在不是由于错误导致的不良结果的情况下,与患者共同决策的使用如何减轻外科医生的遗憾?

Q2 Social Sciences
Josh Sommovilla
{"title":"在不是由于错误导致的不良结果的情况下,与患者共同决策的使用如何减轻外科医生的遗憾?","authors":"Josh Sommovilla","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgeons might experience regret after interventions for high-risk patients who have poor outcomes, even when no errors occurred. Some regret experiences stem from incomplete communications or miscommunications about options, expectations, or prognoses. Experiences of regret, and even moral distress, might be mitigated when surgeons share key surgical care decisions with patients or their surrogates and draw on strategies for communicating well about patients' serious illnesses or injuries. Shared decision-making is a communication framework whose principles may contribute to mitigation of surgeon regret.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"27 3","pages":"E201-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Might the Use of Shared Decision-Making With a Patient Mitigate Surgeon Regret in Circumstances of a Poor Outcome Not Due to Error?\",\"authors\":\"Josh Sommovilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/amajethics.2025.201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Surgeons might experience regret after interventions for high-risk patients who have poor outcomes, even when no errors occurred. Some regret experiences stem from incomplete communications or miscommunications about options, expectations, or prognoses. Experiences of regret, and even moral distress, might be mitigated when surgeons share key surgical care decisions with patients or their surrogates and draw on strategies for communicating well about patients' serious illnesses or injuries. Shared decision-making is a communication framework whose principles may contribute to mitigation of surgeon regret.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"E201-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

外科医生可能会在对高风险患者进行干预后感到后悔,即使这些患者没有发生错误,但结果却很糟糕。一些遗憾的经历源于对选择、期望或预测的不完整沟通或沟通不畅。当外科医生与病人或他们的代理人分享关键的手术护理决定,并采取策略就病人的严重疾病或受伤进行良好的沟通时,可能会减轻后悔的经历,甚至道德上的痛苦。共同决策是一种沟通框架,其原则可能有助于减轻外科医生的后悔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Might the Use of Shared Decision-Making With a Patient Mitigate Surgeon Regret in Circumstances of a Poor Outcome Not Due to Error?

Surgeons might experience regret after interventions for high-risk patients who have poor outcomes, even when no errors occurred. Some regret experiences stem from incomplete communications or miscommunications about options, expectations, or prognoses. Experiences of regret, and even moral distress, might be mitigated when surgeons share key surgical care decisions with patients or their surrogates and draw on strategies for communicating well about patients' serious illnesses or injuries. Shared decision-making is a communication framework whose principles may contribute to mitigation of surgeon regret.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMA journal of ethics
AMA journal of ethics Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信