{"title":"异种移植手术应该在美国食品和药物管理局的扩大准入途径下被批准吗?","authors":"Christopher Bobier, Daniel J Hurst, Daniel Rodger","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines use of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) expanded access pathway to permit cardiac xenotransplants. This article first argues that, although data are collected from cardiac xenotransplant surgeries authorized through the FDA's expanded access pathway, uses of preclinical trial data do not align with the FDA's stated aims of expanded access. This article also argues that potential risks of xenotransplantation merit greater caution than risks posed by devices and that it is unclear how caution about such risks is regarded and operationalized during the FDA's expanded access authorization processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"27 3","pages":"E197-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should Xenotransplantation Surgeries Be Authorized Under the Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access Pathway?\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Bobier, Daniel J Hurst, Daniel Rodger\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/amajethics.2025.197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article examines use of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) expanded access pathway to permit cardiac xenotransplants. This article first argues that, although data are collected from cardiac xenotransplant surgeries authorized through the FDA's expanded access pathway, uses of preclinical trial data do not align with the FDA's stated aims of expanded access. This article also argues that potential risks of xenotransplantation merit greater caution than risks posed by devices and that it is unclear how caution about such risks is regarded and operationalized during the FDA's expanded access authorization processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"E197-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Should Xenotransplantation Surgeries Be Authorized Under the Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access Pathway?
This article examines use of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) expanded access pathway to permit cardiac xenotransplants. This article first argues that, although data are collected from cardiac xenotransplant surgeries authorized through the FDA's expanded access pathway, uses of preclinical trial data do not align with the FDA's stated aims of expanded access. This article also argues that potential risks of xenotransplantation merit greater caution than risks posed by devices and that it is unclear how caution about such risks is regarded and operationalized during the FDA's expanded access authorization processes.
期刊介绍:
The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.