Sung-Shuo Kao, Deng-Chyan Wu, Seng-Kee Chuah, John Y Kao, Wei-Chen Tai, Chang-Bih Shie, I-Ting Wu, Wen-Chih Chen, Feng-Woei Tsay, Yan-Hua Chen, Ping-I Hsu
{"title":"比较持续性质子泵抑制剂治疗与按需质子泵抑制剂治疗在控制巴雷特食管患者症状方面的效果。","authors":"Sung-Shuo Kao, Deng-Chyan Wu, Seng-Kee Chuah, John Y Kao, Wei-Chen Tai, Chang-Bih Shie, I-Ting Wu, Wen-Chih Chen, Feng-Woei Tsay, Yan-Hua Chen, Ping-I Hsu","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether continuous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is superior to on-demand therapy for symptom control of Barrett's esophagus patients is unclear. The study aimed to compare the efficacies of the symptom control and the frequency of co-existent erosive esophagitis in patients with Barrett's esophagus by either continuous or on-demand PPI therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned (1:1) consecutive adult patients with symptomatic Barrett's esophagus to receive on-demand or continuous esomeprazole (40 mg q.d.) therapy for 40 weeks following an initial treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg daily for 8 weeks. A follow-up endoscopy was conducted at week 48. The primary outcome was total number of symptomatic days. The secondary outcome was the frequency of co-existent erosive esophagitis at week 48.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 2010 to December 2022, we randomly assigned 235 eligible patients to receive either on-demand (n = 119) or continuous (n = 116) esomeprazole therapy. The on-demand and continuous groups did not signicantly differ in symptom scores at each follow-up time point. Two treatment groups had a comparable total number of symptom days (27.7 ± 41.5 vs 24.3 ± 47.7; P = 0.570) but the on-demand group took fewer esomeprazole tablets than the continuous group (230.6 ± 96.5 vs 330.0 ± 15.6; P < 0.001). At week 48, the on-demand and continuous groups had comparable frequencies of erosive esophagitis (10.6% vs 6.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On-demand PPI therapy reduces the total amount of PPI used while achieving similar symptom relief compared to continuous PPI therapy in patients with Barrett's esophagus.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of continuous versus on-demand proton pump inhibitor therapy in symptom control of patients with Barrett's esophagus.\",\"authors\":\"Sung-Shuo Kao, Deng-Chyan Wu, Seng-Kee Chuah, John Y Kao, Wei-Chen Tai, Chang-Bih Shie, I-Ting Wu, Wen-Chih Chen, Feng-Woei Tsay, Yan-Hua Chen, Ping-I Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether continuous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is superior to on-demand therapy for symptom control of Barrett's esophagus patients is unclear. The study aimed to compare the efficacies of the symptom control and the frequency of co-existent erosive esophagitis in patients with Barrett's esophagus by either continuous or on-demand PPI therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned (1:1) consecutive adult patients with symptomatic Barrett's esophagus to receive on-demand or continuous esomeprazole (40 mg q.d.) therapy for 40 weeks following an initial treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg daily for 8 weeks. A follow-up endoscopy was conducted at week 48. The primary outcome was total number of symptomatic days. The secondary outcome was the frequency of co-existent erosive esophagitis at week 48.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 2010 to December 2022, we randomly assigned 235 eligible patients to receive either on-demand (n = 119) or continuous (n = 116) esomeprazole therapy. The on-demand and continuous groups did not signicantly differ in symptom scores at each follow-up time point. Two treatment groups had a comparable total number of symptom days (27.7 ± 41.5 vs 24.3 ± 47.7; P = 0.570) but the on-demand group took fewer esomeprazole tablets than the continuous group (230.6 ± 96.5 vs 330.0 ± 15.6; P < 0.001). At week 48, the on-demand and continuous groups had comparable frequencies of erosive esophagitis (10.6% vs 6.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On-demand PPI therapy reduces the total amount of PPI used while achieving similar symptom relief compared to continuous PPI therapy in patients with Barrett's esophagus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.03.006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.03.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:对于巴雷特食管患者的症状控制,持续质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗是否优于按需治疗尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较持续或按需PPI治疗Barrett食管患者的症状控制效果和糜烂性食管炎发生率。方法:我们随机分配(1:1)有症状的Barrett食管的连续成年患者,在最初使用埃索美拉唑40mg / d治疗8周后,按需或连续接受埃索美拉唑(40mg / d)治疗40周。第48周进行随访内窥镜检查。主要观察指标为总症状天数。次要终点是48周时并发糜烂性食管炎的频率。结果:从2010年2月到2022年12月,我们随机分配了235名符合条件的患者接受按需(n = 119)或连续(n = 116)埃索美拉唑治疗。按需治疗组和连续治疗组在每个随访时间点的症状评分无显著差异。两个治疗组的总症状天数相当(27.7±41.5 vs 24.3±47.7;P = 0.570),但按需治疗组服用埃索美拉唑片少于连续治疗组(230.6±96.5 vs 330.0±15.6;结论:与连续PPI治疗相比,按需PPI治疗减少了PPI的总使用量,同时获得了相似的症状缓解。
Comparison of continuous versus on-demand proton pump inhibitor therapy in symptom control of patients with Barrett's esophagus.
Background: Whether continuous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is superior to on-demand therapy for symptom control of Barrett's esophagus patients is unclear. The study aimed to compare the efficacies of the symptom control and the frequency of co-existent erosive esophagitis in patients with Barrett's esophagus by either continuous or on-demand PPI therapy.
Methods: We randomly assigned (1:1) consecutive adult patients with symptomatic Barrett's esophagus to receive on-demand or continuous esomeprazole (40 mg q.d.) therapy for 40 weeks following an initial treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg daily for 8 weeks. A follow-up endoscopy was conducted at week 48. The primary outcome was total number of symptomatic days. The secondary outcome was the frequency of co-existent erosive esophagitis at week 48.
Results: From February 2010 to December 2022, we randomly assigned 235 eligible patients to receive either on-demand (n = 119) or continuous (n = 116) esomeprazole therapy. The on-demand and continuous groups did not signicantly differ in symptom scores at each follow-up time point. Two treatment groups had a comparable total number of symptom days (27.7 ± 41.5 vs 24.3 ± 47.7; P = 0.570) but the on-demand group took fewer esomeprazole tablets than the continuous group (230.6 ± 96.5 vs 330.0 ± 15.6; P < 0.001). At week 48, the on-demand and continuous groups had comparable frequencies of erosive esophagitis (10.6% vs 6.7%).
Conclusion: On-demand PPI therapy reduces the total amount of PPI used while achieving similar symptom relief compared to continuous PPI therapy in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect.
As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.