大数据贝叶斯真理:万古霉素谷浓度目标不够精确,无法确定安全性或有效性。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf041
Justin Shiau, Sharmeen Roy, Paul Sabourenkov, Marc H Scheetz
{"title":"大数据贝叶斯真理:万古霉素谷浓度目标不够精确,无法确定安全性或有效性。","authors":"Justin Shiau, Sharmeen Roy, Paul Sabourenkov, Marc H Scheetz","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring is standard of care for vancomycin because of the known efficacy and safety exposure window (ie, area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] of 400-600 mg × 24 hours/L). Despite guideline recommendations, AUCs are infrequently calculated because of the perceived adequacy of trough (Cmin) concentrations. Yet, the percentage of real-world patients with goal measured vancomycin trough concentrations that achieve target vancomycin AUC remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large cohort of internationally represented adult patients treated with vancomycin in 2021 and 2022 and therapeutic drug monitoring performed had data anonymized via an electronic clearinghouse at DoseMe. Unique patients, dosing events, and measured Cmin were identified. Patient-individualized AUC was calculated using a Bayesian method with 4 validated models. For each dosing event, Cmin and AUC pairs were compared and categorized as \"low,\" \"target,\" and \"high\" using the therapeutic ranges for Cmin of 15-20 mg/L and AUC of 400-600 mg × 24 hours/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2022, 17,711 adult patients from the European Union (4.9%), Australia (4.0%), and the United States (91.1%) had 26 769 measured trough levels obtained. Categorical disagreement between Cmin and AUC was 34.3%, with most disagreement (7959 Cmin levels, 30%) occurring with low Cmin but target AUC. Only 23% of paired Cmin and AUC were within range. AUC was variable for all trough categories (ie, low, target, and high).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support AUC therapeutic drug monitoring and challenge Cmin as an adequate vancomycin AUC proxy. Because no trough concentration or range was sufficiently precise to ensure AUC targets, we suggest direct calculation of AUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 3","pages":"ofaf041"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Big Data Bayesian Truths: No Vancomycin Trough Concentration Target Is Sufficiently Precise for Safety or Efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Shiau, Sharmeen Roy, Paul Sabourenkov, Marc H Scheetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofaf041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring is standard of care for vancomycin because of the known efficacy and safety exposure window (ie, area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] of 400-600 mg × 24 hours/L). Despite guideline recommendations, AUCs are infrequently calculated because of the perceived adequacy of trough (Cmin) concentrations. Yet, the percentage of real-world patients with goal measured vancomycin trough concentrations that achieve target vancomycin AUC remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large cohort of internationally represented adult patients treated with vancomycin in 2021 and 2022 and therapeutic drug monitoring performed had data anonymized via an electronic clearinghouse at DoseMe. Unique patients, dosing events, and measured Cmin were identified. Patient-individualized AUC was calculated using a Bayesian method with 4 validated models. For each dosing event, Cmin and AUC pairs were compared and categorized as \\\"low,\\\" \\\"target,\\\" and \\\"high\\\" using the therapeutic ranges for Cmin of 15-20 mg/L and AUC of 400-600 mg × 24 hours/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2022, 17,711 adult patients from the European Union (4.9%), Australia (4.0%), and the United States (91.1%) had 26 769 measured trough levels obtained. Categorical disagreement between Cmin and AUC was 34.3%, with most disagreement (7959 Cmin levels, 30%) occurring with low Cmin but target AUC. Only 23% of paired Cmin and AUC were within range. AUC was variable for all trough categories (ie, low, target, and high).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support AUC therapeutic drug monitoring and challenge Cmin as an adequate vancomycin AUC proxy. Because no trough concentration or range was sufficiently precise to ensure AUC targets, we suggest direct calculation of AUC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"ofaf041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893978/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf041\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于已知万古霉素的疗效和安全性暴露窗口(即400-600 mg × 24小时/L的浓度-时间曲线下面积[AUC]),治疗性药物监测是万古霉素的标准护理。尽管有指南建议,但由于认为谷(Cmin)浓度足够,因此很少计算auc。然而,现实世界中万古霉素谷浓度达到万古霉素目标AUC的患者百分比仍然未知。方法:在2021年和2022年接受万古霉素治疗并进行治疗药物监测的大型国际代表性成年患者队列,通过DoseMe的电子信息交换所匿名化数据。确定了独特的患者、给药事件和测量的Cmin。采用贝叶斯方法计算患者个体化AUC,共有4个验证模型。对于每个给药事件,Cmin和AUC对被比较并分类为“低”、“目标”和“高”,Cmin的治疗范围为15- 20mg /L, AUC为400- 600mg × 24小时/L。结果:2022年,来自欧盟(4.9%)、澳大利亚(4.0%)和美国(91.1%)的17,711名成年患者获得了26 769个测量低谷水平。Cmin和AUC的分类差异为34.3%,其中大部分差异(7959 Cmin水平,30%)发生在低Cmin但目标AUC的情况下。只有23%的配对Cmin和AUC在范围内。所有低谷类别(即低、目标和高)的AUC都是可变的。结论:这些发现支持AUC治疗药物监测,并挑战Cmin作为万古霉素AUC的适当代理。由于没有足够精确的谷浓度或谷范围来确保AUC目标,我们建议直接计算AUC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Big Data Bayesian Truths: No Vancomycin Trough Concentration Target Is Sufficiently Precise for Safety or Efficacy.

Introduction: Therapeutic drug monitoring is standard of care for vancomycin because of the known efficacy and safety exposure window (ie, area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] of 400-600 mg × 24 hours/L). Despite guideline recommendations, AUCs are infrequently calculated because of the perceived adequacy of trough (Cmin) concentrations. Yet, the percentage of real-world patients with goal measured vancomycin trough concentrations that achieve target vancomycin AUC remains unknown.

Methods: A large cohort of internationally represented adult patients treated with vancomycin in 2021 and 2022 and therapeutic drug monitoring performed had data anonymized via an electronic clearinghouse at DoseMe. Unique patients, dosing events, and measured Cmin were identified. Patient-individualized AUC was calculated using a Bayesian method with 4 validated models. For each dosing event, Cmin and AUC pairs were compared and categorized as "low," "target," and "high" using the therapeutic ranges for Cmin of 15-20 mg/L and AUC of 400-600 mg × 24 hours/L.

Results: In 2022, 17,711 adult patients from the European Union (4.9%), Australia (4.0%), and the United States (91.1%) had 26 769 measured trough levels obtained. Categorical disagreement between Cmin and AUC was 34.3%, with most disagreement (7959 Cmin levels, 30%) occurring with low Cmin but target AUC. Only 23% of paired Cmin and AUC were within range. AUC was variable for all trough categories (ie, low, target, and high).

Conclusions: These findings support AUC therapeutic drug monitoring and challenge Cmin as an adequate vancomycin AUC proxy. Because no trough concentration or range was sufficiently precise to ensure AUC targets, we suggest direct calculation of AUC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信