胸膜间皮瘤患者接受一线化疗的预后因素:建立PLECH基线风险评分。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1159/000543637
Alberto Guijosa, Luis Antonio Cabrera-Miranda, Ana Pamela Gómez-García, Rogelio Trejo Rosales, Wendy Muñoz-Montaño, Diana Flores, Nancy Reynoso-Noverón, Oscar Arrieta
{"title":"胸膜间皮瘤患者接受一线化疗的预后因素:建立PLECH基线风险评分。","authors":"Alberto Guijosa, Luis Antonio Cabrera-Miranda, Ana Pamela Gómez-García, Rogelio Trejo Rosales, Wendy Muñoz-Montaño, Diana Flores, Nancy Reynoso-Noverón, Oscar Arrieta","doi":"10.1159/000543637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pleural Mesothelioma (PM) is a rare and aggressive cancer where prognostic assessment is crucial. Traditional prognostic scores such as the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Cancer and Leukaemia Group B (CALGB) have limitations, particularly in reflecting contemporary treatments and demographic diversities, while more recent scores often include novel biomarkers, not widely available and validated. Our goal is to create an effective prognostic score for PM using readily available baseline data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study at two Mexican cancer centers included patients with unresectable PM treated with first-line chemotherapy from 2010 to 2023. Baseline variables' associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Prognostic variables from univariate and multivariate analyses formed a baseline risk score. The score's OS prediction was compared to standard CALGB and EORTC scores using ROC curves and Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 262 patients (69.1% male, 80.5% epithelioid histology), we developed a 0-7 point PLECH score based on five variables: Platelet count (P: +2), high LDH (L: +1), ECOG ≥ 2 (E: +1), Chest pain at diagnosis (C: +2), and non-epithelioid Histology (H: +1). The score had an AUC of 0.70 for predicting 1-year OS, outperforming CALGB (0.60) and EORTC (0.57) scores, with an optimal cut-off of 2.5 (sensitivity 75%, specificity 55%). High scores (≥3) indicated worse OS (12.3 vs. 20.1 months; p<0.001) and PFS (6.4 vs. 11.3 months; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PLECH score, developed from a substantial Latin-American cohort, is a simple and effective prognostic tool for PM patients, outperforming traditional scores. It identifies a high-risk group potentially better suited to alternative treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Factors in Pleural Mesothelioma Patients Receiving First-Line Chemotherapy: Establishing the PLECH Baseline Risk Score.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Guijosa, Luis Antonio Cabrera-Miranda, Ana Pamela Gómez-García, Rogelio Trejo Rosales, Wendy Muñoz-Montaño, Diana Flores, Nancy Reynoso-Noverón, Oscar Arrieta\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pleural Mesothelioma (PM) is a rare and aggressive cancer where prognostic assessment is crucial. Traditional prognostic scores such as the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Cancer and Leukaemia Group B (CALGB) have limitations, particularly in reflecting contemporary treatments and demographic diversities, while more recent scores often include novel biomarkers, not widely available and validated. Our goal is to create an effective prognostic score for PM using readily available baseline data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study at two Mexican cancer centers included patients with unresectable PM treated with first-line chemotherapy from 2010 to 2023. Baseline variables' associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Prognostic variables from univariate and multivariate analyses formed a baseline risk score. The score's OS prediction was compared to standard CALGB and EORTC scores using ROC curves and Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 262 patients (69.1% male, 80.5% epithelioid histology), we developed a 0-7 point PLECH score based on five variables: Platelet count (P: +2), high LDH (L: +1), ECOG ≥ 2 (E: +1), Chest pain at diagnosis (C: +2), and non-epithelioid Histology (H: +1). The score had an AUC of 0.70 for predicting 1-year OS, outperforming CALGB (0.60) and EORTC (0.57) scores, with an optimal cut-off of 2.5 (sensitivity 75%, specificity 55%). High scores (≥3) indicated worse OS (12.3 vs. 20.1 months; p<0.001) and PFS (6.4 vs. 11.3 months; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PLECH score, developed from a substantial Latin-American cohort, is a simple and effective prognostic tool for PM patients, outperforming traditional scores. It identifies a high-risk group potentially better suited to alternative treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543637\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:胸膜间皮瘤(PM)是一种罕见的侵袭性癌症,其预后评估至关重要。传统的预后评分,如欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)和癌症和白血病B组(CALGB)有局限性,特别是在反映当代治疗和人口多样性方面,而较新的评分通常包括新的生物标志物,不广泛使用和验证。我们的目标是使用现成的基线数据为PM创建一个有效的预后评分。方法:在两家墨西哥癌症中心进行回顾性队列研究,纳入了2010年至2023年接受一线化疗的不可切除PM患者。分析了基线变量与总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的关联。单变量和多变量分析的预后变量形成基线风险评分。使用ROC曲线和Kaplan-Meier分析将评分的OS预测与标准CALGB和EORTC评分进行比较。结果:在262例患者中(69.1%为男性,80.5%为上皮样组织学),我们根据血小板计数(P: +2)、高LDH (L: +1)、ECOG≥2 (E: +1)、诊断时胸痛(C: +2)和非上皮样组织学(H: +1)这五个变量制定了0-7分PLECH评分。该评分预测1年OS的AUC为0.70,优于CALGB(0.60)和EORTC(0.57)评分,最佳临界值为2.5(敏感性75%,特异性55%)。得分高(≥3)表示OS较差(12.3个月vs. 20.1个月;结论:PLECH评分从大量拉丁美洲队列中发展而来,是PM患者简单有效的预后工具,优于传统评分。它确定了一个可能更适合替代治疗的高风险群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Factors in Pleural Mesothelioma Patients Receiving First-Line Chemotherapy: Establishing the PLECH Baseline Risk Score.

Introduction: Pleural Mesothelioma (PM) is a rare and aggressive cancer where prognostic assessment is crucial. Traditional prognostic scores such as the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Cancer and Leukaemia Group B (CALGB) have limitations, particularly in reflecting contemporary treatments and demographic diversities, while more recent scores often include novel biomarkers, not widely available and validated. Our goal is to create an effective prognostic score for PM using readily available baseline data.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study at two Mexican cancer centers included patients with unresectable PM treated with first-line chemotherapy from 2010 to 2023. Baseline variables' associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Prognostic variables from univariate and multivariate analyses formed a baseline risk score. The score's OS prediction was compared to standard CALGB and EORTC scores using ROC curves and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: Among 262 patients (69.1% male, 80.5% epithelioid histology), we developed a 0-7 point PLECH score based on five variables: Platelet count (P: +2), high LDH (L: +1), ECOG ≥ 2 (E: +1), Chest pain at diagnosis (C: +2), and non-epithelioid Histology (H: +1). The score had an AUC of 0.70 for predicting 1-year OS, outperforming CALGB (0.60) and EORTC (0.57) scores, with an optimal cut-off of 2.5 (sensitivity 75%, specificity 55%). High scores (≥3) indicated worse OS (12.3 vs. 20.1 months; p<0.001) and PFS (6.4 vs. 11.3 months; p<0.001).

Conclusion: The PLECH score, developed from a substantial Latin-American cohort, is a simple and effective prognostic tool for PM patients, outperforming traditional scores. It identifies a high-risk group potentially better suited to alternative treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信