机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术中的体内与体外新膀胱:来自单一机构经验的围手术期、肿瘤学和功能结果。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Bing Yan, Yuan Liu, Yang Liu, Ji Zheng, Peng He, Xuemei Li, Yuwei Li, Yuting Liu, Xiaozhou Zhou, Zhiwen Chen
{"title":"机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术中的体内与体外新膀胱:来自单一机构经验的围手术期、肿瘤学和功能结果。","authors":"Bing Yan, Yuan Liu, Yang Liu, Ji Zheng, Peng He, Xuemei Li, Yuwei Li, Yuting Liu, Xiaozhou Zhou, Zhiwen Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05538-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of the intracorporeal neobladder (ICNB) and extracorporeal neobladder (ECNB) technique following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed our single-institutional, prospectively collected database for consecutive patients who underwent RARC with an ileum neobladder from July 2016 to February 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the approach of reconstruction (ICNB or ECNB). The chi-squared test and Wilcoxon test were used to summarize categorical and continuous variables, respectively. survival and complication outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, multivariate logistic regression and Cox hazards models.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Among 304 patients, 190 ICNB patients and 114 ECNB patients were identified. A shorter median operative time (320 vs. 354 min; p = 0.001) and less median EBL (300 vs. 500 ml; p < 0.001) were recorded in the ICNB group. A significant difference in 90-d overall complications was detected between the 2 groups (49.5% vs. 61.4%; p = 0.043). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age, relapsed tumor and surgical approach (ECNB/ICNB) were individual predictive factors for 90-d overall complications. The functional outcomes and survival rates were comparable between the ICNB and ECNB groups. A Cox proportional hazards model indicated that higher pathological stage and pN status are predictors of both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with ECNB, ICNB significantly improves perioperative outcomes without compromising functional or oncological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal neobladder in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes from a single-institutional experience.\",\"authors\":\"Bing Yan, Yuan Liu, Yang Liu, Ji Zheng, Peng He, Xuemei Li, Yuwei Li, Yuting Liu, Xiaozhou Zhou, Zhiwen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-025-05538-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of the intracorporeal neobladder (ICNB) and extracorporeal neobladder (ECNB) technique following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed our single-institutional, prospectively collected database for consecutive patients who underwent RARC with an ileum neobladder from July 2016 to February 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the approach of reconstruction (ICNB or ECNB). The chi-squared test and Wilcoxon test were used to summarize categorical and continuous variables, respectively. survival and complication outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, multivariate logistic regression and Cox hazards models.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Among 304 patients, 190 ICNB patients and 114 ECNB patients were identified. A shorter median operative time (320 vs. 354 min; p = 0.001) and less median EBL (300 vs. 500 ml; p < 0.001) were recorded in the ICNB group. A significant difference in 90-d overall complications was detected between the 2 groups (49.5% vs. 61.4%; p = 0.043). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age, relapsed tumor and surgical approach (ECNB/ICNB) were individual predictive factors for 90-d overall complications. The functional outcomes and survival rates were comparable between the ICNB and ECNB groups. A Cox proportional hazards model indicated that higher pathological stage and pN status are predictors of both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with ECNB, ICNB significantly improves perioperative outcomes without compromising functional or oncological outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05538-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05538-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)后体内新膀胱(ICNB)和体外新膀胱(ECNB)技术的围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结果。方法:我们回顾了2016年7月至2023年2月期间连续接受RARC的回肠新膀胱患者的单一机构前瞻性数据库。根据重建入路将患者分为两组(ICNB或ECNB)。分类变量和连续变量分别采用卡方检验和Wilcoxon检验。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线、多变量logistic回归和Cox风险模型分析生存率和并发症结局。结果:304例患者中,ICNB患者190例,ECNB患者114例。中位手术时间较短(320 vs. 354 min;p = 0.001)和更少的中位EBL (300 vs 500 ml;p < 0.001)。两组患者90 d总并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(49.5% vs 61.4%;p = 0.043)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄、肿瘤复发和手术入路(ECNB/ICNB)是90 d总并发症的个体预测因素。ICNB组和ECNB组的功能结局和生存率具有可比性。Cox比例风险模型显示,较高的病理分期和pN状态是无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)的预测因子。结论:与ECNB相比,ICNB在不影响功能或肿瘤预后的情况下显著改善围手术期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal neobladder in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes from a single-institutional experience.

Purpose: To compare the perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of the intracorporeal neobladder (ICNB) and extracorporeal neobladder (ECNB) technique following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).

Methods: We reviewed our single-institutional, prospectively collected database for consecutive patients who underwent RARC with an ileum neobladder from July 2016 to February 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the approach of reconstruction (ICNB or ECNB). The chi-squared test and Wilcoxon test were used to summarize categorical and continuous variables, respectively. survival and complication outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, multivariate logistic regression and Cox hazards models.

Result: Among 304 patients, 190 ICNB patients and 114 ECNB patients were identified. A shorter median operative time (320 vs. 354 min; p = 0.001) and less median EBL (300 vs. 500 ml; p < 0.001) were recorded in the ICNB group. A significant difference in 90-d overall complications was detected between the 2 groups (49.5% vs. 61.4%; p = 0.043). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age, relapsed tumor and surgical approach (ECNB/ICNB) were individual predictive factors for 90-d overall complications. The functional outcomes and survival rates were comparable between the ICNB and ECNB groups. A Cox proportional hazards model indicated that higher pathological stage and pN status are predictors of both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Conclusion: Compared with ECNB, ICNB significantly improves perioperative outcomes without compromising functional or oncological outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信