{"title":"在不是由于错误导致的不良结果的情况下,与患者共同决策的使用如何减轻外科医生的遗憾?","authors":"Josh Sommovilla","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgeons might experience regret after interventions for high-risk patients who have poor outcomes, even when no errors occurred. Some regret experiences stem from incomplete communications or miscommunications about options, expectations, or prognoses. Experiences of regret, and even moral distress, might be mitigated when surgeons share key surgical care decisions with patients or their surrogates and draw on strategies for communicating well about patients' serious illnesses or injuries. Shared decision-making is a communication framework whose principles may contribute to mitigation of surgeon regret.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"27 3","pages":"E201-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Might the Use of Shared Decision-Making With a Patient Mitigate Surgeon Regret in Circumstances of a Poor Outcome Not Due to Error?\",\"authors\":\"Josh Sommovilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/amajethics.2025.201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Surgeons might experience regret after interventions for high-risk patients who have poor outcomes, even when no errors occurred. Some regret experiences stem from incomplete communications or miscommunications about options, expectations, or prognoses. Experiences of regret, and even moral distress, might be mitigated when surgeons share key surgical care decisions with patients or their surrogates and draw on strategies for communicating well about patients' serious illnesses or injuries. Shared decision-making is a communication framework whose principles may contribute to mitigation of surgeon regret.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"E201-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Might the Use of Shared Decision-Making With a Patient Mitigate Surgeon Regret in Circumstances of a Poor Outcome Not Due to Error?
Surgeons might experience regret after interventions for high-risk patients who have poor outcomes, even when no errors occurred. Some regret experiences stem from incomplete communications or miscommunications about options, expectations, or prognoses. Experiences of regret, and even moral distress, might be mitigated when surgeons share key surgical care decisions with patients or their surrogates and draw on strategies for communicating well about patients' serious illnesses or injuries. Shared decision-making is a communication framework whose principles may contribute to mitigation of surgeon regret.
期刊介绍:
The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.