营养补充剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者营养不良和肌肉减少症的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hong-Yan Zheng, Hao-Yu Zhang, Kuang-Hao Wu, Wen-Jie Cai, Zhou-Zhou Li, Xin-Yu Song
{"title":"营养补充剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者营养不良和肌肉减少症的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案","authors":"Hong-Yan Zheng, Hao-Yu Zhang, Kuang-Hao Wu, Wen-Jie Cai, Zhou-Zhou Li, Xin-Yu Song","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02801-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COPD patients suffering from malnutrition or sarcopenia often incur higher healthcare costs and experience adverse clinical outcomes. Despite this, the effectiveness of nutrient supplements in this population remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Two reviewers will independently search seven databases-PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and the Cochrane Library-for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before August 31, 2024. These RCTs should compare the effects of nutrient supplements against either a standard diet or placebo supplements in patients with COPD. The risk of bias in the included studies will be evaluated using the modified Jadad scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Data synthesis will be conducted using RevMan software. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) will be applied to the primary outcomes. Additionally, subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to assess the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval is not required because this study is a secondary analysis of existing data. We will disseminate the findings through peer- reviewed publications.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>CRD42024585694.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations of this study: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a thorough assessment of the efficacy of nutrient supplements in COPD patients, covering a wide range of studies. ·The use of the modified Jadad scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool ensures a robust evaluation of study quality. Additionally, trial sequential analysis and subgroup analyses are employed to enhance the robustness of the findings. ·The credibility of the evidence may be compromised due to the potential for uncertain study quality and limited sample sizes in some included trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of nutrient supplements in managing malnutrition and sarcopenia in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hong-Yan Zheng, Hao-Yu Zhang, Kuang-Hao Wu, Wen-Jie Cai, Zhou-Zhou Li, Xin-Yu Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02801-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COPD patients suffering from malnutrition or sarcopenia often incur higher healthcare costs and experience adverse clinical outcomes. Despite this, the effectiveness of nutrient supplements in this population remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Two reviewers will independently search seven databases-PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and the Cochrane Library-for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before August 31, 2024. These RCTs should compare the effects of nutrient supplements against either a standard diet or placebo supplements in patients with COPD. The risk of bias in the included studies will be evaluated using the modified Jadad scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Data synthesis will be conducted using RevMan software. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) will be applied to the primary outcomes. Additionally, subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to assess the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval is not required because this study is a secondary analysis of existing data. We will disseminate the findings through peer- reviewed publications.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>CRD42024585694.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations of this study: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a thorough assessment of the efficacy of nutrient supplements in COPD patients, covering a wide range of studies. ·The use of the modified Jadad scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool ensures a robust evaluation of study quality. Additionally, trial sequential analysis and subgroup analyses are employed to enhance the robustness of the findings. ·The credibility of the evidence may be compromised due to the potential for uncertain study quality and limited sample sizes in some included trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895150/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02801-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02801-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有营养不良或肌肉减少症的慢性阻塞性肺病患者往往需要更高的医疗费用并经历不良的临床结果。尽管如此,营养补充剂在这一人群中的有效性仍不确定。方法与分析:两名审稿人将独立检索pubmed、Embase、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施、万方、中国生物医学文献数据库和Cochrane图书馆7个数据库,检索2024年8月31日前发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)。这些随机对照试验应该比较营养补充剂与标准饮食或安慰剂补充剂对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的影响。纳入研究的偏倚风险将使用改良的Jadad量表和Cochrane协作的偏倚风险工具进行评估。数据综合将使用RevMan软件进行。试验序列分析(TSA)将应用于主要结果。此外,将进行亚组分析和敏感性分析,以评估研究结果的稳健性。伦理和传播:由于本研究是对现有数据的二次分析,因此不需要伦理批准。我们将通过同行评议的出版物传播研究结果。系统评价注册:CRD42024585694。本研究的优势和局限性:本系统综述和荟萃分析提供了营养补充剂对COPD患者疗效的全面评估,涵盖了广泛的研究。·使用改良的Jadad量表和Cochrane协作的偏倚风险工具,确保对研究质量进行可靠的评估。此外,采用试验序列分析和亚组分析来增强研究结果的稳健性。·证据的可信度可能会因某些纳入试验的研究质量不确定和样本量有限而受到损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of nutrient supplements in managing malnutrition and sarcopenia in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: COPD patients suffering from malnutrition or sarcopenia often incur higher healthcare costs and experience adverse clinical outcomes. Despite this, the effectiveness of nutrient supplements in this population remains uncertain.

Methods and analysis: Two reviewers will independently search seven databases-PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and the Cochrane Library-for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before August 31, 2024. These RCTs should compare the effects of nutrient supplements against either a standard diet or placebo supplements in patients with COPD. The risk of bias in the included studies will be evaluated using the modified Jadad scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Data synthesis will be conducted using RevMan software. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) will be applied to the primary outcomes. Additionally, subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to assess the robustness of the findings.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required because this study is a secondary analysis of existing data. We will disseminate the findings through peer- reviewed publications.

Systematic review registration: CRD42024585694.

Strengths and limitations of this study: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a thorough assessment of the efficacy of nutrient supplements in COPD patients, covering a wide range of studies. ·The use of the modified Jadad scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool ensures a robust evaluation of study quality. Additionally, trial sequential analysis and subgroup analyses are employed to enhance the robustness of the findings. ·The credibility of the evidence may be compromised due to the potential for uncertain study quality and limited sample sizes in some included trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信