IF 4.5 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Open Biology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1098/rsob.240226
Daniel Stránský, Monika Šteigerová, Markéta Kuklová, Veronika Hanzíková, Nikolina Canová, Jiří Novotný, Ladislav Šenolt, Ondřej Slanař
{"title":"Simple, streamlined, cost-effective cDNA synthesis method from cell cultures.","authors":"Daniel Stránský, Monika Šteigerová, Markéta Kuklová, Veronika Hanzíková, Nikolina Canová, Jiří Novotný, Ladislav Šenolt, Ondřej Slanař","doi":"10.1098/rsob.240226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Applications like drug development need simple and streamlined methods to process samples from 96-well cell culture plates for gene expression measurements. Unfortunately, current options are expensive for such processing. Therefore, our aim was to develop a method that would allow streamlined analysis of mRNA from 96-well cell culture plates while being relatively cheap and simple. We developed a method based on the qPCR 'Cells-to-cDNA' approach and validated it against commercially available kits using the same approach or spin columns-based RNA purification. For this purpose, we conducted a series of comparisons of gene expression from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, SK-HEP-1 and U-87 cell cultures in 96-well plates. Our final method involved lysing cells with 25-100 µl solution of 0.5% SDS, 10 mM DTT, 1 mg ml<sup>-1</sup> proteinase K dissolved in water, 1 h incubation at 50°C, followed by proteinase K inactivation at 90°C for 5 min and lysate neutralization with 1 : 1 dilution by 20% Tween 20 solution. Reverse transcription and qPCR were carried out using standard methods. This method showed a mean reduction of Ct ± s.d. value by 2.4 ± 1.3 compared with the 'Cells-to-cDNA' kit and by 1.4 ± 0.5 compared with the RNA purification kit with lower variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19629,"journal":{"name":"Open Biology","volume":"15 3","pages":"240226"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11896693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.240226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物开发等应用需要简单、简化的方法来处理来自 96 孔细胞培养板的样本,以进行基因表达测量。遗憾的是,目前的处理方法成本高昂。因此,我们的目标是开发一种既能简化 96 孔细胞培养板 mRNA 分析,又相对便宜和简单的方法。我们开发了一种基于 qPCR "细胞到 DNA "方法的方法,并将其与使用相同方法或基于旋转柱的 RNA 纯化的市售试剂盒进行了验证。为此,我们对 96 孔板中外周血单核细胞、SK-HEP-1 和 U-87 细胞培养物的基因表达进行了一系列比较。我们的最终方法是用 25-100 µl 溶于水的 0.5% SDS、10 mM DTT 和 1 mg ml-1 蛋白酶 K 溶液裂解细胞,在 50°C 孵育 1 小时,然后在 90°C 灭活蛋白酶 K 5 分钟,用 1 :1 稀释液中和。反转录和 qPCR 采用标准方法进行。与 "Cells-to-cDNA "试剂盒相比,该方法的平均 Ct ± s.d. 值降低了 2.4 ± 1.3,与 RNA 纯化试剂盒相比,平均 Ct ± s.d. 值降低了 1.4 ± 0.5,但变异性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simple, streamlined, cost-effective cDNA synthesis method from cell cultures.

Applications like drug development need simple and streamlined methods to process samples from 96-well cell culture plates for gene expression measurements. Unfortunately, current options are expensive for such processing. Therefore, our aim was to develop a method that would allow streamlined analysis of mRNA from 96-well cell culture plates while being relatively cheap and simple. We developed a method based on the qPCR 'Cells-to-cDNA' approach and validated it against commercially available kits using the same approach or spin columns-based RNA purification. For this purpose, we conducted a series of comparisons of gene expression from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, SK-HEP-1 and U-87 cell cultures in 96-well plates. Our final method involved lysing cells with 25-100 µl solution of 0.5% SDS, 10 mM DTT, 1 mg ml-1 proteinase K dissolved in water, 1 h incubation at 50°C, followed by proteinase K inactivation at 90°C for 5 min and lysate neutralization with 1 : 1 dilution by 20% Tween 20 solution. Reverse transcription and qPCR were carried out using standard methods. This method showed a mean reduction of Ct ± s.d. value by 2.4 ± 1.3 compared with the 'Cells-to-cDNA' kit and by 1.4 ± 0.5 compared with the RNA purification kit with lower variability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Biology
Open Biology BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
1.70%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Biology is an online journal that welcomes original, high impact research in cell and developmental biology, molecular and structural biology, biochemistry, neuroscience, immunology, microbiology and genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信