issues by ensuring the principles of Open Science are adhered to during the research and dissemination process including data sharing and transparency. Intentional research design that integrates comprehensive geospatial data and improved modeling techniques can contribute to devising methods capable of providing PMI estimates within applied medicolegal and humanitarian contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Biological Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"186 Suppl 78 \",\"pages\":\"e70011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898555/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Biological Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.70011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.70011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

估计死亡后的时间,或尸检间隔(PMI),是法医人类学分析的一个重要组成部分,当发现人类遗骸。尽管经过了几十年的研究,在应用法医工作中仍然缺乏提供具有已知错误率的PMI估计的方法,这提示了对该领域状况进行批判性检查的必要性。这篇综述详细介绍了法医人类学如何从更广泛的生物人类学学科中脱颖而出的历史,特别关注了法医人类学家如何被理解为评估PMI的合适专家。我们描述了现有的PMI估计方法和持久的障碍,在推进我们的知识。本文首先概述了形成性PMI研究,然后着重对30年来(1993-2023)关于人体分解的文献进行了系统回顾。我们的合成结果表明,估计PMI的两种主要方法包括:(1)使用定量生物标志物和(2)宏观形态学观察。结果还强调,PMI研究仍然受到小样本、高度可变的样本和缺乏标准化分解定义的限制,这阻碍了PMI估计方法的可复制性和进步。法医人类学家可以通过确保在研究和传播过程中遵守开放科学的原则,包括数据共享和透明度,来解决这些长期存在的问题。整合全面地理空间数据和改进建模技术的有意研究设计有助于设计能够在应用医学和人道主义背景下提供PMI估计的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Decomposition and Time Since Death: Persistent Challenges and Future Directions of Postmortem Interval Estimation in Forensic Anthropology.

Estimating the time since death, or the postmortem interval (PMI), is a significant component of forensic anthropological analysis when human remains are discovered. Despite decades of research, methods for providing an estimate of the PMI with known error rates are still absent from applied medicolegal forensic work, which prompts the necessity for a critical examination of the state of the field. This review details the history of how forensic anthropology emerged from the broader discipline of biological anthropology, with a specific focus on how forensic anthropologists came to be understood as suitable experts for estimating the PMI. We describe existing PMI estimation methods and enduring barriers in advancing our knowledge. We provide an overview of the formative PMI research, then focus on a systematic review of 30 years (1993-2023) of human decomposition literature. Results of our synthesis demonstrate the two prevailing ways to estimate the PMI involve (1) the use of quantitative biomarkers and (2) macromorphoscopic observations. Results also highlight that PMI research continues to be limited by small, highly variable samples and a lack of standardized definitions of decomposition, which impedes replicability and the advancement of methods for PMI estimation. Forensic anthropologists can address these longstanding issues by ensuring the principles of Open Science are adhered to during the research and dissemination process including data sharing and transparency. Intentional research design that integrates comprehensive geospatial data and improved modeling techniques can contribute to devising methods capable of providing PMI estimates within applied medicolegal and humanitarian contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信