Letícia Gabrielle Souza, Keisyanne De Araujo-Moura, Augusto César Ferreira De Moraes
{"title":"评估儿童家庭食物环境问卷的心理测量特性：系统回顾。","authors":"Letícia Gabrielle Souza, Keisyanne De Araujo-Moura, Augusto César Ferreira De Moraes","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Given the diverse aspects of the family food environment, it is essential to clarify the availability of tools, the assessed dimensions, and the extent to which they offer a comprehensive and valid evaluation of the domestic food setting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to assess the validity and reliability of instruments gauging the food environment within the pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in the EMBASE, Medline (PubMed), SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PsychINFO databases until December 2023, resulting in the identification of 2850 potentially eligible articles.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>After a thorough screening process, comprising language and title criteria, abstract scrutiny, and full-text reading, 179 full papers were separately reviewed, and 52 were chosen for analysis.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Predominantly conducted in the United States utilizing adapted tools, the investigations focused on the sociocultural environment as the most addressed domain. It covered 80.7% of instruments for children and 54.9% for adolescents. The prevailing reliability assessment method was internal consistency, using Cronbach's alpha-coefficient. Acceptable values ranged from 0.70 to 0.96 for children and 0.77 to 0.94 for adolescents. Out of the 52 studies selected, only 22 presented validity measures, with a primary focus on convergent and construct validity assessed through Pearson or Spearman correlation. The findings indicate that, while questionnaires assessing the family food environment exhibited acceptable reliability, validity measures were deemed limited and somewhat ambiguous.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the pivotal role of validity in evaluating methodological accuracy and relevance, particularly when measuring specific aspects, there is an imperative need to develop instruments that integrate robust validity measures for the comprehensive assessment of the family food environment.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022333228.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of Questionnaires to Assess the Family Food Environment in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Letícia Gabrielle Souza, Keisyanne De Araujo-Moura, Augusto César Ferreira De Moraes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Given the diverse aspects of the family food environment, it is essential to clarify the availability of tools, the assessed dimensions, and the extent to which they offer a comprehensive and valid evaluation of the domestic food setting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to assess the validity and reliability of instruments gauging the food environment within the pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in the EMBASE, Medline (PubMed), SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PsychINFO databases until December 2023, resulting in the identification of 2850 potentially eligible articles.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>After a thorough screening process, comprising language and title criteria, abstract scrutiny, and full-text reading, 179 full papers were separately reviewed, and 52 were chosen for analysis.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Predominantly conducted in the United States utilizing adapted tools, the investigations focused on the sociocultural environment as the most addressed domain. It covered 80.7% of instruments for children and 54.9% for adolescents. The prevailing reliability assessment method was internal consistency, using Cronbach's alpha-coefficient. Acceptable values ranged from 0.70 to 0.96 for children and 0.77 to 0.94 for adolescents. Out of the 52 studies selected, only 22 presented validity measures, with a primary focus on convergent and construct validity assessed through Pearson or Spearman correlation. The findings indicate that, while questionnaires assessing the family food environment exhibited acceptable reliability, validity measures were deemed limited and somewhat ambiguous.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the pivotal role of validity in evaluating methodological accuracy and relevance, particularly when measuring specific aspects, there is an imperative need to develop instruments that integrate robust validity measures for the comprehensive assessment of the family food environment.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022333228.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景：考虑到家庭食物环境的不同方面，有必要澄清工具的可用性、评估的维度以及它们在多大程度上提供了对家庭食物环境的全面和有效的评估。目的：本系统综述旨在评估儿童食品环境测量仪器的效度和可靠性。数据来源：截至2023年12月，在EMBASE、Medline （PubMed）、SCOPUS、Web of Science和PsychINFO数据库中进行了系统的文献检索，最终确定了2850篇可能符合条件的文章。数据提取：经过全面的筛选过程，包括语言和标题标准，摘要审查和全文阅读，分别审查了179篇全文，并选择了52篇进行分析。数据分析：主要是在美国进行的，使用了适应的工具，调查集中在社会文化环境作为最关注的领域。它覆盖了80.7%的儿童乐器和54.9%的青少年乐器。常用的信度评估方法是内部一致性，采用Cronbach's α -系数。儿童的可接受值为0.70至0.96，青少年的可接受值为0.77至0.94。在选定的52项研究中，只有22项提出了效度测量，主要关注通过Pearson或Spearman相关评估的收敛效度和构建效度。研究结果表明，虽然评估家庭食品环境的问卷显示出可接受的信度，但效度测量被认为是有限的，而且有些模糊。结论：考虑到效度在评估方法准确性和相关性方面的关键作用，特别是在测量特定方面时，迫切需要开发工具，将强大的效度测量整合到家庭食品环境的综合评估中。系统评审注册：普洛斯彼罗注册号。CRD42022333228。
Psychometric Properties of Questionnaires to Assess the Family Food Environment in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.
Context: Given the diverse aspects of the family food environment, it is essential to clarify the availability of tools, the assessed dimensions, and the extent to which they offer a comprehensive and valid evaluation of the domestic food setting.
Objective: This systematic review aims to assess the validity and reliability of instruments gauging the food environment within the pediatric population.
Data sources: A systematic literature search was conducted in the EMBASE, Medline (PubMed), SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PsychINFO databases until December 2023, resulting in the identification of 2850 potentially eligible articles.
Data extraction: After a thorough screening process, comprising language and title criteria, abstract scrutiny, and full-text reading, 179 full papers were separately reviewed, and 52 were chosen for analysis.
Data analysis: Predominantly conducted in the United States utilizing adapted tools, the investigations focused on the sociocultural environment as the most addressed domain. It covered 80.7% of instruments for children and 54.9% for adolescents. The prevailing reliability assessment method was internal consistency, using Cronbach's alpha-coefficient. Acceptable values ranged from 0.70 to 0.96 for children and 0.77 to 0.94 for adolescents. Out of the 52 studies selected, only 22 presented validity measures, with a primary focus on convergent and construct validity assessed through Pearson or Spearman correlation. The findings indicate that, while questionnaires assessing the family food environment exhibited acceptable reliability, validity measures were deemed limited and somewhat ambiguous.
Conclusion: Given the pivotal role of validity in evaluating methodological accuracy and relevance, particularly when measuring specific aspects, there is an imperative need to develop instruments that integrate robust validity measures for the comprehensive assessment of the family food environment.
期刊介绍：
Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
