推进珍珠谷子产量预测:印度拉贾斯坦邦个体和集成机器学习方法的比较分析。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-03-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0317602
Ahmad Alsaber, Parul Setiya, Anurag Satpathi, Abrar Aljamaan, Jiazhu Pan
{"title":"推进珍珠谷子产量预测:印度拉贾斯坦邦个体和集成机器学习方法的比较分析。","authors":"Ahmad Alsaber, Parul Setiya, Anurag Satpathi, Abrar Aljamaan, Jiazhu Pan","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0317602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) is a resilient crop known for its ability to thrive in arid and semi-arid regions, making it a crucial staple in regions prone to drought. Rajasthan, a state in India, emerged as the top producer of pearl millet. This study enhances yield forecasting for pearl millet using machine learning models across nine districts viz. Jaipur, Ajmer, Jodhpur, Bikaner, Bharatpur, Alwar, Sikar, Jhunjhunu and Nagaur in Rajasthan, India. Data from 1997-2019 (23 years), including yield data from the Directorate of Economics and Statistics and weather data from the NASA POWER web portal, were analysed. The study employed individual machine learning methods (GLM, ELNET, XGB, SVR and RF) and their ensemble combinations (GLM, ELNET, Cubist and RF). Discerning the overall best performing model across all locations remained challenging. For instance, while ensemble models exhibited subpar performance in Barmer and Nagaur, their performance ranged from satisfactory to commendable in other locations. To identify the best model, all models were ranked based on their R2 and nRMSE (%) values. Combined average ranks during training and testing revealed the model performance ranking as I-XGB (3.83) >  I-GLM (4.28) >  E-ELNET (4.32) >  I-RF (4.67) >  E-GLM (4.88) >  I-SVR (4.90) >  I-ELNET (4.94) >  E-RF (6.03) >  E-Cubist (7.15), where I denotes individual model, while E denotes ensemble model. Intriguingly, while individual GLM and XGB models demonstrated superior performance during calibration, they exhibited poorer performance during validation, potentially indicating issues of data overfitting. Hence, the ensemble ELNET approach is recommended for accurate prediction of pearl millet yield, followed by the individual RF model. These performances underscore the importance of tailored model selection based on specific geographic and environmental conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 3","pages":"e0317602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11896074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing pearl millet yield forecasting: Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble machine learning approaches over Rajasthan, India.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Alsaber, Parul Setiya, Anurag Satpathi, Abrar Aljamaan, Jiazhu Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0317602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) is a resilient crop known for its ability to thrive in arid and semi-arid regions, making it a crucial staple in regions prone to drought. Rajasthan, a state in India, emerged as the top producer of pearl millet. This study enhances yield forecasting for pearl millet using machine learning models across nine districts viz. Jaipur, Ajmer, Jodhpur, Bikaner, Bharatpur, Alwar, Sikar, Jhunjhunu and Nagaur in Rajasthan, India. Data from 1997-2019 (23 years), including yield data from the Directorate of Economics and Statistics and weather data from the NASA POWER web portal, were analysed. The study employed individual machine learning methods (GLM, ELNET, XGB, SVR and RF) and their ensemble combinations (GLM, ELNET, Cubist and RF). Discerning the overall best performing model across all locations remained challenging. For instance, while ensemble models exhibited subpar performance in Barmer and Nagaur, their performance ranged from satisfactory to commendable in other locations. To identify the best model, all models were ranked based on their R2 and nRMSE (%) values. Combined average ranks during training and testing revealed the model performance ranking as I-XGB (3.83) >  I-GLM (4.28) >  E-ELNET (4.32) >  I-RF (4.67) >  E-GLM (4.88) >  I-SVR (4.90) >  I-ELNET (4.94) >  E-RF (6.03) >  E-Cubist (7.15), where I denotes individual model, while E denotes ensemble model. Intriguingly, while individual GLM and XGB models demonstrated superior performance during calibration, they exhibited poorer performance during validation, potentially indicating issues of data overfitting. Hence, the ensemble ELNET approach is recommended for accurate prediction of pearl millet yield, followed by the individual RF model. These performances underscore the importance of tailored model selection based on specific geographic and environmental conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"e0317602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11896074/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317602\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

珍珠粟(Pennisetum glaucum L.)是一种适应性强的作物,以其在干旱和半干旱地区茁壮成长的能力而闻名,使其成为干旱易发地区的重要主食。印度的拉贾斯坦邦成为珍珠粟的最大产地。本研究利用机器学习模型增强了印度拉贾斯坦邦斋浦尔、阿杰梅尔、焦特布尔、比卡内尔、巴拉特普尔、阿尔瓦尔、西卡尔、Jhunjhunu和那戈尔等9个地区珍珠小米的产量预测。分析了1997年至2019年(23年)的数据,包括经济与统计局的产量数据和NASA POWER门户网站的天气数据。本研究采用了单独的机器学习方法(GLM、ELNET、XGB、SVR和RF)及其集成组合(GLM、ELNET、Cubist和RF)。在所有地区辨别整体表现最佳的模式仍然具有挑战性。例如,虽然集合模型在Barmer和Nagaur表现不佳,但它们在其他地方的表现从令人满意到值得赞扬。为了确定最佳模型,根据R2和nRMSE(%)值对所有模型进行排序。训练和测试期间的综合平均排名显示,模型性能排名为I- xgb (3.83) > I- glm (4.28) > E- elnet (4.32) > I- rf (4.67) > E- glm (4.88) > I- svr (4.90) > I- elnet (4.94) > E- rf (6.03) > E- cubist(7.15),其中I表示单个模型,E表示集成模型。有趣的是,虽然单个GLM和XGB模型在校准期间表现出优越的性能,但在验证期间表现出较差的性能,这可能表明数据过拟合的问题。因此,建议采用集合ELNET方法进行珍珠粟产量的准确预测,其次是单独的RF模型。这些表现强调了根据特定地理和环境条件量身定制模型选择的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Advancing pearl millet yield forecasting: Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble machine learning approaches over Rajasthan, India.

Advancing pearl millet yield forecasting: Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble machine learning approaches over Rajasthan, India.

Advancing pearl millet yield forecasting: Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble machine learning approaches over Rajasthan, India.

Advancing pearl millet yield forecasting: Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble machine learning approaches over Rajasthan, India.

Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) is a resilient crop known for its ability to thrive in arid and semi-arid regions, making it a crucial staple in regions prone to drought. Rajasthan, a state in India, emerged as the top producer of pearl millet. This study enhances yield forecasting for pearl millet using machine learning models across nine districts viz. Jaipur, Ajmer, Jodhpur, Bikaner, Bharatpur, Alwar, Sikar, Jhunjhunu and Nagaur in Rajasthan, India. Data from 1997-2019 (23 years), including yield data from the Directorate of Economics and Statistics and weather data from the NASA POWER web portal, were analysed. The study employed individual machine learning methods (GLM, ELNET, XGB, SVR and RF) and their ensemble combinations (GLM, ELNET, Cubist and RF). Discerning the overall best performing model across all locations remained challenging. For instance, while ensemble models exhibited subpar performance in Barmer and Nagaur, their performance ranged from satisfactory to commendable in other locations. To identify the best model, all models were ranked based on their R2 and nRMSE (%) values. Combined average ranks during training and testing revealed the model performance ranking as I-XGB (3.83) >  I-GLM (4.28) >  E-ELNET (4.32) >  I-RF (4.67) >  E-GLM (4.88) >  I-SVR (4.90) >  I-ELNET (4.94) >  E-RF (6.03) >  E-Cubist (7.15), where I denotes individual model, while E denotes ensemble model. Intriguingly, while individual GLM and XGB models demonstrated superior performance during calibration, they exhibited poorer performance during validation, potentially indicating issues of data overfitting. Hence, the ensemble ELNET approach is recommended for accurate prediction of pearl millet yield, followed by the individual RF model. These performances underscore the importance of tailored model selection based on specific geographic and environmental conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信